R dies , his daughter outs his evil

Celticguy said:
Sounds like someone is very afraid that there are improbable vote counts. What happens if there were 2 million more votes in LA than citizens ?
Click to expand...

The Constitution:

"Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."

Where does it say citizens, idiot?
 
evince said:
Did you know that since 1982, the Republican Party had been legally prohibited from contesting elections due to suspected vote fraud, because of a legal agreement called the Consent Decree the GOP made with the Democrat Party?

Finally, 36 years later, a judge has ended the agreement, freeing the Republican Party to ensure electoral integrity by investigating and pursuing suspected vote fraud.
Betcha you never heard or seen this truly momentous news in the Left-infested mainstream nedia. Why’s that?
THE 1982 CONSENT DECREE
As I explained in my post of November 15, 2012, “Why the GOP won’t challenge vote fraud,” in 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the Republican National Committee (RNC), the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).
The lawsuit alleged that:
The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.
The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.
The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.
To settle the lawsuit, in 1982 — while Ronald Reagan was President (1981-1989) — the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance.



the cold hard facts these evil assholes keep pretending doesn't exist



the courts kept REFUSING to release the republican party from this consent decree for 36 years because they kept cheating voters and getting caught


then they got a pliant SCOTUS which freed them up to cheat some more
Click to expand...

Once again... desh proves she doesn't read her own links.

"And with that, Judge Vazquez, an Obama appointee, ended that noxious 1982 Consent Decree legal agreement between the RNC and DNC which had tied the Republican Party’s hands from contesting elections and investigating vote fraud for 36 years."
 
evince said:
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sco...census-citizenship-question/story?id=63386980




a republican dies


his daughter receives his papers


they are full of evil plans for the nation


including a load of information on the census questions the fucking racists have planned




She sends that information to the SCOTUS



in that info he makes perfectly clear it was ALL about race and propping up WHITE MALE POWER
Click to expand...
Opponents of the Trump administration's plan to ask about citizenship on the 2020 census have alerted the U.S. Supreme Court of what they call "smoking gun" evidence that government officials lied in sworn testimony about their rationale for adding the question.
The submission, a letter Thursday from ACLU attorney Dale Ho, who argued the case before the court last month, comes as the justices have been deliberating on the case and expected to hand down their decision within weeks.
"The new evidence reveals that Dr. Thomas Hofeller, a longtime redistricting specialist, played a significant role in orchestrating the addition of the citizenship question to the 2020 Decennial Census in order to create a structural electoral advantage for, in his own words, 'Republicans and non-Hispanic whites,'" Ho writes.
"Petitioners [the Commerce Department] obscured his role through affirmative misrepresentations," he said.

The evidence could call into question the administration's claims that the citizenship question was specifically requested by the Justice Department to aid enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. Government officials have denied allegations of bald politics or racial discrimination as true motives.
News of Hofeller's role was first reported by the New York Times.
Hofeller, well-known in Republican circles as a tactician, had extensively studied the value of citizenship data in gerrymandering. He died last year.



the people who run the republican party and hire evil shits like this guy to help them cheat disagree with you idiots
 
volsrock said:
Where’s the illegality in asking if you’re a citizen?
Click to expand...

Where does it say "citizen?

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."

Not illegal, but the purpose is clear.

Racist cunt
 
volsrock said:
But its all good to have illegal aliens vote, the more the merrier as long as they vote Democrat..what is wrong with asking about their legal status, gee what is the commie left afraid of, finding out the REAL numbers, more like 30 million
Click to expand...

The census is not about voting. This guy was the architect of the citizenship issue on the census.
 
Superfreak said:
Notice you still haven't answered the question?

You have not provided any 'facts' desh. You were simply rambling and now you are throwing a tantrum.

Answer the question... HOW is it racist?

Answer the question... WHY would anyone here legally care about answering a citizenship question?

Can you do that desh? Or are you going to run away from them?
Click to expand...

All of the reasoning is laid out in the notes from the GOP gerrymandering expert who died. His daughter shared all his communication, and in that communication he specifically says the citizenship question is to give Republicans and non-Hispanic whites an advantage.

