The coming race war in America and the importance of Biden / Harris in it

My wife, a tenured professor of neuroscience at the top neuroscience graduate program in the country
who is in the room right now says you are completely full of shit and have zero science to support your racist lies. Don't kill the messenger.
She is lead author on a biomarker seeking resiliency clinical longitudinal study of deployed and returning US marines.
She knows this subject cold. I hate the appeal to authority, but this is too on point to ignore. So forgive that fallacy. lol

Witold works hard to justify his superiority of genes and culture. It's nearly an obsession for him. Do not expect him to budge anymore than David Duke's ideas on Jews.
 
Witold works hard to justify his superiority of genes and culture. It's nearly an obsession for him. Do not expect him to budge anymore than David Duke's ideas on Jews.

No, I think it has deep meaning if certain groups are the way they are because of genetics.

You Western Europeans don't think much, you're prehistoric overly emotional, extreme Individualists.

You just kind of understand, what you understand, your Western Europeans are some of the worst racial trash among humanity, if you ask me.
 
No, I think it has deep meaning if certain groups are the way they are because of genetics.

You Western Europeans don't think much, you're prehistoric overly emotional, extreme Individualists.

You just kind of understand, what you understand, your Western Europeans are some of the worst racial trash among humanity, if you ask me.

Of course you do. That's my point, son.

I'm not Euro trash, but obviously you are unable to comprehend anything you don't like.

Wrong again, but you are known for compounding your mistakes on top of others. Sad.
 
I do not support, condone, nor in any way want to see the inevitable all-out race war happen in this country, but one would have to be blind not to see it coming, and coming from the right. Many innocent people on both sides will die. Children will die.

I suspect that it could happen as soon as Trump is kicked out of office and I suspect that he will enflame it. The right has been preparing for it, practicing for it for years. Anxious to refight the Civil War, anxious to kill a bunch of people they don't like without any achievable goal their war could possibly attain. But it will not be as easy as they think and their so-called army is not as large as they think. The vast majority of Americans will not be on their side. The government and its vast powers will not be on their side.

Biden and Harris are almost perfect for this moment. Biden, who has much to prove about his commitment to racial justice, will spare no expense at putting down the racist terrorists, and Harris, former AG, who cannot be accused of being soft on crime, will rush to the moment to spearhead harsh penalties for this insurrection.

Additionally, this isn't 1940. Communities of color are not unarmed, nor are conscious white people who will see this a a threat to their own and a threat to American democracy.

In fact, the more the right attacks the more it will ensure the outcome of the next election, ensuring the election of President Kamala Harris and a solidly democratic Congress.

Yeah, all those wanting to fulfill their wet dream of "The Turner Diaries" coming true may get what they wish for....but it won't be the ending they envision.
 
Of course you do. That's my point, son.

I'm not Euro trash, but obviously you are unable to comprehend anything you don't like.

Wrong again, but you are known for compounding your mistakes on top of others. Sad.

What a nonsense, I comprehend what is more, or less reality.

You just kind of like, what you like, and that's that.

You don't like the idea, of criminal genes, so they don't exist.

The problem is they do exist, and at different rates in different races, ouch.

But, out of sight out of mind.
 
Witold works hard to justify his superiority of genes and culture. It's nearly an obsession for him. Do not expect him to budge anymore than David Duke's ideas on Jews.

I'll pass this off to the neuroscience prof and see if she cares enough to condescend to reply.
Doubting. If people want to buy a bullshit racist nazi trope then reason can't help, especially complicated reasoning.

If you buy into it, you basically are too deluded to be helped IMO. Life is far too complex to draw such stupid lines.
"I see a color more than a billion other things I don't see, so shit we all do is coded in a couple dna allele." Felony stupid.
 
I'll pass this off to the neuroscience prof and see if she cares enough to condescend to reply.
Doubting. If people want to buy a bullshit racist nazi trope then reason can't help, especially complicated reasoning.

If you buy into it, you basically are too deluded to be helped IMO. Life is far too complex to draw such stupid lines.
"I see a color more than a billion other things I don't see, so shit we all do is coded in a couple dna allele." Felony stupid.

