Somebody name one

They have the Proud Boys in there and they aren’t white supremacists. We’ve already decided the Wolverine militia isn’t. I wonder how many more are misidentified as whites supremacists?

And how do they manage to stay so far below the radar? Why aren’t there ten thousands clips of these groups terrorizing people and destroying property like their left wing counterparts?

You have ten thousand clips of left-wing counterparts terrorizing people and destroying property?
 
Then, according to your fellow dumbasses in the left, you must be a racist!

Why the fuck should I care about them? I am my own. We all share some of the same values.

Wrong Tard Boy; ADL is a far left Jewish organization that has shown that it has very low standards for factual dissemination. Try to be less dishonest and stupid.

I'm sure you have proof of that.

How should I know Tard Boy? I just heard of the group when Biden bloviated it on the debate stage. I am still waiting for you to prove they can. Too stupid to comprehend the obvious Tard Boy? Be better.

You can't answer a simple question? That's what I thought.
 
You cherrypick what you want - whether it's that study, or the DHS findings regarding white supremacy.

The protests are mainly peaceful. Sorry - that's just a fact. It just takes a few agitators to create riot-like conditions; start a fire here, break a few windows there, and suddenly a protest attended by thousands is a "riot," because of less than 10 people who are creating havoc.

Society hasn't broken down. And white supremacist groups and individuals are still the greatest threat.

I grow weary of lying leftist assholes telling us how peaceful these mobs were when so many cities lay in ruin after their rioting, burning and looting.

tenor.gif
 
Don't you think it's a bid odd that there is more hysteria about Islamic terrorism than there is about white supremacist violence, given the probability of each?

I find it odd that a mental case like you isn't locked up in a padded cell and kept under constant watch.
 
I grow weary of lying leftist assholes telling us how peaceful these mobs were when so many cities lay in ruin after their rioting, burning and looting.

tenor.gif

So many cities "lay in ruin?"

My goodness. MAYBE you could say Portland, though even that's a stretch for that characterization.

Such hysteria.
 
People who live in NYC always say that they have no idea what city Fox is talking about when they characterize their home town.

Fox makes it sound like complete anarchy - a dystopian vision of lawlessness, burning and streets that residents are terrified to walk.

People who live there say it's just like it always was except for the pandemic-induced isolation, and they walk safely wherever they want to.
 
You cherrypick what you want - whether it's that study, or the DHS findings regarding white supremacy.

I put up a link to the study YOU CITED! I then gave examples from it as to why it's flawed and the findings YOU quoted are erroneous. Then you come back with some red herring argument coupled to an ad hominem and expect that to work? Get real. Your claims are bogus and your argument is vapid and baseless. I gave examples, links, and specific claims proving it so.

The protests are mainly peaceful. Sorry - that's just a fact. It just takes a few agitators to create riot-like conditions; start a fire here, break a few windows there, and suddenly a protest attended by thousands is a "riot," because of less than 10 people who are creating havoc.

Society hasn't broken down. And white supremacist groups and individuals are still the greatest threat.

The larger the protest, the more likely it turned violent. That's consistent with the behavior of the radical Left. They aren't generally violent in small numbers. They get violent when they turn into a large mob. A dozen people holding a "protest" on a street corner for a couple of hours is not analogous or comparable to one where thousands of violent protesters take over a downtown, burn buildings, and loot. Even a mostly peaceful protest by thousands where some clash with police or those nearby that object to their views, isn't equal.
Large mobs also do other activities even when "peaceful." They spread trash and graffiti.

protest.signs_.png


YQD4BET4GFC3VGV4LHWV6QPCPQ.png


Cleaning that up takes time and money. It disrupts businesses and individuals. It creates an eyesore. Also, it isn't peaceful.

Society broke down in Seattle with the CHOP / CHAZ. It's done likewise at several copycat sites. Yes, the breakdown lasted days to weeks rather than permanently, but society collapsed within those areas during the time they existed.

Also, even if only a small portion of the protesters smash things, start fires, etc., they are using the rest as cover for their activities. Also, those other protesters do little or nothing to stop those who are being criminal, violent, etc., giving them their tact consent by doing so.
 
So all of a sudden after decades of not having them just magically appeared all these white supremacists or were they at secret cabal hiding in the shadows waiting for the right time to strike?

