Things we aren't allowed to know

The narrative is White cops shooting black people. THAT is what they NEED. White cops shooting white people or GASP...Black cops shooting white people? oh Hell NO! Weird.....there are over double the amount of white people shot by cops every year....Can anyone name a case that is plastered all over the MSM constantly? Me neither.

Something happens -> police investigates -> police report -> perps and/or victims identified -> the media picks it up.

Which one of those stopped in this case?
 
Something happens -> police investigates -> police report -> perps and/or victims identified -> the media picks it up.

Which one of those stopped in this case?

All of it. Oh...and media blackout. What they are doing isnt working though. it is only serving to wake people up AND ANGER THEM because its so obvious. These people are stupid. ;)
 
Trying to enter a federal building? Why not?

Especially if there is a Federal Judge or some other elected official that is being put in danger by the Antifa mob. In that situation, of course shooting them would be justified, backpack or no backpack. I agree. But they are not entering the Federal Court House, they are more like the people at the capitol who didn't go inside.
 
All of it. Oh...and media blackout. What they are doing isnt working though. it is only serving to wake people up AND ANGER THEM because its so obvious. These people are stupid. ;)

Does that include Fox News and Breitbart?
 
Especially if there is a Federal Judge or some other elected official that is being put in danger by the Antifa mob. In that situation, of course shooting them would be justified, backpack or no backpack. I agree. But they are not entering the Federal Court House, they are more like the people at the capitol who didn't go inside.

Oh yes I know. You just don't break in a federal building like that. And yes those people who were outside were out of the danger zone.
 
In all seriousness.......The white kid being shot in Arizona is the worst case of police MURDER I ever saw. And the cop got off. Not only did he get off,...the COP claimed PTSD and retired young drawing disability. WOW!

This is just beyond anything...

 
So police should shoot ANTIFA on sight when the show up with back packs right?

No. They didn't shoot Babbitt on sight, did they? So why would you think that was my position. Nice strawman. If they are INSIDE the Federal building as part of a mob, and they are threatening Federal Court officials, then yes. Stop putting words in my mouth. I was responding to the affirmative statement that she was unarmed. There was no way of knowing that.
 
BTW.....when do the Babbit riots start? I could use another big screen curved tv! :laugh:
 
In all seriousness.......The white kid being shot in Arizona is the worst case of police MURDER I ever saw. And the cop got off. Not only did he get off,...the COP claimed PTSD and retired young drawing disability. WOW!

This is just beyond anything...


What exactly did the kid do to provoke the cop?
 
Oddly, none of the JPP cop-hating lefties seem to have suggested non-lethal intervention in Ashli's case, have they?

Well, they would have if she was stabbing another woman, then the cops are supposed to let the knife fight ensue and stand by to watch the hilarity. Anything short of doing nothing at all is too much for a cop to do, even if it saves a life.
 
What exactly did the kid do to provoke the cop?

If you watched it....nothing. Just scared,...thats it. Without knowing the background Im going to guess the shooter was an Iraq war veteran that had head problems, maybe dealt with one too many Hadji's in his day. But who knows...Im just guessing.
 
If you watched it....nothing. Just scared,...thats it. Without knowing the background Im going to guess the shooter was an Iraq war veteran that had head problems, maybe dealt with one too many Hadji's in his day. But who knows...Im just guessing.

Yeah. From reading the Youtube comments, apparently they think he sounds mentally deranged. His PTSD could have been triggered.

Another reason to evaluate potential police officers who are vets.
 
Well, they would have if she was stabbing another woman, then the cops are supposed to let the knife fight ensue and stand by to watch the hilarity. Anything short of doing nothing at all is too much for a cop to do, even if it saves a life.

Sarcasm aside, you raise a good point, and one that's missed too often here. Every single one of these cases is unique and fact based. I've watched the knife video a few times, and while I'm not familiar with how cops are trained to deal with that situation, it sure looks to me like that girl was about to stab someone, and I'm pretty sure the knife didn't care how old the person was that was wielding it. And I doubt the victim would be any less injured because she was stabbed by a 13 year old. Then there's the situation in Minnesota in which I fully believe the officer made a negligent and fatal mistake, but did not intend to kill the victim. And then there's Chauvin, who sat there uninterested as he choked the life out of a man. Those three all are different, and should have different outcomes. Sadly though, all the victims are dead.
 
Going THROUGH A BROKEN WINDOW into a hallway with nothing between her and members of Congress except the Capitol police. With a back pack on. Should they have asked nicely? Just admit you were wrong.

Maybe the three Capitol police that just seconds before were moving past her could have intervened. Maybe the several more on the stairs right behind her could have done the same. Maybe the guy that shot her could have just subdued her once through and cuffed her up. Instead, the guy fires a single shot then retreats from the area. Why'd he retreat immediately? Why'd he fire when there was no imminent danger. Why did he fire where it was clearly visible that other Capitol police were on the scene and right next to her?
 
Based on her position, how could he be firing into the crowd? She was through the window. The wall was directly to her left with no one else on that side of the window. It is impossible for the crowd to be in the line of fire based on what we see. Not only that, she was standing on the window which put her about 2' higher than the ground and she was hit in the chest. That would mean his line of fire was an upward trajectory to a target that was already over the head of most people.

If she was "through the window," then why'd she end up on the ground on the side with the protesters?
 
Back
Top