Another Traitor Monument Comes Down

MASON said:
The South thought the CSA was a separate country.The North proved them wrong.
Click to expand...

Interesting how you avoided the first question. Tells me you don't really believe anything was racist. You're only saying what some idiot told you.

During Reconstruction, the Confederate States had to do thing to be READMITTED to the U.S. You can't be RE-admitted unless you left. There we have the answer to the question you were too scared to answer. By the Confederacy being a separate country, no treason could have been committed by those States. They were separate and leaving something isn't treason.
 
CFM said:
Interesting how you avoided the first question. Tells me you don't really believe anything was racist. You're only saying what some idiot told you.

During Reconstruction, the Confederate States had to do thing to be READMITTED to the U.S. You can't be RE-admitted unless you left. There we have the answer to the question you were too scared to answer. By the Confederacy being a separate country, no treason could have been committed by those States. They were separate and leaving something isn't treason.
Click to expand...

Nice spin,the very attempt to steal states of the USA was treason
 
MASON said:
Nice spin,the very attempt to steal states of the USA was treason
Click to expand...

No one was attempting to steal States. They left by their own choice. Leaving isn't treason. Having to be readmitted means you were a separate country and could not commit treason against a country for which you had no allegiance.
 
CFM said:
No one was attempting to steal States. They left by their own choice. Leaving isn't treason. Having to be readmitted means you were a separate country and could not commit treason against a country for which you had no allegiance.
Click to expand...

Sorry but your CSA needed to win the war to prove your point.
 
MASON said:
Sorry but your CSA needed to win the war to prove your point.
Click to expand...

Not at all. The point is made by definitions and terms that prove they were separate and could, therefore, not be treasonous.

Maybe you're too stupid to be able to understand those terms and definitions. We'll go with that added to your cowardice.
 
MASON said:
Why are so many Conservative 's pro CSA?
Click to expand...

Because Modern Conservatism shares the same values as the Confederacy.

That's why they want the monuments; they glorify and sanitize those with whom they share the same beliefs and values.
 
iolo said:
I doubt that the majority of German troops in WW2 fought for extermination camps, but that was the result of their fighting. Mugs always fight for their masters, and the Southern masters were racist scumbags who should all have been shot - they could have been hung up on a scaffold down there and looked more lifelike too!
Click to expand...

:smh:
 
Dark Soul said:
Which one of these are you calling "evil"?
Click to expand...

"They fought for the side of evil" = they were on the side that wanted to preserve slavery as an economic and social way of life. However, they "were sold the bill of goods that they were fighting for "state's rights" and "freedom for our way of life."

In other words, they were lied to by the Confederate powers that be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top