the "Barr" has been lowered.

This one ^ again, we all know where their thinking starts:youtube_share;lkz7xgsPGmQ]https://youtu.be/lkz7xgsPGmQ[/video]

LAME; but then, you are full of shit and embarrassed that you are a low IQ dupe and have fallen for the great HOAX. You gonna cry?
 
I watched A.G. Barr practically wear a cheerleader uniform and perform on President Trump's (aka Orange Oaf) regarding the (then) yet-to-be released Mueller report.

Here's just a hint as to Barr's bias.....during his press conference, he stated half a dozen times or more that there was "no collusion" between the Orange Oaf, his campaign staff and Russian business/government personnel. And yet, upon release of the report the Mueller report focuses on CONSPIRACY, and NOT collusion, since "collusion" is NOT against the law, per se.

I'm listening to the radio as commentators and personalities thumbing through the report.....and it seems that Mueller's report is NOT as black & white as Barr would
have us believe. Some examples:


https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...y-special-counsel-robert-muellers-report-now/

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...ck-barrs-skewed-view-on-airing-mueller-report

Folks, the fix was in on this one when the Orange Oaf put Barr in.....but it ain't over until the proverbial fat lady sings:

http://time.com/5557644/donald-trump-other-investigations-mueller/

Man, I can't believe you used CHEERLEADER. A couple of hours ago, I was wishing I knew how to DRAW. I'd put BARR'S head on a cheerleader with a big FAT T on his sweater with his pompons and a skirt!

PS Legally, there is NO such word as 'collusion'. Barr, the AG of the US, an ATTORNEY used it 6 times.
 
Here is a newsflash for you puddin. Now get ready because your mind is about to be BLOWN.

A Special Counsel is supposed to investigate CRIMES. Since as you state collusion is not a crime, why would Mueller investigate that? He investigated an actual CRIME of conspiracy.

There was none.

Now continue to keep crying for us. This is almost as enjoyable as November 2016

What's sad is when you take a condescending attitude, and then make a complete fool out of yourself.

Once more for the cheap seats: Mueller's report was about CONSPIRACY to commit a crime, NOT collusion...and there's a whole LOT of stuff that's fishy about team Trump's actions during the campaign (remember, a few of the boys connected are now convicted criminals whose actions during the campaign are worth further study). This is why although on one hand there is "insufficient evidence", that doesn't mean there isn't enough for further study. Case in point: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p-citing-possible-obstruction-acts/ar-BBW4pLz

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/m...s-potential-obstruction-of-justice-2019-04-18
 
No genius, I pointing out the FACT that the pages you excerpted don't exactly jibe with Barr's jabbering about collusion...nor do they disprove what was asked/stated in the links I provided. Got that?

Mueller wrote it.
Barr spoke it.
No collusion, conspiracy, coordination between Trump campaign and Russia.
 
I wonder if those who can't think beyond the talking points and propaganda or have a rational, fact based response to information that does not concur with their beliefs rely on silly cartoons? A pity.

yes you are very sad today

you can't say we didn't warn you that this was coming
 
It's entirely up to you archives, keep on hoping Dorothy lands her balloon in your backyard with good news
I couldn't care less, I laugh at you

Once again, an inability to rationally and logically defend his opposition to valid information results in posts like these by GITR. Sad.
 
What's sad is when you take a condescending attitude, and then make a complete fool out of yourself.

Once more for the cheap seats: Mueller's report was about CONSPIRACY to commit a crime, NOT collusion...and there's a whole LOT of stuff that's fishy about team Trump's actions during the campaign (remember, a few of the boys connected are now convicted criminals whose actions during the campaign are worth further study). This is why although on one hand there is "insufficient evidence", that doesn't mean there isn't enough for further study. Case in point: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p-citing-possible-obstruction-acts/ar-BBW4pLz

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/m...s-potential-obstruction-of-justice-2019-04-18

keep it up plz keep it up till 2020 plz
 
Man, I can't believe you used CHEERLEADER. A couple of hours ago, I was wishing I knew how to DRAW. I'd put BARR'S head on a cheerleader with a big FAT T on his sweater with his pompons and a skirt!

PS Legally, there is NO such word as 'collusion'. Barr, the AG of the US, an ATTORNEY used it 6 times.

Another duped leftist liar who is going to cry for the next 6 years.

giphy.gif
 
What's sad is when you take a condescending attitude, and then make a complete fool out of yourself.

Once more for the cheap seats: Mueller's report was about CONSPIRACY to commit a crime, NOT collusion...and there's a whole LOT of stuff that's fishy about team Trump's actions during the campaign (remember, a few of the boys connected are now convicted criminals whose actions during the campaign are worth further study). This is why although on one hand there is "insufficient evidence", that doesn't mean there isn't enough for further study. Case in point: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p-citing-possible-obstruction-acts/ar-BBW4pLz

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/m...s-potential-obstruction-of-justice-2019-04-18

You lie

But I understand your need to do this. You are very sad today. Is this how you felt the day after Trump beat Crooked Hillary? Do you need a scream pillow?

You can't say we didn't warn you
 
What's sad is when you take a condescending attitude, and then make a complete fool out of yourself.

I know! Why do you do it?

Once more for the cheap seats: Mueller's report was about CONSPIRACY to commit a crime, NOT collusion...and there's a whole LOT of stuff that's fishy about team Trump's actions during the campaign (remember, a few of the boys connected are now convicted criminals whose actions during the campaign are worth further study). This is why although on one hand there is "insufficient evidence", that doesn't mean there isn't enough for further study. Case in point: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p-citing-possible-obstruction-acts/ar-BBW4pLz

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/m...s-potential-obstruction-of-justice-2019-04-18

Once more; it has been the LIBERAL media and leftist dupes who have been chanting COLLUSION. It really doesn't matter what you call it. It was a massive HOAX perpetrated by corrupt JD players and the Democratic Party of the Jackass to disenfranchise 60 million voters.

The HOAX failed; now we will find out who the leakers were and the cabal who fostered this corrupt, divisive and wasteful HOAX and bring them to justice.
 
ya gotta keep pounding it into their pointy headed skulls and hope some of it gets thru

Ain't happening, any astute individual isn't buying it nor the right wing media's attempt now to sell it, as I've noted earlier, it is only the beginning innings, BenghaziGate took six years, and this is the Democrats' BenghaziGate
 
Back
Top