WTF is a "just economy'?

no worries said:
Hitler?
What does Adolf have to do with my comment?
But since you mentioned Hitler.

"Adolf Hitler's political views were formed during three periods, namely (1) his years as a poverty-stricken young man in Vienna and Munich prior to World War I, during which he turned to nationalist-oriented political pamphlets and antisemitic newspapers out of distrust for mainstream newspapers and political parties".

Remind you of anyone?
Remind you of any cult?

(2) the closing months of World War I when Germany lost the war, as Hitler is said to have developed his extreme nationalism during this time, desiring to "save" Germany from both external and internal "enemies" who in his view betrayed it".

Remind you of anyone?
Remind you of any cult?

(3) and the 1920s, during which his early political career began and he wrote Mein Kampf. Hitler formally renounced his Austrian citizenship on 7 April 1925, but did not acquire German citizenship until almost seven years later; thereby allowing him to run for public office. Hitler was influenced by Benito Mussolini, who was appointed Prime Minister of Italy in October 1922 after his "March on Rome".

Interesting, appointed?

"Although Hitler realized that his ascension to power required the use of the Weimar Republic's parliamentary system (founded on democratic principles), he never intended for the continuation of democratic governance once in control. Contrarily, Hitler proclaimed that he would "destroy democracy with the weapons of democracy".

Remind you of anyone?
Remind you of any cult?
Click to expand...

Pretty much all dictators use ‘democracy’ to get into power. Typically, they do it by rigging elections. Ever wonder how Putin gets overwhelming elected?

Remind you of anyone lol?

Or in the case of Islamists, once legitimately voted in, they jettison democracy in favor of sharia.

Hitler espoused a kind of ethno-nationalism that extolled the ‘Aryan race’ [whatever the hell that even meant] whereas Trump advocates economic nationalism. Different as day and night.

Economic nationalism is essentially common sense nationalism that doesn’t GAF about racial crap one way or another. If a given policy doesn’t benefit the country first—who, exactly, is it intended to benefit? Questions like that will point you to economic nationalism.

That you would make such an error is an indication you know little about Hitler or America First nationalism.
 
Bigdog said:
All of which has nothing to do with Hitler's creation of a massive Welfare State, including forced mandatory national health insurance (Obamacare).
Click to expand...

Wow, Another "genius" comment, that's why you put Limbaughtomy's picture next to your name.
Germany's healthcare/retirement/pension system was created in 1883 by Otto Van Bismarck.
6 years before Hitler was even born.
By 1910's, 90% of German citizen's were covered.
Repeating teabagger BS.
 
no worries said:
Really?
Small/medium farmers sure do, they deserve help.
Agi-business farmers do pretty well on their own but Dotard gave them the most $$$ on top of their profits.

"The Agriculture Department initially announced a $125,000 limit on the amount any one farm could get, but every Trump deal seems to have a gimmick in it to give a special break to the slickest operators".

"The slickum in this deal is that assorted members of a family are allowed to claim that they’re owners of the same farm and thus get bailout bucks — even if they do no actual farming and live in New York City"!

"One Missouri farm family, for example, got $2.8 million worth of subsidy love from Trump, and more than 80 families topped half-a-million in payments".

"Meanwhile, the great majority of farmers have gotten zilch from Trump — and 80 percent of eligible grain farmers (the smaller producers most endangered by his bad policies) have received less than $5,000.
Click to expand...

Obummer did the same thing.
 
Into the Night said:
Trump is not trying to rig any election. Democrats did that.
Click to expand...

It's not democrats that filed over 50 court cases over the election.
It's not democrats who are inviting state legislators to the white house.
It's not democrats calling governors.
It's not democrats calling secretaries of state.
THAT'S your baby, dear leader.
 
Into the Night said:
No, he wasn't.
Click to expand...

SO, FOS.

Houston 1980 debate.

“Rather than talking about putting up a fence, why don’t we work out some recognition of our mutual problems, make it possible for them to come here legally with a work permit,” he said. “And then while they’re working and earning here, they pay taxes here. And when they want to go back they can go back.”

The border, he said, should be open “both ways” – and border security policy should take into account the economic challenges facing Mexico.

Reagan’s words that night, and his stance in countless other public and private statements as president, contrast starkly with the false history lesson President Trump offered Friday in an early morning tweet, hours before a potential government shutdown over funding for the president’s border wall.

“Even President Ronald Reagan tried for 8 years to build a Border Wall, or Fence, and was unable to do so,” the president wrote in a tweet. “Others also have tried. We will get it done, one way or the other!”
 
dukkha said:
*SMH*
Revenue is revenue and expenditures are expenditures. Tax cut revenue paid for the lower tax rates
because of increased receipts even at lower rates of taxation. It's called "revenue neutral" tax cuts

Spending is a different facet - deficit spending causes the deficit to grow
Spending causes deficits even with revenue neutral tax cuts, Blame Congress
Click to expand...

