Mueller speaks at 11 am today

[anatta]

Future prosecutors and Congress should be paying attention.

damn straight. no more special prosecutors. Starr and Mueller were disasters

 

[Superfreak]

I cant see Mueller saying anything different than what the report says....


that is...


There was lots of coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russian Government. Trump has plausible deniability.

There were 10 incidences of Obstruction, and the action to take as a result of that is up to Congress because the Justice Department has a policy against indicting a sitting president.

Link us up to the portion of the report that says there was lots of coordination. Or admit you are once again a liar.

 

[Jack]

His statement was CLEAR, had Rump not been president he would have been indicted. Had anyone else committed those acts of criminal obstruction, they would have been charged.

Pretty clear to anyone that watched.

 

[Truth Detector]

Tell that to all the people in jail. Quit name calling and insulting. You are being childish. Grow up.
You cannot read or understand. He said the opposite.

No one in jail had anything to do with the Russians colluding with the Trump campaign you moron. It would be name calling if it were not true. But you really are a dishonest moron on steroids. That is descriptive of who you are.

You don't like it, stop posting like a dishonest moron on steroids. Twat.

Anyone else ever notice how leftist assholes never complain when liberals hurl their insults? STFU dumbass.

 

[anatta]

Best thing about this is it's MORE PRESSURE on Pelosi to impeach!! time to get going!

 

[Truth Detector]

It looks like you will get your wish. Congress has been forced into doing what they are suppose to do ... uphold the Law.

Another stupid prediction. The Democratic Party of the Jackass know that an impeachment process would be the death knell to their chances in 2020.

 

[Jarod]

I would have told you if I found he was not guilty.
I was not allowed to indict him.

 

[Superfreak]

He said...

IF WE HAD EVIDENCE THE PRESIDENT DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME, WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO.
Then he said...
WE COULD NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY INDICT THE PRESIDENT.
Then he said...
SO COMMENTING ON HIS GUILT WOULD BE AGAINST DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES.

Read between the lines, RUMP is guilty.

How do you prove a negative you fucking idiot?

 

[Truth Detector]

goes to show though that Mueller was a partisan hack who couldn't prove anything, and is reduced to innuendo

So true; it is despicable that he milked the American taxpayer for all he could as well. Then to attempt to justify it with this speech, it is the icing on the cake.

 

[domer76]

So Mueller isn't the above reproach guy you guys told us he was? He couldn't tell Barr no? That seems odd doesn't it GayRod?

I know you are disappointed with his report exonerating President Trump. But you had to always know that there was no collusion and since there was no underlying crime, it was going to be really hard to prove obstruction. You had to know that GayRod. Or did you believe the Democrat Media Industrial Complex that told you that any day now Trump was going to be taken down?

This is what he said:

“If we had confidence the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”

“Charging the President with a crime was not an option we could consider.”
Due to DOJ policy

Constitutionally. Nobody from DOJ could. That’s the job of Congress.

“There was insufficient evidence to charge the Trump campaign with conspiracy” He didn’t say there was no collusion.

So, Trump and his campaign were not exonerated from anything

Delusional moron.

 

[Jack]

Correct! I saw a dishonest SC trying to justify two years of nothing burger. He failed for anyone who has half a brain.

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha --->Truth Detector shitting in his pants<--- LOVE IT!!!

 

[Truth Detector]

Show me that quote. You cant.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

 

[Superfreak]

hahaha, you hate truth.

How many times have you already lied in this thread alone?

 

[Jarod]

This is what he said:

“If we had confidence the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”

“Charging the President with a crime was not an option we could consider.”
Due to DOJ policy

Constitutionally. Nobody from DOJ could. That’s the job of Congress.

“There was insufficient evidence to charge the Trump campaign with conspiracy” He didn’t say there was no collusion.

So, Trump and his campaign were not exonerated from anything

Delusional moron.

BAM BAM BAM!

 

[Jarod]

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Different than your claim.

 

[Truth Detector]

His statement was CLEAR, had Rump not been president he would have been indicted.

That isn't what he said you dishonest hack. The ONLY thing the SC can do is report that crimes had been committed to the AG. None were detailed. Most of the report was worthless speculative baloney of the kind one would expect from a gossip magazine.

Had anyone else committed those acts of criminal obstruction, they would have been charged.

What Obstruction? NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.

FLAIL much?

 

[Truth Detector]

If anyone other than the president had done that, he would have been indicted.

For what? NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.

 

[Superfreak]

There was insufficient evidence of evidence on conspiracy, not collusion. PLENTY OF COLLUSION.

Link us up Garud. where in the report does it say there was collusion?

 

[Truth Detector]

He approached the investigation in an impartial manner,

He conducted his investigation in a partisan dishonest manner.

 

[Jack]

Got to admit I was wrong, it was noteworthy, perhaps not to the level some are making it out to be, but from the Trumpkins reaction, nearly a complete reversal of a half hour ago, it didn't make them happy

I always like the first thirty minutes after these things happen to see them flounder, soon the demogogues on Fox and the radio will frame their position for them and then in unison it will be regurgitated here, but that intial response, when they are left on their own, is priceless

Kinda' makes the day when they all begin squealing at the same time.