CDC: Only 6% of deaths were from Covid only

tinfoil said:
Cites the link and still denies the fact the CDC reports.
For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.
Click to expand...

:lolup:

STOOOOOOOOOPID!
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
The reason it can be is because people are dying that aren't being attributed to Covid on their death certificate because they had no test.
When the statistical work is done later, much as they do with flu every year, the number of deaths from Covid will go up from the current count.
Click to expand...

No. When deaths due to cancer are listed as caused by Covid19, it's just fraud. It's bad data. The CDC is simply reporting what they receive from these fraudulent data reports. You are fear mongering.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
No, they don't test for Covid every time you go to a medical facility. That is just nonsense on your part. Testing depends on the facility and the availability of tests. And everyone that dies doesn't go to a medical facility before they die.

But you still haven't accounted for where those 200,000 extra deaths are coming from. Those deaths don't go away simply because you think they can't be Covid. Statistical work is done by looking at the likelihood of people dying and then comparing it to how many people actually died.
Click to expand...

There is money available to counties that report high covid19 numbers. It's just fraud for money.
 
Jerome said:
No one's saying you should panic, but it is inarguable that it's more deadly than influenza.
Click to expand...

Deadly to who?

Definitely deadly to 80 year olds. People in that age group have a one in seven chance of dying of *something* in a given year. It’s why we don’t see too many 100 year olds walking around.

It’s drops off pretty quickly after that. H1N1 [the Obama virus] was more deadly to kids and young people.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
No, they don't test for Covid every time you go to a medical facility. That is just nonsense on your part. Testing depends on the facility and the availability of tests. And everyone that dies doesn't go to a medical facility before they die.

But you still haven't accounted for where those 200,000 extra deaths are coming from. Those deaths don't go away simply because you think they can't be Covid. Statistical work is done by looking at the likelihood of people dying and then comparing it to how many people actually died.
Click to expand...
maybe not a doctors office - but the DO test for COVID /unless it's a medical emergency. I know this because my sis has to get a liver transplant and they constantly test a week or so ahead - mammogram,colonostomy (sp) transfusions/ you name it

i have no idea what this means (quote below) in terms of hard counts , and the 200k is YOUR figure which I questioned
Statistical work is done by looking at the likelihood of people dying and then comparing it to how many people actually died
Click to expand...
 
Darth Omar said:
Deadly to who?

Definitely deadly to 80 year olds. People in that age group have a one in seven chance of dying of *something* in a given year. It’s why we don’t see too many 100 year olds walking around.
Click to expand...


Deadly to 200,000 people, you fucking idiot.

LOTS of healthy people have died from this. More than quadruple have died than the worst flu season of the past decade, all in a span of 6 months while we're engaging in the tightest societal lockdown in recorded human history. Imagine if we just let this scorch through the country, unabated. In 1918, the flu only killed 500k Americans, despite little understanding of influenza viruses, dirty conditions everywhere, and a totally open economy.

If our economy had been wide open, we'd likely be at 1 million deaths in less than half the time it took the 1918 flu to kill 500k.

It’s drops off pretty quickly after that. H1N1 [the Obama virus] was more deadly to kids and young people.
Click to expand...

Don't look now, but you just openly admitted that Obama handled a more deadly disease FAR better than Trump handled a much less deadly disease (per your own stupid fucking analysis).

Congrats, douchebag, you played yourself.
 
Concart said:
This is way over their heads. I pointed out that there were four times more deaths in NYC than would be expected. They could never explain how that happened.
Click to expand...

PERHAPS THE FUCKING IDIOT CUOMO FORCING NURSING HOMES TO TAKE KNOWN COVID CARRIERS WAS INVOLVED; YA THINK, MAYBE???
 
Into the Night said:
Lie. The influenza virus series has many variants. Some more deadly, others less so, others not deadly at all. Compositional error fallacy.
Click to expand...

Again, bullshit. 675,000 died of the 1918 influenza virus in the U.S., this despite no lockdown, despite it being the deadliest flu ever, and despite most people engaging in none of the safety measures we do now. We're at 180,000 - 200k dead now, and likely to 300k by year's end, despite the most unprecedented economic lockdowns and modern medical therapies.

You don't know what you're talking about, but that's nothing new. Your asshole works overtime attempting to make valid points.
 
Jerome said:
Deadly to 200,000 people, you fucking idiot.

LOTS of healthy people have died from this. More than quadruple have died than the worst flu season of the past decade, all in a span of 6 months while we're engaging in the tightest societal lockdown in recorded human history. Imagine if we just let this scorch through the country, unabated. In 1918, the flu only killed 500k Americans, despite little understanding of influenza viruses, dirty conditions everywhere, and a totally open economy.

If our economy had been wide open, we'd likely be at 1 million deaths in less than half the time it took the 1918 flu to kill 500k.



Don't look now, but you just openly admitted that Obama handled a more deadly disease FAR better than Trump handled a much less deadly disease (per your own stupid fucking analysis).

Congrats, douchebag, you played yourself.
Click to expand...

Google the age break down of deaths by/with/whatever COVID and come back better prepared.
 
The 6 percent refers to the percentage of all deaths ,includes cancers, car accidents, leprosy and right wing suicides.
 
Jerome said:
Oh I see, people don't count as people once they hit a certain age.

TERRIFIC fucking point to make on a forum full of senior citizens.
Click to expand...

READ THE OP LINK.

DEATHS SPECIFICALLY FROM COVID ARE A FRACTION OF WHAT WE ARE BEING TOLD...
 
Is that supposed to be comforting? Covid weaponizes other diseases making it super deadly. Big win for the hoax crowd. :laugh:
 
Nordberg said:
The 6 percent refers to the percentage of all deaths ,includes cancers, car accidents, leprosy and right wing suicides.
Click to expand...

IT'S ALL DEATHS WHERE COVID WAS CITED AS A CAUSE....THE .06 WERE HOW MANY WERE JUST COVID = A LITTLE OVER 9,000...NATIONWIDE.


THERE WILL BE SOME VERY PISSED OFF AMERICANS IF THIS GETS AROUND....MILLIONS OF THEM.
 
tinfoil said:
Prove it. I provided the evidence that only 6% of the so called deaths from Covid are in fact from Covid
Click to expand...

No, that's not what those statistics say at all. It says that only six percent occurred in people without higher risk factors. Do you lie for a living? I hope not, because your lies are totally transparent. Even you are not stupid enough to believe what you just said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top