The white supremacists groups have always been forming everywhere. Nothing new.

They generally just stay underground. Take a peek at Stormfront. :whoa:
 
The Proud Boys arent a Fascist group at all. They celebrate traditional western manhood. They are the exact opposite of ....THE SOY BOYS!..LOL They work hard,...they drink beer, ..they dont do PC....they dont just TAKE IT and remain silent. They are traditional American men in otherwords instead of the fagged out pansy ass incel looking freaks the left has been trying to create over the last 30 years.

I put them in the same category as Log Cabin Republicans, nomsayin'? LOL!

At least they're patriotic.

I ain't mad at 'em. They can do their Fruity Pebbles antics all they want!
 
You cherrypick what you want - whether it's that study, or the DHS findings regarding white supremacy.

The protests are mainly peaceful. Sorry - that's just a fact. It just takes a few agitators to create riot-like conditions; start a fire here, break a few windows there, and suddenly a protest attended by thousands is a "riot," because of less than 10 people who are creating havoc.

Society hasn't broken down. And white supremacist groups and individuals are still the greatest threat.
so these imaginary "10 people" do all the rioting? it's not a "riot like condition" -it's a riot.

street violence is condemnable- no if ands or buts
 
I put up a link to the study YOU CITED! I then gave examples from it as to why it's flawed and the findings YOU quoted are erroneous. Then you come back with some red herring argument coupled to an ad hominem and expect that to work? Get real. Your claims are bogus and your argument is vapid and baseless. I gave examples, links, and specific claims proving it so.



The larger the protest, the more likely it turned violent. That's consistent with the behavior of the radical Left. They aren't generally violent in small numbers. They get violent when they turn into a large mob. A dozen people holding a "protest" on a street corner for a couple of hours is not analogous or comparable to one where thousands of violent protesters take over a downtown, burn buildings, and loot. Even a mostly peaceful protest by thousands where some clash with police or those nearby that object to their views, isn't equal.
Large mobs also do other activities even when "peaceful." They spread trash and graffiti.

protest.signs_.png


YQD4BET4GFC3VGV4LHWV6QPCPQ.png


Cleaning that up takes time and money. It disrupts businesses and individuals. It creates an eyesore. Also, it isn't peaceful.

Society broke down in Seattle with the CHOP / CHAZ. It's done likewise at several copycat sites. Yes, the breakdown lasted days to weeks rather than permanently, but society collapsed within those areas during the time they existed.

Also, even if only a small portion of the protesters smash things, start fires, etc., they are using the rest as cover for their activities. Also, those other protesters do little or nothing to stop those who are being criminal, violent, etc., giving them their tact consent by doing so.

I didn't think my response was ad hominem. I said you cherrypicked - and I do think you're using more narrow elements of the studies to bolster your argument.

It IS a small portion of the protestors. We don't need studies to confirm that. You look at any protest of thousands - it's generally a small % that decide to break windows, start fires or instigate violence.

And of course those agitators are using the rest for cover. There, we agree. They're hijacking the protests and the agenda of the protestors. Their agendas are very different, and often have little to do w/ the protest.

And I wholly reject the argument that it's "tacit consent" to not intervene. I don't expect peaceful protestors to insert themselves into violent situations in an attempt to play the hero and stop things. I like to think I would, but it's not an expectation I have for people who just go out to protest something and show support for a cause.
 
I grow weary of lying leftist assholes telling us how peaceful these mobs were when so many cities lay in ruin after their rioting, burning and looting.

tenor.gif

Few things are more tiresome than the incessant, exaggerated cries of leftist inspired doom. If right wingers acquired some scholarship or even mere information and shed their talking points they might find something useful to say.
 
Why the fuck should I care about them? I am my own. We all share some of the same values.

Triggered much Tard Boy?

I'm sure you have proof of that.

Ironic coming from a Tard Boy that never has proof of anything he bloviates stupidly about.

What Happened to the ADL?

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10943/anti-defamation-league-adl

You can't answer a simple question? That's what I thought.

This from the retard who still hasn't proven that SOME white racists can join. I am pretty sure that was an answer. You really are too stupid for words Tard Boy. Try to be less dishonest and stupid.
 
Back
Top