Yes, of course you're evil. That doesn't mean I support people attacking you. I feel about it the way you'd likely feel about someone being attacked for wearing a swastika. The violence is wrong, but that doesn't make the swastika-wearer any less evil.
HIgh Schools now banning MAGA hats!!!!
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
Yes, of course you're evil. That doesn't mean I support people attacking you. I feel about it the way you'd likely feel about someone being attacked for wearing a swastika. The violence is wrong, but that doesn't make the swastika-wearer any less evil.
I didn't claim Trump had destroyed the Constitution and balance of powers, so I can't be capitulating when I say he hasn't. Try to keep up, little one.
It's like trying to argue with four-year-olds.
Oh well.... not everyone can get into Princeton's economic program.
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
It looks a little gay when he is following you around and thanking you for everyone of your posts.
Makes me believe you are running two memberships here and feathering your own ass!
Some of you people here in this forum are some of the goofiest motherfuckers I have ever known about!
You posted that he is a dictator and I proved that he is not. Keeping up appears to be your problem.
Since the E-Con program at Vanderbilt is rated 8th and Princeton is 17th, why would I consider Princeton over Vanderbilt?
Last edited:
. ..too bad its just a costly wasted degree for some of those who "do"....
Pretty framed diploma, though...right?Here's the link showing the universities' E-Con program ratings.
https://www.niche.com/colleges/search/best-colleges-for-economics/
Princeton is barely in the top twenty (20).
https://www.niche.com/colleges/search/best-colleges-for-economics/
Princeton is barely in the top twenty (20).
You believe Oneuli's claim?
I don't.
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
I hate to tell you this OPie, but most public places are now frisking people wearing MAGA hats for weapons everywhere they go now!
Debating the respective merits of institutions that there's no proof either of you attended is fruitless, and irrelevant.
Self-identifying as "an Asian-American" in order to bolster your argument?
Perhaps another Pocahontas?
As you know, you're misrepresenting your subjective opinion as fact again. You know it, and I know it. Try to focus and reread the thread.
Who knows? The fact is that making unverifiable claims about oneself in an attempt to gain an advantage in debate is fallacious.
What smears of Conservatives are inaccurate?