I guess scientific studies, are now racist & Nazi.

What a joke, it's actually anti-scientific to assume we're all the same.

Our brains & neurotransmitters, are likely as different as height can be.

That's to say, that as Ducthman & a Bushman are vastly different in stature.

But, a lot of groups, only have minimal differences, but differences, none the less.

It just happens to be the same applies for everything.

You just don't see the differences in brain & neurotransmitters, as a viasble difference, like height.
 
LMFAO, yes, there is a warrior gene, and to deny it is unscientific.

Sure, and NOT ALL Blacks in Africa are the same genetically, they are the most genetically diverse continent, after-all.

Besides, Africa tends to be more harsh on criminals, than New World Blacks.

If you commit crime in Africa, a lynch mob might chase you, and chop you up.

Africa therefore, doesn't have such leniance towards crime, as say African Americans or Jamaica has.

Although, once again Africa is diverse, and therefore is diverse in general.

So, this might not apply to all of Africa, either.

There is no such thing as a "warrior gene" That's just silly
 

No geneticist would today ever cite any of these bullshit papers, these studies were done years ago when people were still doing candidate gene studies which we now know only produce false positives. No one is allowed to publish these kinds of papers anymore, a typical SNP study has to have a MINIMUM of 100,000 people to be considered rigorous enough for publication in a respectable journal. These papers have significantly harmed the field of genetics because they led to an enormous waste of resources following false positives that could not be replicated in larger more well designed studies. The NIH will NO LONGER FUND any such study that only examines SNPs in a few genes, genetics studies MUST be discovery-based designs that use GWAS approaches, and when such studies were done all of the MAO, serotonin receptor and COMT SNP findings were NEVER replicated. Geneticists are super embarrassed now by these studies and anyone citing them immediately outs themselves in lacking any fundamental knowledge of the field of genetics.

Mike drop
 
I guess scientific studies, are now racist & Nazi.

What a joke, it's actually anti-scientific to assume we're all the same.

Our brains & neurotransmitters, are likely as different as height can be.

That's to say, that as Ducthman & a Bushman are vastly different in stature.

But, a lot of groups, only have minimal differences, but differences, none the less.

It just happens to be the same applies for everything.

You just don't see the differences in brain & neurotransmitters, as a viasble difference, like height.

Please post the studies that you claim define a warrior gene in Africans..

What you're talking about can only be environmental, not genetic.
 
No geneticist would today ever cite any of these bullshit papers, these studies were done years ago when people were still doing candidate gene studies which we now know only produce false positives. No one is allowed to publish these kinds of papers anymore, a typical SNP study has to have a MINIMUM of 100,000 people to be considered rigorous enough for publication in a respectable journal. These papers have significantly harmed the field of genetics because they led to an enormous waste of resources following false positives that could not be replicated in larger more well designed studies. The NIH will NO LONGER FUND any such study that only examines SNPs in a few genes, genetics studies MUST be discovery-based designs that use GWAS approaches, and when such studies were done all of the MAO, serotonin receptor and COMT SNP findings were NEVER replicated. Geneticists are super embarrassed now by these studies and anyone citing them immediately outs themselves in lacking any fundamental knowledge of the field of genetics.

Mike drop

See, it's political, no one is allowed to publish these kind of genetic studies anymore?

Why? Because it's not politically correct.

Leave your politics at the door.

If these are facts, which they are, then they are.

Which they are, obviously.

Because, the disparities shown are too great, to be just some "False positive"

What a joke.
 
No geneticist would today ever cite any of these bullshit papers, these studies were done years ago when people were still doing candidate gene studies which we now know only produce false positives. No one is allowed to publish these kinds of papers anymore, a typical SNP study has to have a MINIMUM of 100,000 people to be considered rigorous enough for publication in a respectable journal. These papers have significantly harmed the field of genetics because they led to an enormous waste of resources following false positives that could not be replicated in larger more well designed studies. The NIH will NO LONGER FUND any such study that only examines SNPs in a few genes, genetics studies MUST be discovery-based designs that use GWAS approaches, and when such studies were done all of the MAO, serotonin receptor and COMT SNP findings were NEVER replicated. Geneticists are super embarrassed now by these studies and anyone citing them immediately outs themselves in lacking any fundamental knowledge of the field of genetics.

