Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyer: It’s Not Her Job To Corroborate Her Story

floridafan said:
You have not heard a single bit of testimony yet your mind is made up. Had the roles been reversed and it was a democratic candidate for the SC, you would be right out in front, DEMANDING, a polygraph, DEMANDING testimony under oath, DEMANDING that the candidate resign.
Click to expand...
the only thing either of us know is what we've read...that's why she needs to testify....
Because what's out there is not believable....unless you've seen something I have not...
 
TOP said:
the only thing either of us know is what we've read...that's why she needs to testify....
Because what's out there is not believable....unless you've seen something I have not...
Click to expand...

All three people involved need to testify. This should also be looked into by the FBI, but the White House wont allow it. I wonder why.
 
floridafan said:
Not only her, but all 3 people that we know about who were there.
Click to expand...
What three people? She remembers them but not anything else? Not when, not where, not why and not what...No other details....and maybe mistaking him for someone else?
 
floridafan said:
Its worth a whole lot in the court of public opinion. So what do you say, if Kavanaugh has nothing to hide he should be happy to take a polygraph. Right?
Click to expand...

Mob rule is not how we do things in America snowflake; we're still not the banana republic you brain dead dumbfucks on the left want to turn us into.
 
floridafan said:
You have not heard a single bit of testimony yet your mind is made up. Had the roles been reversed and it was a democratic candidate for the SC, you would be right out in front, DEMANDING, a polygraph, DEMANDING testimony under oath, DEMANDING that the candidate resign.
Click to expand...

Ironic in that the same can be said for you yet your simple mind was made up when you heard about the anonymous letter.
 
TOP said:
What three people? She remembers them but not anything else? Not when, not where, not why and not what...No other details....and maybe mistaking him for someone else?
Click to expand...

Kavanuagh and his friend should testify along with the accuser.
 
floridafan said:
If he is innocent he should want to take a polygraph also, to prove his innocence.
Click to expand...

We aren't a banana republic; we don't have to prove out innocence. It is presumed. Those who charge us must prove their claims with something more than "because I say so."

I am not surprised you have no clue about how this country works, how we are a nation of laws with Constitutional rights. Moron.
 
volsrock said:
Debra Katz, the attorney for the woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, said that it is not her client’s job to corroborate her claims.

Katz said on CNN on Monday that investigators should be responsible for proving Christine Blasey Ford’s claim that Kavanaugh held her down and drunkenly groped her while at a party in high school.

During the interview, Katz revealed that there was another girl present at the party, which allegedly took place in 1982 while Kavanaugh was attending Georgetown Prep. Ford previously told the Washington Post that there were four boys at the party but never indicated if there were other girls beside herself.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/17/kavanaugh-accuser-laywer-corroborate/

At first 4 boys were there, now it's a girl there

The waffling begins. Her concocted story is already falling apart.
Click to expand...

the caller is right wing fucking trash
 
It really isn't her job. That's what lawyers are for, to tell the story for them, and keep them from getting played, or unknowingly sabotaging themselves. It's basic understanding, that you get to grill for answers during a full blown trial.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top