HUGE!! Trump to end birthright citizenship!!!

[jbander]

Cranky Frank your denial over your message board obsession is only outdone by the typical leftist hypocrisy of your ridiculous outrage.

The clown car comes rolling in populated with the hate of all things.

 

[jbander]

Great I'll give some illegals that info and send them your way ....

I'll take a whole neighborhood of them over just one of your hate group as a neighbor. They are good people , your just a hater. and the rest of your hate group is also controlled totally by hatred of all the things your told to hate.

 

[RB 60]

If your only answer is cartoons , your out of here , you simply will disappear from my life. Your a waste of time.

It's not a cartoon, it's a puppet. So sorry I've confused you, you seem so easily confused.
You've never been part of my life and never will. Understandably so.

 

[jbander]

Like I said I have no time for cartoons so your out of here. Way to much wasted bandwidth from your hate group. This is simple you have to contribute and that doesn't mean to tell me only that you don't like and think I'm dumb, that's just wasting everyone's time. So your out of here it's been a slice

 

[Into the Night]

Democrats will not adjust rhetoric until you traitorous scumsucking redneck losers change your racist evil ways.

What racism? YOU are the only one bringing up racism here. YOU are the racist ones here.

 

[Into the Night]

WE all know that what you are trying to sell here is just total nonsense , the court has no voice in abortion. Ya you bet. That's just straight out loon gumbo.

They don't have any legal voice on abortion.

 

[Into the Night]

The 1st Amendment was made applicable to the states in Gitlow v. NY in 1925.

No court has the authority to change the Constitution.

The 9th Amendment was made applicable to the states in Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965.

It already did.

The 9th Amendment refers to "other rights" not listed in 1-8. One of those is privacy.

That is enumerating a right. It has nothing to do with the 9th amendment. See the 4th amendment, which does apply to the States also.

Freedom of assembly (1st), quartering of troops (3rd), search and seizure (4th), and self-incrimination (5th) all illustrate the Bill of Rights meant to protect our privacy.

The 1st amendment does not address privacy at all. Neither does the 3rd or 5th amendments.

You would know all this if you had ever read Roe v. Wade which you should do before giving opinions on constitutional matters.

The court does not have authority to change the constitution.

You have said the court can rule laws unconstitutional. It ruled laws against abortion unconstitutional because states cannot violate the Constitution.

They weren't. Most of the Constitution of the United States does not apply to the States.

You are still unfamiliar with the incorporation process by which most rights in the Bill of Rights were made applicable to the states.

No court has authority to change the Constitution.

Not understanding this process causes you confusion on all these issues.

What 'process'? No court has authority to change the Constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

You said only the states could amend the Constitution but for all 27 Amendments they were proposed by a 2/3 vote of each house of Congress and ratified by 3/4 of the states. That process did not involve the states alone but the states and Congress.

Congress can propose, but that is not amending the Constitution. Only the States can amend the Constitution of the United States.

A constitutional convention is another method (never used) to propose amendments, but it is not done by the states alone because Congress has to call the constitutional convention at the request of 2/3 of the states.

It is done by the States alone, whether Congress agrees with it or not.

None of these methods allows the states alone to amend the Constitution. It always requires the states + Congress.

Nope. Only the States can amend the Constitution of the United States.

All this is contained in the Constitution which can be easily read which you obviously have not done since the last time we had this same conversation.

Go read it again.

 

[Into the Night]

No, the states are bound by the Constitution and cannot change it by themselves or interpret it.

They themselves can amend the Constitution. They are the only ones that can.

 

[Into the Night]

Do you have a source for your cut and paste?

Demanding Holy Links is itself a fallacy, known as the Prosecutor's fallacy. It is a combination of two other fallacies, the false authority fallacy, and the argument of the stone fallacy.

These are actual events. I commend J Craft for taking the time to research and list them. Anyone who wants to can look this stuff up for yourselves. Get off your butt and go do your own footwork.

 

[Into the Night]

Interpreting the meaning of a law is completely different from determining if Congress has the authority to pass that law. To determine Congress's authority the court must interpret the Constitution itself.

Nope. It only needs to interpret the new law. No court has authority to interpret the Constitution of the United States nor of any State.

 

[Into the Night]

Either are you but your defining it for us , so again who should we believe some red neck Dodo bird that has no clue or A law school. Get a life , you lose and you won't find anyone who says your right. Unless you can convince another hate party member but hell their brain dead.

Neither. The Constitution speaks for itself quite nicely.

 

[Into the Night]

Every red neck right winger has their own interpretation of the constitution, it's funnier then a hoot. Some are quite funny and some are quite interesting but everyone seems to define the constitution to make it ok to sell their hate or attack someone else. They are always ridiculous and a total waste of time.

Bigotry.

 

[kudzu]

Demanding Holy Links is itself a fallacy, known as the Prosecutor's fallacy. It is a combination of two other fallacies, the false authority fallacy, and the argument of the stone fallacy.

These are actual events. I commend J Craft for taking the time to research and list them. Anyone who wants to can look this stuff up for yourselves. Get off your butt and go do your own footwork.

Its just a cut and paste from 2013. Unsigned crap .....

https://tisaboutfreedom.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/a-list-of-obamas-constitutional-violations/

 

[Into the Night]

PRINCETON, NJ -- Non-Hispanic whites accounted for 89% of Republican self-identifiers nationwide in 2012, while accounting for 70% of independents and 60% of Democrats. Over one-fifth of Democrats (22%) were black, while 16% of independents were Hispanic.

Racial and Ethnic Composition of U.S., by Party ID, 2012

These results are based on more than 338,000 interviews conducted as part of Gallup Daily tracking in 2012, and clearly underscore the distinct racial profiles of partisan groups in today's political landscape.

Republicans are overwhelmingly non-Hispanic white, at a level that is significantly higher than the self-identified white percentage of the national adult population. Just 2% of Republicans are black, and 6% are Hispanic.


Your party is finally being itself. The WHITE party

Racism and bigotry.

 

[Nordberg]

The states do not amend the constitution, they ratify an amendment with3/4/rs of states agreeing. An amendment is proposed in the house and requires a 2/3rds vote in both the house and senate.

 

[Into the Night]

Just about Every one of you old fat white guys that make up a large majority of the hate party are bigots. Don't have to go very far from here to see it in just about everyone of their hate party posts. Lot of of stupid lot of hate and lot of bigotry.

Inversion fallacy. Bigotry. Racism.

 

[Into the Night]

Maybe because the reds are a party of haters and bigots led by a racist. That might be why.

Inversion fallacy. Bigotry.

 

[Into the Night]

Almost poetic but still real stupid.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

You are an uneducated knuckle dragger

Racism. Bigotry.