He literally says that in his e-mails.

The Republican Party and all Conservatives are nothing more than a collection of racist cheats.
 
evince said:
Opponents of the Trump administration's plan to ask about citizenship on the 2020 census have alerted the U.S. Supreme Court of what they call "smoking gun" evidence that government officials lied in sworn testimony about their rationale for adding the question.
The submission, a letter Thursday from ACLU attorney Dale Ho, who argued the case before the court last month, comes as the justices have been deliberating on the case and expected to hand down their decision within weeks.
"The new evidence reveals that Dr. Thomas Hofeller, a longtime redistricting specialist, played a significant role in orchestrating the addition of the citizenship question to the 2020 Decennial Census in order to create a structural electoral advantage for, in his own words, 'Republicans and non-Hispanic whites,'" Ho writes.
"Petitioners [the Commerce Department] obscured his role through affirmative misrepresentations," he said.

The evidence could call into question the administration's claims that the citizenship question was specifically requested by the Justice Department to aid enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. Government officials have denied allegations of bald politics or racial discrimination as true motives.
News of Hofeller's role was first reported by the New York Times.
Hofeller, well-known in Republican circles as a tactician, had extensively studied the value of citizenship data in gerrymandering. He died last year.



the people who run the republican party and hire evil shits like this guy to help them cheat disagree with you idiots
Click to expand...

Again... how does this 'help them cheat'?

Who are you saying is going to be scared of answering a simple question?
 
Celticguy said:
Nah, nothing at all.
United States congressional apportionment is the process by which seats in the United States House of Representatives are distributed among the 50 states according to the most recent decennial census mandated by the United States Constitution.
Click to expand...

Right, so adding a citizenship question isn't going to do anything to address voting.

What a moron. Are your parents blood relatives?
 
volsrock said:
Obama dispatched Rahm Emanuel to take over the 2010 census resulting in deleting the citizenship question from the long form which 20% of Americans receive randomly.

Deletion of the citizenship question allowed the ‘Apportionment Population’ to grow with the inclusion of massive numbers of illegals.

For those curious about this, note that not every human that breathes the air inside the borders of the USA and its territories is entitled to representation in Congress.

Only the Apportionment Population is entitled to have representatives in Congress.

Census takers count a lot of things but counting citizens is the whole purpose for the Census to begin with.
Click to expand...

Find the part that excludes illegal aliens.

"Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."

Wrong on counting citizens. Counting Persons
 
evince said:
https://www.dcclothesline.com/2018/...an-finally-contest-vote-fraud-after-36-years/
Click to expand...



Originally Posted by evince
Did you know that since 1982, the Republican Party had been legally prohibited from contesting elections due to suspected vote fraud, because of a legal agreement called the Consent Decree the GOP made with the Democrat Party?

Finally, 36 years later, a judge has ended the agreement, freeing the Republican Party to ensure electoral integrity by investigating and pursuing suspected vote fraud.
Betcha you never heard or seen this truly momentous news in the Left-infested mainstream nedia. Why’s that?
THE 1982 CONSENT DECREE
As I explained in my post of November 15, 2012, “Why the GOP won’t challenge vote fraud,” in 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the Republican National Committee (RNC), the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).
The lawsuit alleged that:
The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.
The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.
The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.
To settle the lawsuit, in 1982 — while Ronald Reagan was President (1981-1989) — the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance.




your party is evil and hates democracy



the cold hard facts these evil assholes keep pretending doesn't exist



the courts kept REFUSING to release the republican party from this consent decree for 36 years because they kept cheating voters and getting caught


then they got a pliant SCOTUS which freed them up to cheat some more
 
Superfreak said:
Again... how does this 'help them cheat'?
Click to expand...

By apportioning a disproportionate share of representation to people who didn't earn it, and can't wield it responsibly.

The reason Conservatism never makes ground on college campuses is because Conservatism cannot stand to the scrutiny of rigorous, intellectual debate...and it never will.
 
