The most religious candidate is a liberal, change!

Nordberg said:
Somebody made up insulting names for all his opponents. Can you think of who that was? Talk about identity politics? Pete is getting traction even though he is very young. His interviews show he is thoughtful, intelligent and knows the issues. Trump shows mental deterioration. A hateful man with mental problems should not have that kind of power.
Click to expand...

but he also had policies, that were popular.

what does bootyjudge want to do?
 
Nordberg said:
Abortions are not done on children. They are done on zygotes. Those collections of cells have no rights. Are you suggesting a pregnant woman has no rights?
Click to expand...

Then you are a science denier. A zygote is a stage of development for a human being. Period. Or do you think there is a magic baby fairy that comes at some point to turn the 'collection of cells' into a human? FYI... we are all collections of cells.

How did you jump to the moronic last sentence above?
 
Jarod said:
I have to amend, it is difficult, but is is not a child, it is a potential child. I think the Mothers right to privacy from government intervention in her life is greater than the potential child. I agree abortion should be banned in the third trimester unless the health of the mother is at significant risk. In the first two trimesters its not the governments province. In the third if the mothers health is at significant its not the governments province.
Click to expand...

No moron. It is not a 'potential child'. People who announce they are pregnant do not announce that they THINK they MIGHT have a human child. They are pregnant with child. Period.

If you want to argue at what point an unborn child is deserving of basic human rights protections, that is a legal argument and valid. But the stupidity to pretend it isn't a human child is flat earth level idiocy.
 
Superfreak said:
No moron. It is not a 'potential child'. People who announce they are pregnant do not announce that they THINK they MIGHT have a human child. They are pregnant with child. Period.

If you want to argue at what point an unborn child is deserving of basic human rights protections, that is a legal argument and valid. But the stupidity to pretend it isn't a human child is flat earth level idiocy.
Click to expand...

You can call it what you want, it is not a child. Scientifically speaking its not. Linguistically speaking it is not. Look up the words "embryo" and "fetus". Silly.

It is a human embryo until its 8th week, it is a fetus until it is born. Once born it is a child.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
You can call it what you want, it is not a child. Scientifically speaking its not. Linguistically speaking it is not. Look up the words "embryo" and "fetus". Silly.

It is a human embryo until its 8th week, it is a fetus until it is born. Once born it is a child.
Click to expand...

Embryo and fetus are stages of human development. everyone calls it a child. They don't say 'I am pregnant with an embryo/fetus'. It is a human life. period.
 
Superfreak said:
Embryo and fetus are stages of human development. everyone calls it a child. They don't say 'I am pregnant with an embryo/fetus'. It is a human life. period.
Click to expand...

That does not change what it is. I knew a lady who called it her tadpole, does that make it so?
 
StoneByStone said:
Are you just being an edgelord?
Click to expand...

Edgelord? I don't even know what that is. I'm just trying to be practical here. The GOAL ... is to replace Trump with ... just about anybody, but that means you have to have a viable candidate.
Mayor Pete seems like a nice guy, is Progressive, and may have had a chance as a 'closeted homosexual'. But seeing him:
1. Kissing another man in a loving way, and
2. Calling the other man 'his Husband'.

... DOESN'T seem like a 'Vote getter'.
 
Jack said:
Edgelord? I don't even know what that is. I'm just trying to be practical here. The GOAL ... is to replace Trump with ... just about anybody, but that means you have to have a viable candidate.
Mayor Pete seems like a nice guy, is Progressive, and may have had a chance as a 'closeted homosexual'. But seeing him:
1. Kissing another man in a loving way, and
2. Calling the other man 'his Husband'.

... DOESN'T seem like a 'Vote getter'.
Click to expand...

In the old world you would have been correct, now days it is not an issue.
 
kudzu said:
I like him, Jack.. He's smart, well-spoken, well-educated and healthy.
Click to expand...

I like him too, kudzu. I just don't think he's electable. We can all cast our 'feel good' votes, but then end up with Trump for another 4 years. There's lots of viable candidates to choose from. (just an opinion)
 
Jack said:
I like him too, kudzu. I just don't think he's electable. We can all cast our 'feel good' votes, but then end up with Trump for another 4 years. There's lots of viable candidates to choose from. (just an opinion)
Click to expand...

I'm listening. Who do you like?
 
Nordberg said:
Abortions are not done on children. They are done on zygotes. Those collections of cells have no rights. Are you suggesting a pregnant woman has no rights?
Click to expand...

if you are offering to permit abortions on zygotes and not thereafter, I am willing to accept that compromise........that gives you four days after conception to have a legal abortion......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top