FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Yeah good job, all you have to do is win every presidential election in the future forever to accomplish this. Good luck.
HUGE!! Trump to end birthright citizenship!!!
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
Yeah good job, all you have to do is win every presidential election in the future forever to accomplish this. Good luck.
Kudzu- "the constitution says 1 plus 1 =2"
Grugore- "The intent of the constitution, despite that it says "1 plus 1 =2," means 1 plus 1 =fish"
I'll await the fishy evidence of their intent.
It will likely include some Birthery type De Vattel bullshit that was thrown out in about googol plex lawsuits.
I prefer Blackstone, myself, and the clear and unequivocal language of the law.
Quick make a phonecall to your co-counsel Orly Taitz! The dentist lawyer who was sanctioned for her frivolous lawsuit against Obama.
Grugore- "The intent of the constitution, despite that it says "1 plus 1 =2," means 1 plus 1 =fish"
I'll await the fishy evidence of their intent.
It will likely include some Birthery type De Vattel bullshit that was thrown out in about googol plex lawsuits.
I prefer Blackstone, myself, and the clear and unequivocal language of the law.
Quick make a phonecall to your co-counsel Orly Taitz! The dentist lawyer who was sanctioned for her frivolous lawsuit against Obama.
Yes, but carefully worded to exclude the Native Americans, whose political jurisdiction were in their own nations, though they were born here they were not included as citizens and they didn't want them to be. Native Americans were not counted among the citizens of the United States until 1924... when Congress granted them citizenship. Until that time this Amendment did not count them among the number of people under the Jurisdiction of the United States. Even if they were outside their reservations...
Illegal woman comes to US and works as a maid cleaning Trump hotels for 10 years, gets raped
by a Trumptard disciple and gives birth in US. Child grows up and becomes a medical doctor for 25 years.
Trump signs an executive order banning birthright citizenship and ICE rounds her up during a brain surgery
and deports him/her.
These Trumpkins think that mom's status as undocumented should determine whether
this person gets to be a citizen in the only country he/she has ever known?
Take the locus of your attention off what the undocumented immigrant did and focus on the
child born here and your opinion on this should change, Republitard, unless you have no moral at all.
by a Trumptard disciple and gives birth in US. Child grows up and becomes a medical doctor for 25 years.
Trump signs an executive order banning birthright citizenship and ICE rounds her up during a brain surgery
and deports him/her.
These Trumpkins think that mom's status as undocumented should determine whether
this person gets to be a citizen in the only country he/she has ever known?
Take the locus of your attention off what the undocumented immigrant did and focus on the
child born here and your opinion on this should change, Republitard, unless you have no moral at all.
Trump has no standing.
It is assumed that others would challenge, this would eventually get a ruling. Your post doesn't change my opinion.
Not according to the Supreme Court. Your interpretation is the minority view. See federal law I posted above explaining who is included in those not subject to U. S. jurisdiction--it only applies to foreign diplomatic personnel.
Even if we don't consider the 14th Congress has constitutional authority to make naturalization policy and it designate citizenship for those born here except diplomats.
"White hating racist"? You are the only one who brought up race--I never mentioned it. You and a few others make everything racial.
Tell us, who is going to have standing?
Whose intent? The person making the speech?
Congress would have standing, considering they were given the power to decide citizenship. Also anybody whose citizenship was denied by the Executive Order, cities who have decided to be sanctuary cities and do not wish to change given the status of newborns... etc. People affected by the law would have standing.
Britian's constitution is not written out.
So the 14th Amendment of the Constitution violates federal law by encouraging illegals? I wonder which one has priority?
Which makes it useless in curbing the powers of government considering the legislative branch of Parliament is the "supreme and final source of law" all it takes to change the uncodified constitution is a simple vote of Parliament.
Show us where the Constitution says citizenship for those born here must have parents who are here legally. If it is "clear" it must be written clearly in the amendment.
The SC would not be ruling on the amendment. They would be ruling on the president's power to change the Constitution by executive order.
They already ruled on this issue in U. S. vs. Wong Kim Ark
Here's the deal.
The citizenship clause is already in the Constitution. Congress can't change that. No standing.
The only possible people affected by the law are those born here that are denied citizenship. Do you really think that is going to happen?
The Amendment is silent on that.
Don't always agree with you, but good clarity on this issue.
It really depends on how he words it and what they decide. I still believe that this is a ploy to get a ruling on the Amendment itself. You'll notice that this did not grant citizenship to the Native Americans... Which, again, were granted citizenship by act of Congress in 1924... The ruling on jurisdiction is necessary. Personally I think it would go against Trump.