This is all from the PERSONAL letters of a man the republican party HIRED for decades to help them retain white male power by thwarting democracy in any why they could
 
Celticguy said:
Nah, nothing at all.
United States congressional apportionment is the process by which seats in the United States House of Representatives are distributed among the 50 states according to the most recent decennial census mandated by the United States Constitution.
Click to expand...

"Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. "

Need someone to interpret that for you, illiterate fucktard?
 
evince said:
Originally Posted by evince
Did you know that since 1982, the Republican Party had been legally prohibited from contesting elections due to suspected vote fraud, because of a legal agreement called the Consent Decree the GOP made with the Democrat Party?

Finally, 36 years later, a judge has ended the agreement, freeing the Republican Party to ensure electoral integrity by investigating and pursuing suspected vote fraud.
Betcha you never heard or seen this truly momentous news in the Left-infested mainstream nedia. Why’s that?
THE 1982 CONSENT DECREE
As I explained in my post of November 15, 2012, “Why the GOP won’t challenge vote fraud,” in 1981, during the gubernatorial election in New Jersey (NJ), a lawsuit was brought against the Republican National Committee (RNC), the NJ Republican State Committee (RSC), and three individuals (John A. Kelly, Ronald Kaufman, and Alex Hurtado), accusing them of violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1971, 1973, and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

The lawsuit was brought by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the NJ Democratic State Committee (DSC), and two individuals (Virginia L. Peggins and Lynette Monroe).
The lawsuit alleged that:
The RNC and RSC targeted minority voters in New Jersey in an effort to intimidate them.
The RNC created a voter challenge list by mailing sample ballots to individuals in precincts with a high percentage of racial or ethnic minority registered voters. Then the RNC put the names of individuals whose postcards were returned as undeliverable on a list of voters to challenge at the polls.
The RNC enlisted the help of off-duty sheriffs and police officers with “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands, to intimidate voters by standing at polling places in minority precincts during voting. Some of the officers allegedly wore firearms in a visible manner.
To settle the lawsuit, in 1982 — while Ronald Reagan was President (1981-1989) — the RNC and RSC entered into an agreement or Consent Decree, which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance.




your party is evil and hates democracy



the cold hard facts these evil assholes keep pretending doesn't exist



the courts kept REFUSING to release the republican party from this consent decree for 36 years because they kept cheating voters and getting caught


then they got a pliant SCOTUS which freed them up to cheat some more
Click to expand...

Desh... no one is saying the above didn't happen. What I am saying is you are an idiot that doesn't read your own links.

"And with that, Judge Vazquez, an Obama appointee, ended that noxious 1982 Consent Decree legal agreement between the RNC and DNC which had tied the Republican Party’s hands from contesting elections and investigating vote fraud for 36 years."

SCOTUS did not end it. The time expired and an OBAMA appointed judge stated the DNC did not prove their case and thus he did not extend it.
 
Superfreak said:
Desh... no one is saying the above didn't happen. What I am saying is you are an idiot that doesn't read your own links.

"And with that, Judge Vazquez, an Obama appointee, ended that noxious 1982 Consent Decree legal agreement between the RNC and DNC which had tied the Republican Party’s hands from contesting elections and investigating vote fraud for 36 years."

SCOTUS did not end it. The time expired and an OBAMA appointed judge stated the DNC did not prove their case and thus he did not extend it.
Click to expand...

So...your position is that no one should contest election results? What are you trying to say?
 
evince said:
This is all from the PERSONAL letters of a man the republican party HIRED for decades to help them retain white male power by thwarting democracy in any why they could
Click to expand...

Yet you are so dishonest and such a partisan hack that you cannot answer basic questions on this topic?

HOW is this racist?

WHO is going to be scared of answering the question?

Are you going to continue to run away desh?
 
TTQ64 said:
He's trying to blame President Obama for something a racist white man did.

It's their standard MO.
Click to expand...

Not sure I understand how...

So...because an Obama-appointed judge threw out the consent decree between the GOP and Democrats that prohibited them from contesting election results, that caused Mark Harris to cheat in North Carolina?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top