Increased receipts because of lower taxation?
Revenue neutral tax cuts?

Sounds like a teabagger debate statement in every debate since 1980
Another lie.

Yeah blame congress for passing tax cuts, when the country can't afford it.
 
Darth Omar said:
Pretty much all dictators use ‘democracy’ to get into power. Typically, they do it by rigging elections. Ever wonder how Putin gets overwhelming elected?

Remind you of anyone lol?

Or in the case of Islamists, once legitimately voted in, they jettison democracy in favor of sharia.

Hitler espoused a kind of ethno-nationalism that extolled the ‘Aryan race’ [whatever the hell that even meant] whereas Trump advocates economic nationalism. Different as day and night.

Economic nationalism is essentially common sense nationalism that doesn’t GAF about racial crap one way or another. If a given policy doesn’t benefit the country first—who, exactly, is it intended to benefit? Questions like that will point you to economic nationalism.

That you would make such an error is an indication you know little about Hitler or America First nationalism.
Click to expand...

It's clear you don't.

"Typically, they do it by rigging elections. Ever wonder how Putin gets overwhelming elected"?
Yep, he lies about his opponent, has them arrested, closes polling locations, eliminates voters, eliminates ballots, tries to strong arm the people running elections.

"Remind you of anyone lol"?
TRUMP.

"Nationalism"?
Wasn't a point in my comment, even though Dotard is an ignorant one.
 
no worries said:
It's clear you don't.

"Typically, they do it by rigging elections. Ever wonder how Putin gets overwhelming elected"?
Yep, he lies about his opponent, has them arrested, closes polling locations, eliminates voters, eliminates ballots, tries to strong arm the people running elections.

"Remind you of anyone lol"?
TRUMP.

"Nationalism"?
Wasn't a point in my comment, even though Dotard is an ignorant one.
Click to expand...

You’re delusional.

Part of your rant was about Hitler’s nationalism. Yes, Hitler was a nationalist but anyone who claims a parallel between Hitler’s nationalism and Trumpian nationalism is ignorant of one or both.
 
Irish said:
Obummer did the same thing.
Click to expand...

Is it always the same with teabaggers, "Obama did it too"?

When the Obama administration used its authority under a Depression-era law to give struggling farmers some extra help, Congress got mad and passed another law to prevent that from happening again.

Earlier this year, the legislators changed their minds and restored the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s ability to use the financing authority ― just in time for President Donald Trump to dish out billions to farmers harmed by his trade agenda.
 
no worries said:
I wish stupidity was painful, teabaggers would be in the ICU's all over the country.
"Are you one of those that thinks the government provides a service or produces a good that generates revenue"?
Evidently, teabaggers do that's why they pass out corporate tax cuts like skittles.
The government doesn't provide funding for highways?
Are still working on that elusive GED?
August 21, 2019

Senate committee passes largest highway bill in history.
“(The bill) will grow our economy, improve road safety, expedite important projects, and enhance the quality of life for the American people,” Committee Chairman and co-sponsor John Barrasso (R-Wyoming) said at the hearing July 30. “Our bipartisan legislation will help rural communities in Wyoming and major urban areas around the country.”
“The bill cuts Washington red tape, so road construction can get done faster, better, cheaper, and smarter,” Barrasso said.
Click to expand...

Stupidity is painful. The problem is the stupidity on the left is painful for those of us that have to deal with it.

No, the government doesn't provide the funding. Taxpayers provide the funding. The government gets to misuse it for political purposes.
 
no worries said:
They may as well be they're letting their product rot in the fields, they're pouring their milk down the drain, they have to, they have no market, thanks to Dotard's China tariffs and teabaggers refusal to help any small businesses, including small farmers.

"Government payments (excluding crop insurance payments) to farms have fluctuated since 1933, from a low of $1.5 billion in 1949 to $32.1 billion in 2000. In 1949, government payments made up 1.4% of total net farm income — a measure of profit — while in 2000 government payments made up 45.8% of such profits".

"In 2019, farms received $22.6 billion in government payments, representing 20.4% of $111.1 billion in profits".

Let alone $46 billion Dotard handed out this year.

Farm subsidies were meant to stabilize farms, now it's in their profit margin.

CLEARLY, you haven't done anything but play video games, watch FOX and reruns of your dear leader ego rallies.
Click to expand...

Clearly, you've never done anything but kissed left wing ass.
 
Bubba said:
You need a license to drive a car. You need a license to fish.

Why shouldn't you need a license to pump out babies??
Click to expand...

My primary issue with RD's post, specifically with the portion about single mothers, is that when she was pregnant, bleeding hearts like RD scream and yell about what she does with her body as her sole choice. However, when the one they say has the sole choice with her body, therefore the sole responsibility for anything related to that choice, can't afford her choice, they have no problem demanding those of us told to butt out of what she did with her body be forced to fund it for her.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top