Can you impeach a former president ?

[Son of the Revolution]

You have used up your allocated time for today, try again on Wednesday afternoon, when President Biden is office and the POS trump is nothing more than bad History with a mountain of legal problems.
See ya then, Skippy.....

Beijing Biden is NOT my president asshole

 

[CASPER]

Beijing Biden is NOT my president asshole

No one cares, go get a pudding cup, Skippy.

 

[Truth Detector]

Seriously are you this dumb?

Seriously, are you this fucking retarded? That was rhetorical asshat. Everyone reading your posts can see what a mentally unstable worthless piece of shit troll you are.

 

[Truth Detector]

Bob is an idiot. He thinks he's being cute.

Convicting trump also opens him up to losing quite a few post presidential perks if the Senate opts to.

Trump will NEVER be convicted you dumb cunt. He hasn't committed any crimes morons.

You fucking retards on the left have been parroting that lame stupid lie for more than four years now. Get your heads out of your assholes; your tiny brains could use some oxygen.

 

[Nordberg]

you fucking liberals started this virus... you fucking liberals started this violence this past summer using antifa and blm...
you fuckers do realize that without the 2nd you don't have the first...

Wow, I guess we have Parler rejects here. I wondered when they would show up.

 

[Son of the Revolution]

No one cares, go get a pudding cup, Skippy.

lame like your whole life and family

 

[CASPER]

lame like your whole life and family

Sorry, your time is up for today, you are dismissed.

 

[Truth Detector]

I realize that but I am just repeating what the law says which is that a president cannot be removed from office once he is impeached until the conclusion of a senate trial.

It mentions nothing about a term expiring so it would be a Supreme court decision.

The point is, the impeachment process is for REMOVING someone from office. Trump will no longer occupy that office after January 20th so this whole process is a CLOWN show.

 

[Son of the Revolution]

Wow, I guess we have Parler rejects here. I wondered when they would show up.

so you are another fucking asshole that likes censoring people

 

[Nordberg]

so you are another fucking asshole that likes censoring people

Parler was advocating riots and endangering people's lives. I am sure you do not know that free speech is not unabridged. Lots of speech is prohibited.
Ah, the right-wing anger and insults. You do not have to wonder why you get no respect. All you bring is anger. Read up on free speech. Use this for self-education.

 

[Nordberg]

He can't be removed since he's leaving but he can be kept from running again. Impeachment was also begun while he was still president and not the former.

Impeachment ended while he was in office. The senate trial is what needs to be done.

 

[Walt]

Last try:

Of course the SC can review it if they choose to review it. The SC, not Congress, decides what actions taken pursuant to The Constitution will or won't be reviewed.

What do you suppose would happen if the Senate convicted Trump, banning him from running again, on the theory that the Removal Clause applies not only to sitting Presidents
but also to former Presidents when impeached before they left office? (This by the way is what distinguishes Trump from the other former Presidents I brought up). Trump would appeal is what would happen.

The SC would then lay down the law on the question we are debating and the Senate would suck it up. Could get the result it wanted or maybe not.

The Constitution says that the Supreme Court can not review it. The Supreme Court agrees that is what the Constitution says.

trump might try to appeal the decision, but I doubt the Supreme Court would even waste their time by rejecting it.

 

[martin]

The Constitution says that the Supreme Court can not review it. The Supreme Court agrees that is what the Constitution says.

trump might try to appeal the decision, but I doubt the Supreme Court would even waste their time by rejecting it.

Kindly show us the language in The Constitution that forbids a SC review, also kindly show us the language by which the SC agrees it may not review.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Can you impeach a former president ? Can a private citizen be impeached ?

Not according to the Constitution, but the commies have long ignored that.

 

[Sailor]

This is where it says that the House of Representatives has sole power to decide who to impeach.



This is where it says that the Senate has sole power to decide who to try.



This is the only limit placed on the Congress when it comes to impeachment, and that is there are only two punishments possible: removal from office, and banning from future offices.

Now that I have shown you that the sole power of who is and is not impeached is with the House, you prove your claim that they do not have that power when it comes to newly private citizens.

You have no proven shit. Just stroking your own little ego. It really is all you have.

 

[Walt]

Kindly show us the language in The Constitution that forbids a SC review, also kindly show us the language by which the SC agrees it may not review.

The House of Representatives...shall have the sole Power of Impeachment....The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments

"Sole" means that it cannot be appealed.

 

[Walt]

Not according to the Constitution, but the commies have long ignored that.

Where in the Constitution does it say that?

 

[Sailor]

Where in the Constitution does it say that?

Learn to fucking read. It has been pointed out to you and other dumb fuck Democrats on this board time and time again.

 

[Concart]

Trump was impeached twice while still in office. Next stupid question?

 

[Sailor]

Trump was impeached twice while still in office. Next stupid question?

I am sure you will posting again.