gfm7175
Mega MAGA
its republicans who claim Christianity
my christian friends are fine with science
Bigotry. Plenty of Democrats claim Christianity as well.
its republicans who claim Christianity
my christian friends are fine with science
I am a Christian and I believe God gave us science to understand our world. American far right wing conservobots are the problem.
Very few Christians are anti-science in every aspect of their lives, but religious people are more likely to deny certain scientific facts that call religion into question. Atheists don't because they're not emotionally invested in maintaining religious ideas.
This is the cry of the scientifically illiterate warmizombie, i.e. "physics doesn't apply to earth."It doesn't. Blackbodies. Earth is not one.
I'll repeat, warmizombies frequently skirt the laws of thermodynamics in attempts to rationalize their Global Warming faith.I'll repeat. Creationists frequently refer to the laws of thermodynamics in attempts to prove their religious case.
I'm the one that claims that no dictionary owns the English language. Which dictionary do you claim owns English?You're the one who claims dictionaries don't contain definitions, aren't you?
Correct. I will add, however, the caveot that certain young-earth Creationism presents certain challenges to scientific consistency, e.g. How are we able to see stars that are millions of light years away if the light hasn't had millions of years to travel?Creationism is not anti-science.
Except that most are lying even about that. Their belief in Global Warming, for example, is profound, as is their belief in the Climate deity, the Greenhouse Effect miracle, etc...Most self-proclaimed "Atheists" ARE religious... They believe that there are no god/s, a theistic belief in and of itself.
Can you give me an example of a "scientific fact" that Christians are apt to deny?Very few Christians are anti-science in every aspect of their lives, but religious people are more likely to deny certain scientific facts that call religion into question. Atheists don't because they're not emotionally invested in maintaining religious ideas.
Can you give me an example of a "scientific fact" that Christians are apt to deny?
Most self-proclaimed "Atheists" ARE religious... They believe that there are no god/s, a theistic belief in and of itself.
Darwin's Theory is not science. It is an unfalsifiable theory. It is speculation about the past. If you'd like to discuss it I'm a huge fan.Evolution.
No, Atheism is the lack of a belief in gods. It's not the belief that there are no gods.
Darwin's Theory is not science. It is an unfalsifiable theory. It is speculation about the past. If you'd like to discuss it I'm a huge fan.
Genetics is science, it is a collection of falsifiable models that predict nature. I don't know of any Christians that deny these models.
![]()
Exactly spot on!
![]()
You should listen to me on this. No it is not. You should learn what falsifiable means. Darwin's Evolution is a great theory; I put a lot of stock into it. It's not falsifiable. It's not science.First of all, it is falsifiable.
No. To be science a model must first be falsifiable. Then it must survive the scientific method with a direct test on the null hypothesis. We do not have time machines. We cannot directly verify the null hypothesis. It cannot be science.If you mean that it can't 100% be proven true or false, that's all scientific theories.
This is why you need to be clear when you speak/write.Secondly, it's not just speculation about the past
Yes. The theory is brilliant. Fundamentalist Christians will tell you that they don't believe that these small changes we observe will ever amount to big changes such as new organs, new limbs, etc... That belief runs counter to Darwin's Theory (which is not science) but is entirely accepting of all science and observations.Some species evolve fast enough that we're able to observe the changes happening.
You should listen to me on this. No it is not. You should learn what falsifiable means. Darwin's Evolution is a great theory; I put a lot of stock into it. It's not falsifiable. It's not science.
No. To be science a model must first be falsifiable. Then it must survive the scientific method with a direct test on the null hypothesis. We do not have time machines. We cannot directly verify the null hypothesis. It cannot be science.
For this reason, no speculation about the past is science. Science predicts nature. It is inherently future tense.
This is why you need to be clear when you speak/write.
If you are talking about Darwin's Theory on the Origin of Species then it is entirely speculation.
If you are talking about genetics and evolution occurring today then yes, some of that is science (randomness of mutations is merely statistical mathematics) and Christians have no problem accepting that.
Yes. The theory is brilliant. Fundamentalist Christians will tell you that they don't believe that these small changes we observe will ever amount to big changes such as new organs, new limbs, etc... That belief runs counter to Darwin's Theory (which is not science) but is entirely accepting of all science and observations.
You should listen to me on this. No it is not. You should learn what falsifiable means. Darwin's Evolution is a great theory; I put a lot of stock into it. It's not falsifiable. It's not science.
No. To be science a model must first be falsifiable. Then it must survive the scientific method with a direct test on the null hypothesis. We do not have time machines. We cannot directly verify the null hypothesis. It cannot be science.
For this reason, no speculation about the past is science. Science predicts nature. It is inherently future tense.
This is why you need to be clear when you speak/write.
If you are talking about Darwin's Theory on the Origin of Species then it is entirely speculation.
If you are talking about genetics and evolution occurring today then yes, some of that is science (randomness of mutations is merely statistical mathematics) and Christians have no problem accepting that.
Yes. The theory is brilliant. Fundamentalist Christians will tell you that they don't believe that these small changes we observe will ever amount to big changes such as new organs, new limbs, etc... That belief runs counter to Darwin's Theory (which is not science) but is entirely accepting of all science and observations.
Correct.No, Atheism is the lack of a belief in gods. It's not the belief that there are no gods.
Correct.
My point was that many people who call themselves "atheists" are not actually atheists (as atheism is being defined here). Instead, they spout off that they believe that there are no god/s. IBD then correctly chimed in that many of those "atheists" even lie about THAT.
Can you give me an example of a "scientific fact" that Christians are apt to deny?
Evolution.