MOTHER of all CARAVANS - Poor & Uneducated WHITES ... mass to invade U.S.A.

...that's not enough....and even if it was, how are you going to do that? Fund that....

Funding isn't a big issue. We blow about $300 billion per year more on our military than we need to in order to defend our interests. We can also raise well over $1 trillion in extra revenues just by raising taxes closer to developed-nation norms.

New York's etc. homeless pop under control? Why not focus on who's here and in need....?

That's part of what I'm doing. Lowering the cost of lost-skill labor by importing more workers will make it easier to serve those who are here and in need.
 
Why do you want "swinging the door open much wider"?

I already explained that. I would recommend rereading.


Why do we need them "desperately"?

I already explained that. I would recommend rereading.

Face it, it's for Dem votes and nothing more.

No. Obviously if they were focused on votes, they'd want lower immigration, since low-immigration eras are better for Democrats, for the reasons I explained.

Our country is a great place, but why must liberals want to allow so many illegals?

As you'll recall, I'm calling for allowing more LEGAL immigration.

Do they hate our traditions and
customs

Do you mean like our tradition of high immigration? I don't think liberals hate that tradition. Why do you?
 
Funding isn't a big issue. We blow about $300 billion per year more on our military than we need to in order to defend our interests. We can also raise well over $1 trillion in extra revenues just by raising taxes closer to developed-nation norms.



That's part of what I'm doing. Lowering the cost of lost-skill labor by importing more workers will make it easier to serve those who are here and in need.
No need to import...plenty of people in need here now...
If we have so much funding, then our neighbors should be the ones receiving those funds....
It's clear you're only 20 something...but do tell...what are you "doing"?
You need to get "closer"‘ to actual people if you want to make a real difference....
Refocus;) You don't know what to do or what needs to be done....
 
Run, hide, another pretend caravan that will never make it to the border. Rump must need a distraction about now.
 
I'm tired of being told Social Security won't be here for me because of this stupid demographic crisis the xenophobes are insisting on perpetuating.

So you think allowing a bunch of unskilled asylum seekers in our country will help?
 
I already explained that. I would recommend rereading.

I already explained that. I would recommend rereading.

No. Obviously if they were focused on votes, they'd want lower immigration, since low-immigration eras are better for Democrats, for the reasons I explained.

As you'll recall, I'm calling for allowing more LEGAL immigration.

Do you mean like our tradition of high immigration? I don't think liberals hate that tradition. Why do you?

You whine about funding our military, why do you think it's OK to allow a bunch of unskilled asylum seekers toting a bunch of kids that probably don't even speak English that will just add to our welfare rolls?
Like I said, screw 'em and put them at the back of the line of those who want to come here legally. And the illegals already here, send them ALL back. Yes, it's all about votes and you know it.
 
No need to import...plenty of people in need here now...

Too few, sadly, which has driven the cost of many low-level services to the point where they're outside the range that the middle class will pay, and also a real burden on government in cases where it is subsidizing those services for special classes of citizens (e.g., lower-level home healthcare for vets and the elderly). Fortunately, we can fix that by boosting the pool of those lower-level workers.

what are you "doing"?

Completely schooling you in an argument. I would have thought that was obvious.

You need to get "closer"‘ to actual people

I think you inadvertently give the game away there. For too many on the right, the only humans that count as "actual people" are the subset that they perceive as being members of their tribe.... generally, white, rural, native-born Christian heterosexuals. Those are the "actual people" for them. That's the "real America." Those of us who come from outside that tight little circle don't even count.
 
So you are saying that if a state flips from red to blue the citizens of that state automatically become smarter, better educated, productive, and richer!!!!!

Very obviously, I said nothing of the sort. Why not find your courage and address what I've actually said, rather than cowering from real debate by trying to assign to me positions I have never taken? Try not to be so pathetic.
 
Then you should have no problem requiring immigrants to meet the same requirements as Mexico does!

How does that follow? The way you structured this makes it sound like you think something I said leads naturally to that conclusion, but it seems like a complete non sequitur to me. If you want to ask whether I support those requirements, simply ask. Don't pretend it flows from something I said.
 
You whine about funding our military

You should stop and ask yourself why you perceive it as "whining" when someone points out the facts of our military funding levels. The simple fact is, the US spends far more on our military than all our potential adversaries combined. In fact, I'm not sure any nation in all of history has ever spent as much as we do, in terms of spending relative to its major adversaries. We are the first nation in history to be in an arm's race with ourselves.

why do you think it's OK to allow a bunch of unskilled asylum seekers toting a bunch of kids that probably don't even speak English that will just add to our welfare rolls?

