Trump: Its fake news.... Mueller report.... Nope.

Superfreak said:
What republicans are you referring to moron?

What is it you expect them to say? That the collusion wasn't there? That the coordination wasn't there?

Or are you expecting them to run around mocking the ignorant comments by people like you?
Click to expand...

Usually they would be supporting the President. Saying things like, “no collusion.” “He appears to be cleared.” You know, like what Bob Barr did.
 
So when Bill Clinton said hello to his old friend Loretta Lynch it was a scandal.

When Rump dictates a memo to Sessions about limiting the Investigation into himself, it’s cool?
 
Jarod said:
So when Bill Clinton said hello to his old friend Loretta Lynch is was a scandal.

When Rump dictates a memo to Sessions about limiting the Investigation into himself, it’s cool?
Click to expand...

Lol... secretly meets on a tarmac while his wife is under investigation... Garud says 'says hello to his old friend'. Hack status verified.
 
Superfreak said:
Lol... secretly meets on a tarmac while his wife is under investigation... Garud says 'says hello to his old friend'. Hack status verified.
Click to expand...

OK, even using your version how was that worse than what Trump did.

Clinton was not her boss, and there is no evidence Clinton instructed her to limit her investigation.

Rump wrote a memo instructing his attorney general to limit the investigation into himself. Much worse than what Clinton did, Yet you were out raged by Bill Clinton.
 
Jarod said:
When the New York Times reported that Trump ordered Don McGahan to tell the AG to fire Mueller, Trump screamed... FAKE NEWS.

BAM

Page 216 of the Report.


Not FAKE NEWS. Whose fake news? DONALD J. TRUMP's administration.
Click to expand...

Full context; not obstruction.

Vol.1, page 78
That weekend, the President called McGahn and directed him to have the Special Counsel removed because of asserted
conflicts of interest. McGahn did not carry out the instructions for fear as being seen as triggering another Saturday Night Massacre
and instead prepared to resign. McGahn ultimately did not quit and the President did not follow up with McGahn on his request
to have the Special Counsel removed.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
OK, even using your version how was that worse than what Trump did.

Clinton was not her boss, and there is no evidence Clinton instructed her to limit her investigation.

Rump wrote a memo instructing his attorney general to limit the investigation into himself. Much worse than what Clinton did, Yet you were out raged by Bill Clinton.
Click to expand...

LMAO... you keep on spinning Garud.
 
Stretch said:
Full context; not obstruction.

Vol.1, page 78
That weekend, the President called McGahn and directed him to have the Special Counsel removed because of asserted
conflicts of interest. McGahn did not carry out the instructions for fear as being seen as triggering another Saturday Night Massacre
and instead prepared to resign. McGahn ultimately did not quit anf the President did not follow up with McGahn on his request
to have the Special Counsel removed.
Click to expand...

Poor Garud... completely demolished again.
 
Truth Detector said:
No; I am saying that Presidents can make such requests and then the advice of White House council explains why it should not be done. Are you saying Mueller was fired? Are you claiming that the investigation was hindered in any way?
Click to expand...

Bingo.

If Trump wanted Mullet fired bad enough—Mullet would have been fired. If merely discussing firing Mullet is a crime—then that’s a pretty broad interpretation of the law as it pertains to obstruction.

More importantly, as I’ve been explaining to these goof balls, it’s increasingly likely Barr is going to indict some people who instigated the very investigation Trump *discussed* obstructing.

I’ve been right about this thing for over two years and they still don’t listen to me lol.
 
Jarod said:
So when Bill Clinton said hello to his old friend Loretta Lynch it was a scandal.
Click to expand...

Said hello to his old friend? On an airport tarmac? He couldn't have called her? You take stupid and dishonest to epic levels with this kind of tripe snowflake. :laugh:

Jarod said:
When Rump dictates a memo to Sessions about limiting the Investigation into himself, it’s cool?
Click to expand...

Was it illegal to pen such a memo? Was Mueller fired? Was the investigation hindered? I'll understand your continued efforts to deflect, lie and avoid answer with a simple yes or no.

You really have to be the shittiest lawyer on the planet with arguments like these. :laugh:
 
Jarod said:
No, you don’t think Usually in a situation like this Republicans offer a word of support?
Click to expand...

Translation:

giphy.gif
 
Jarod said:
OK, even using your version how was that worse than what Trump did.

Clinton was not her boss, and there is no evidence Clinton instructed her to limit her investigation.

Rump wrote a memo instructing his attorney general to limit the investigation into himself. Much worse than what Clinton did, Yet you were out raged by Bill Clinton.
Click to expand...

Was the investigation hindered in any way? Yes or no Brad? This isn't hard unless you are a dishonest hack. Was Mueller fired? Yes or no Brad? This isn't hard unless you are a dishonest hack.

Yes Brad; there is NOTHING suspicious about an ex President meeting the AG on the tarmac of an airport in secret whose wife is under investigation....if you are mentally retarded or a partisan hack.
 
Stretch said:
Full context; not obstruction.

Vol.1, page 78
That weekend, the President called McGahn and directed him to have the Special Counsel removed because of asserted
conflicts of interest. McGahn did not carry out the instructions for fear as being seen as triggering another Saturday Night Massacre
and instead prepared to resign. McGahn ultimately did not quit and the President did not follow up with McGahn on his request
to have the Special Counsel removed.
Click to expand...

Well bloody hell lol.

It’s a legitimate argument to question Mullet’s conflict of interest. In fact, Mullet’s personal relationship with Comey is sufficient grounds for recusal.

And it was about that time when I started typing Mullet instead of Mueller because the conflict was so glaring only a weasel wouldn’t recuse on account of it.
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
Well bloody hell lol.

It’s a legitimate argument to question Mullet’s conflict of interest. In fact, Mullet’s personal relationship with Comey is sufficient grounds for recusal.

And it was about that time when I started typing Mullet instead of Mueller because the conflict was so glaring only a weasel wouldn’t recuse on account of it.
Click to expand...

HE did not "question Mueller's conflict of interest" he ordered Mueller fired. Thats the difference between a crime or not.
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
Bingo.

If Trump wanted Mullet fired bad enough—Mullet would have been fired. If merely discussing firing Mullet is a crime—then that’s a pretty broad interpretation of the law as it pertains to obstruction.

More importantly, as I’ve been explaining to these goof balls, it’s increasingly likely Barr is going to indict some people who instigated the very investigation Trump *discussed* obstructing.

I’ve been right about this thing for over two years and they still don’t listen to me lol.
Click to expand...

In addition, isn't leaking investigatory material to the press a Federal crime? I want them to find these rats who worked on the Mueller team and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

Their leaks were the reason Trump was pissed and wanted to put an end to it. And rightly so.

Also, I want to know why Mueller's investigation doesn't even talk about how the press obtained these leaks. He seems focused on attempting to find something wrong with Trumps reaction but NOTHING wrong within his own team. Seriously???
 
Truth Detector said:
Was the investigation hindered in any way? Yes or no Brad? This isn't hard unless you are a dishonest hack. Was Mueller fired? Yes or no Brad? This isn't hard unless you are a dishonest hack.

Yes Brad; there is NOTHING suspicious about an ex President meeting the AG on the tarmac of an airport in secret whose wife is under investigation....if you are mentally retarded or a partisan hack.
Click to expand...

Trump clearly endeavored to hinder the investigation, and that is a crime.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top