We have to split up!

Then why can’t he defend his shit ?

You said libertarianism is "crap" because you have the educational attainment of a fifth grader and the intelligence of scum on the side of an aquarium. I said that libertarianism is unworkable because human nature is ignoble. Sign off, you drunken, shriveled up twat.
 
You Never Defend your idiot ideas

They are utterly failed ideas throughout mankind’s history

Even you admitted they don’t work when applied to humans dude


Give us a time in history that they did work


Clue: you won’t find one

You're in over your head. You are among the five posters in this forum who have the least understanding of political philosophy and history. You're just not a smart person. You don't bother to try to educate yourself. Then you shart your monumentally misinformed diarrhea all over the rest of us in posts that are unintelligible and appear to have been written by a gnat.
 
Last edited:
See

You know it can’t work when applied to humans


In other words a crap set of ideas

And right on time, this drunken dumbass starts responding to posts you've already responded to and talking to yourself in untagged posts in an embarrassing attempt to make yourself relevant and beg for attention from anonymous strangers on the internet. You're not only very, very dumb. You're also a fucking loser.
 
You're in over your head. You are among the five posters in this forum who have the least understanding of political philosophy and history. You're just not a smart person. You don't bother to try to educate yourself. Then you shart your monumentally misinformed diarrhea all over the rest of us in posts that are unintelligible and appear to have been written by a gnat.

Utter failure little boy


Nothing but personal insults


Your a failure in debate
 
You said libertarianism is "crap" because you have the educational attainment of a fifth grader and the intelligence of scum on the side of an aquarium. I said that libertarianism is unworkable because human nature is ignoble. Sign off, you drunken, shriveled up twat.

Which means it cannot function in a human world


Just like the infantile lustings for honorable kings


It’s fantasy

You said it clearly


Now your mad at me that you proved it a crap set of ideas
 
Unworkable economic ideas ?


They keep saving us from failed Republican crap ideas


History agrees with me not you
Example?

No socialist country is economically viable.

I have little respects for Republicans these days.
 
No socialist country is economically viable.


Canada seems to be doing fine. France too. Germany. South Korea. Japan. Scandinavia. Australia. New Zealand. Most of Europe. Israel....these aren't countries that are unviable.

In fact, we are doing worse economically than those countries right now.

The United States isn't economically viable when you have power companies in the energy-rich state of Texas telling their customers to stop doing business with them.
 
Utter failure little boy


Nothing but personal insults


Your a failure in debate

You haven't debated anything. Ever. In all the months I've been a JPP member, I have never seen you formulate an argument. You hate Republicans. You know very little. You're repetitive. And the word you're searching for is "you're".
 
Which means it cannot function in a human world


Just like the infantile lustings for honorable kings


It’s fantasy

You said it clearly


Now your mad at me that you proved it a crap set of ideas

I have no idea why you're lusting after honorable kings. You're a fucking weirdo.

I never used the word "fantasy". Apparently you're fingering yourself and whispering King Arthur's name or some such weird shit. Keep it to yourself.

Lastly, sweetie, you don't have the ability to make me "mad". You are inconsequential. That's a nice way of expressing my opinion about your "contributions" to this forum. And the word you're searching for is "you're".
 
Pollyanna optimism for the salvation of fifty-state America is so obviously unwarranted at this point that to harbor it really has to be some form of craven cowardice.

It must represent an absolute unwillingness or inability to accept the reality that our experiment of having two incompatible nations sharing the same borders and the same government
is now proven to be the total failure that the founders should have foreseen when they made one nation out of slave states and free states.

It was a genuinely stupid idea then, and now, it's become a dangerous one as our citizens are becoming increasingly willing to slaughter one another on the streets.

Are Cinnabar and I the only ones with eyes and ears? Isn't it obviously how much Americans genuinely hate one another?
I find it amazing that some flower child Democrats still believe that Republicans are human when it's so obvious that they are devolved mutant trumpanzees with no positive human qualities whatsoever.

Now let's hear it from the forum saints who claim not to hate anybody. Fuck you. If you can't hate trumpanzees, then they clearly don't offend you enough, and if you can tolerate them that easily, I hate to say it---
your process of devolution is probably well underway.

Cinnabar came up with the word...Blueexit.
It wasn't my word, but I'll embrace it.
It's as good a word as any.
Now, for the love of humanity, let's get it the fuck done.
Otherwise we're like astronomy majors in college...we're taking up space.
 
Canada seems to be doing fine. France too. Germany. South Korea. Japan. Scandinavia. Australia. New Zealand. Most of Europe. Israel....these aren't countries that are unviable.

In fact, we are doing worse economically than those countries right now.

The United States isn't economically viable when you have power companies in the energy-rich state of Texas telling their customers to stop doing business with them.

None of those are socialist countries: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/


Nice job on the goalposts. :thup:
 
None of those are socialist countries:

Great! Then it's not extremist to adopt their socialist policies, it would be extremist to oppose them.

So I take it, based on that, that you support Medicare for All and free public colleges since Canada has basically the same systems and you claim it's not socialism.
 
None of those are socialist countries: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/


Nice job on the goalposts. :thup:

What the fuck does DU consider a socialist nation if not a nation with components of socialism?
Even our sorry-ass, socially regressive nation has significant elements of socialism: Medicare, Social Security, Unemployment Insurance, and the VA come to mind.

It's one thing for the plethora of ignorant white trash on our forum to not know the meaning of socialism, but DU is not one of those.
He's actually been to fucking school from the content of his posts, whether I agree with them or not.
Therefore, if DU knows but posts bullshit anyway, he's being deliberately disingenuous, leaving us with the task of guessing his motives.
 
Great! Then it's not extremist to adopt their socialist policies, it would be extremist to oppose them.

So I take it, based on that, that you support Medicare for All and free public colleges since Canada has basically the same systems and you claim it's not socialism.

I've often said that without unlimited resources, a federal Constitutional republic fueled by regulated capitalism and having a socialist safety net for the sick, elderly and children is the best the world can hope to have.

Your leaps of logic are interesting. Is it because you are more emotional than logical?
 
I've often said that without unlimited resources, a federal Constitutional republic fueled by regulated capitalism and having a socialist safety net for the sick, elderly and children is the best the world can hope to have.

OK, but you said socialism wasn't viable, then went on to say countries that have socialist policies are viable, but adopting those same socialist policies here is extremist.

It just doesn't seem like you've really given this much thought.
 
Back
Top