I explained why we need more younger people. Ideally, those would be lower-skilled young people, so they're not effectively cutting in line in front of existing citizens. What you want is pressure from below to accelerate the career-progression escalator, not pressure from above or the middle to stall it. As for welfare, as I said, I'm open to ideas to limit access to welfare for these new arrivals.

Like I said, screw 'em and put them at the back of the line of those who want to come here legally. And the illegals already here, send them ALL back. Yes, it's all about votes and you know it.

No. As you now know (assuming you weren't so lazy as to neglect to confirm that what I said was correct), historically lower immigration rates correlate with better performance for liberal politicians (a correlation, by the way, that holds true abroad, too -- high-immigration periods always end up playgrounds for right-wing politicians who cater to xenophobic bigots). So, if it were all about votes, liberals would be in favor of greatly restricting immigration. But sometimes it's about what's best for the country and for the people... a political concept that is utterly alien to conservatives, for whom the ONLY thing that matters is acquiring more political power.
 
Last edited:
How does that follow? The way you structured this makes it sound like you think something I said leads naturally to that conclusion, but it seems like a complete non sequitur to me. If you want to ask whether I support those requirements, simply ask. Don't pretend it flows from something I said.

Oh but it does dear you said to welcome these people with open arms. Then you want us to basically pay them to learn how to be productive members of the US. So I simply said if you want to open the borders then you should have no problem using the same standards as Mexico uses. Any thing less then you are advocating welfare to any and all who come here. But nice try at deflection.
 
Very obviously, I said nothing of the sort. Why not find your courage and address what I've actually said, rather than cowering from real debate by trying to assign to me positions I have never taken? Try not to be so pathetic.

Oh but you implied it by saying red state citizens are lazy shiftless dregs of humanity (I paraphrase) So it only stands to reason if a red state becomes a blue state then the reverse must apply. BTW nice try at hiding your racism as red states have a larger population of blacks and other minorities than blue states.
 
You should stop and ask yourself why you perceive it as "whining" when someone points out the facts of our military funding levels. The simple fact is, the US spends far more on our military than all our potential adversaries combined.

You should stop and ask yourself why you perceive it as "whining" when someone points out the facts of our military funding levels. The simple fact is, the US spends far more on our military than all our potential adversaries combined.


And you overlook the fact that we have more military commitments supporting world peace around the world than any of our potential adversaries!!!!!!


I explained why we need more younger people. Ideally, those would be lower-skilled young people, so they're not effectively cutting in line in front of existing citizens.


Ah the idealistic view of a youngster just starting to climb the career ladder, but hasn't learned the wisdom that comes with age and experience.

A question how do you create career progression stagnation?

Ans. By flooding the job market in companies with less experienced workers all competing for the same promotions. As a result fewer get promoted so there is less demand for lower skilled workers and jobless goes up. But hell you are in your twenties and I am in my 70's with over 50 years of job experience so naturally you must know more than I do.

7hCbP4e.gif
 
Too few, sadly, which has driven the cost of many low-level services to the point where they're outside the range that the middle class will pay, and also a real burden on government in cases where it is subsidizing those services for special classes of citizens (e.g., lower-level home healthcare for vets and the elderly). Fortunately, we can fix that by boosting the pool of those lower-level workers.



Completely schooling you in an argument. I would have thought that was obvious.



I think you inadvertently give the game away there. For too many on the right, the only humans that count as "actual people" are the subset that they perceive as being members of their tribe.... generally, white, rural, native-born Christian heterosexuals. Those are the "actual people" for them. That's the "real America." Those of us who come from outside that tight little circle don't even count.
"Those of us"...oh my dear..you're in bigger trouble than I imagined....best get out into the real world...real soon, you hear?:)
 
Trump also said he would stop foreign aid to those countries. That will make those who are sick of crime and starvation to seek greener pastures. It makes them want to leave right away. Trump needs a boogieman and he has to keep them coming to maintain the fear levels. Trump is probably finacing caravans.
 
Trump also said he would stop foreign aid to those countries. That will make those who are sick of crime and starvation to seek greener pastures. It makes them want to leave right away. Trump needs a boogieman and he has to keep them coming to maintain the fear levels. Trump is probably finacing caravans.
There you go;) Well, I hope he stops "financing them"very soon...‘Problem solved...Emergency ended....Crisis averted. Whew....
*
 
Trump also said he would stop foreign aid to those countries. That will make those who are sick of crime and starvation to seek greener pastures. It makes them want to leave right away. Trump needs a boogieman and he has to keep them coming to maintain the fear levels. Trump is probably finacing caravans.
 
Back
Top