Mike drop

This one was published rather recently.

So, you're obviusly full of it, saying it's not done anymore.

https://selfhacked.com/blog/about-mao-a-and-what-to-do-if-you-have-the-warrior-gene/

Evidence Based
This post has 26 references
4.4
/5
137
Is MAOA the “Warrior Gene”? High/Low Levels & Testing
Written by Ana Aleksic, MSc (Pharmacy) | Last updated: December 14, 2019
Nattha Wannissorn
Puya Yazdi
Medically reviewed by
Nattha Wannissorn, PhD, Puya Yazdi, MD

The 3R version, which produces less MAO-A, was found in 59% of Black men, 56% of Maori men (an aboriginal New Zealand group), 54% of Chinese men and 34% of Caucasian men.

The 2R version, which produces the least MAO-A, is found in 5.5% of Black men, 0.1% of Caucasian men, and 0.00067% of Asian men.
 
See, it's political, no one is allowed to publish these kind of genetic studies anymore?

Why? Because it's not politically correct.

Leave your politics at the door.

If these are facts, which they are, then they are.

Which they are, obviously.

Because, the disparities shown are too great, to be just some "False positive"

What a joke.

They don't get published nor even discussed because there is no science to them. There isn't even a gene for race.

Race Is Real, But It’s Not Genetic
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/race-is-real-but-its-not-genetic
 
They don't get published nor even discussed because there is no science to them. There isn't even a gene for race.

Race Is Real, But It’s Not Genetic
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/race-is-real-but-its-not-genetic

They're going by the classical definition.

Race = Sub-Species.

Which, doesn't mean we're the same.

What, they're saying is we aren't sub-species.

Which, may, or may not be true.

Dawkins believes we're separate sub-species, he's a race realist.

As for James Watson he believes in racial differences in IQ scores.
 
You clearly don't have a good footing in genetics, if you believe that.

polak "science"


These two Polaks are building a house. One of them is putting
on the siding. He picks up a nail, hammers it in. Picks up another
nail, throws it away. Picks up a nail, hammers it in. Picks up
another, throws it away. This goes on for a while, and finally his
friend comes over and asks him why he is throwing half of the nails
away.
He replies, "Those ones were pointed on the wrong end."
The buddy gets exasperated and says "You idiot, those are for
the other side of the house!"
 
They don't get published nor even discussed because there is no science to them. There isn't even a gene for race.

Race Is Real, But It’s Not Genetic
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/race-is-real-but-its-not-genetic

Don't fear. :) I have virtually unlimited access to the best and brightest, and all I need to have is the desire to make these people look dumb, and pick up the phone.

Then I do. Most people will not understand my preceding post, but they will see the erudition and expertise, and know this dude here is a racist fool who knows absolutely nothing

Or the next subject. Whatever I want, so long as I care. And I do care.

But mostly I care that Biden wins. That's pretty much it. But racist shit pisses me off, so I had to humiliate that poor slob.
 
They don't get published nor even discussed because there is no science to them. There isn't even a gene for race.

Race Is Real, But It’s Not Genetic
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/race-is-real-but-its-not-genetic

There actually isn't a consensus that we're the same sub-species.

Many Eastern European & Asian anthropologists, and geneticists believe we are different sub-species.

It's mostly just Western Europeans who believe we aren't.

Gee, I wonder why?

Maybe because Western Europeans are dumb goofs?

That would explain why they went berserk, looting & shooting half the World, in racist genocide.
before
allowing in a bunch of third-World riff-raffs, looting & shooting their own Nations, in anti-racist suicide.
 
They're going by the classical definition.

Race = Sub-Species.

Which, doesn't mean we're the same.

What, they're saying is we aren't sub-species.

Which, may, or may not be true.

Dawkins believes we're separate sub-species, he's a race realist.

As for James Watson he believes in racial differences in IQ scores.

Races are not a sub-species of humans. There is little difference between us. We are ALL Africanus.
 
Back
Top