An idea for bipartisan tax reform

[canceled.2021.1]

When it comes to what we're talking about, bend over and spread your cheeks.




Gotta love this; "I'm opposed to anything that ruins the false narrative bullshit argument I'm constructing."

Go fuck yourself.

Seem like you are the one getting emotional now

Once you resorted to the “fuck you”, you conceded

Look I apologize. I set you up. I knew you couldn’t find those words. It wasn’t fair. I’m sorry.

I accept your concession.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

That's not what you said at first.

That's you changing what you said, post-hoc, and demanding I accommodate that change.

Fuck you, I'm not accommodating shit.

You are the one demanding that I accommodate your false premise. I am nobody’s N word Tyrone. I dance for no one.

 

[Flash]

When Republicans say "tax reform," they're usually talking about ideas for shifting more of the tax burden away from the donor class, and to the working class.

The Republican tax cuts have shifted the tax burden to the wealthy and decreased the taxes paid by the working class. The top earners are the only group that pays a larger share of their income in taxes than their share of the income.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

What I don't accept is your bullshit interpretation of them.

You are trying to substitute your opinion for the standard, and you do that because your argument is weak and you need to establish a reasoning basis for it.

The only way your argument makes any sense is if people accommodate your entitled interpretation.

Well, I'm denying you that entitlement.

So suck it.

I am not interpreting anything. The words are spelled out clearly

I am not asking you to accommodate anything. I am fully accepting that you are wrong. I am OK with you being wrong.

I have already accepted your concession.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

You're the one brainwashed here, trying to establish your weirdo, functionally illiterate interpretation of the Constitution as the standard.

It's not.

It's not even close.




Wasn't Mexico supposed to pay for that wall?

You have gotten very desperate. I have already accepted your concession

 

[canceled.2021.1]

The Constitution is open to interpretation which is why we have the Judicial Branch, you fucking moron.

I know that is what is done. As I said the court usurped a power it wasn’t given in the Constitution

Of course you are free to quote me the clause in the Constitution that specifically states that the Supreme Court has the authority to rule what is constitutional and what isn’t.

Not only does that text not exist in the Constitution, it fails the logic test

 

[canceled.2021.1]

You actually do need the court to validate it because that's how the Constitution delineates powers.

We know you don't really like the Constitution; that's why you support Confederate monuments...they had a Constitution that was more to your interpretation.

You ad homs prove you are losing

I accept your concession

 

[canceled.2021.1]

I don't agree and neither did every other lower court.

I am not asking you to agree.

Do you really think it matters to me whether you agree or not?

By virtue of you being a leftist I knew you would disagree

The US Constitution as written is antithetical to leftism which is why your side is always trying to “interpret” it and twist it to your liking.

But you will never find text to support your views.

For instance the US Constitution as written does not confer a right to vote. But you think it does

 

[canceled.2021.1]

No, what's not an argument is you pretending your opinion is the standard, when it's not.




Your interpretation of the 10th Amendment and the Constitution is not the standard.

Again faulty premise. I never said my opinion IS the standard. I am saying it is my opinion nothing more and nothing less

The original text of the US Constitution backs me up.

 

[Irish]

Lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie.

In terms of specialized treatment, national wait times were shortest for medical oncology (3.7 weeks).
https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/health-care-wait-times-hit-20-weeks-in-2016-report-1.3171718

Medical oncology = cancer specialists.

Kill yourself.

LOL! You are dumb private pile.

 

[Irish]

Ask Canadians if they would change their system for ours...and the vast majority would laugh in your face! The rest would as what "system" means.

Then why do so many come to the US for treatment?

 

[Irish]

No they don't. That's a lie. You're disseminating propaganda now because you have not thought this through for yourself.




When you base your entire belief system on lies, you end up posting shit like this^

Shut up FAG!

 

[Ross Dolan]

Then why do so many come to the US for treatment?

Ask almost any Canadian if he/she would want to change his/her healthcare system in Canada for the "healthcare system" of the United States...

...and he/she would laugh in your face.

So would almost every citizen of every other industrialized nation on the planet.

Digest that...and you will understand why your question is bullshit.

 

[Wolverine]

Because we live in a society. And in a society, you pay taxes so that society can function.

No I pay pay taxes so that infrastructure can function, not a welfare state where leeches like you do not work, and receive the same benefits.

 

[Wolverine]

Ask almost any Canadian if he/she would want to change his/her healthcare system in Canada for the "healthcare system" of the United States...

...and he/she would laugh in your face.

So would almost every citizen of every other industrialized nation on the planet.

Digest that...and you will understand why your question is bullshit.

You didn't answer the question!

 

[Ross Dolan]

You didn't answer the question!

I do not answer bullshit questions.

 

[Oneuli]

The Republican tax cuts have shifted the tax burden to the wealthy and decreased the taxes paid by the working class.

The Republican tax cuts have shifted the tax burden FROM the wealthy and INCREASED the share of taxes paid by the non-wealthy.
Here:

https://taxfoundation.org/summary-latest-federal-income-tax-data-2018-update/

https://itep.org/who-pays-taxes-in-america-in-2018/

As you can see, the top 1% went from paying 37.32% of all income taxes to paying 22.9%. As you'll also see, while the tax changes dropped total effective tax rates by between 4.6 and 5.7% for the bottom 95% of workers, it dropped them between 7.4% and 8.4% for those in the top 5%.

In that second link you'll see that the share of taxes paid by the bottom 60% were effectively unchanged, but the upper-middle class took on a larger share of the tax burden so that the upper class could take on a smaller share (those in the 60th through 95th percentile had their share rise, while those in the top 5% had theirs fall).

Since, as you can now see, your assumptions were wildly incorrect, I hope you'll be so kind as to share with us who gave you the false information. I'm always curious where these lies come from, originally. Thanks.

 

[LV426]

This is faulty logic. Court rulings are not indicative of unclear language

That is precisely what they are indicative of and why the Constitution grants the Judicial Branch the power to determine the Constitutionality of laws.

 

[LV426]

You don’t think the Constitution was clear in delineating powers of the federal government? It is unclear to you as to whose role certain tasks are?

The Constitution grants Congress the power to levy taxes and tariffs to provide for both the common defense and general welfare.

The Constitution grants the Judicial branch the power to determine whether those laws passed by Congress conform to a Constitutional Standard.

That's what the Constitution says.

 

[LV426]

No where in the US Constitution will you find the words giving the Supreme Court ultimate responsibility over what is and isn’t constitutional

Wrong. That is precisely the function of the Judicial Branch.

You're not an American, are you? Be honest. I can tell when you're lying.