prior non-investigation has no effect on whether the matter is worth investigating.
But nobody is asking the House to investigate -so why go on about this?
who SHOULD be investigating and WAS investigating was the Uk. prosecutor who was fired because of Biden's
malfeasance of protecting his son
Sure it does, who is screaming for the investigation now, the very same entities that had years to investigate the matter but did nothing while at the same time they were investigating everything looking to embarrass Obama. If it was legitimate the Issa, Nunes, Gowdy, Chaffetz, Jordan, Meadows, etc. would have jumped all over it especially when Biden was the sitting VP
And if you looked at the facts you'd see that that prosecutor was never investigating Biden and the actual investigation into the power company he was pursuing had ended before Biden's involvement