Small size of most U.S. police departments complicates reform

Dutch Uncle said:
And, like the Trumpsters, you dislike anyone who disagrees with you.

I was hoping you would be different but you only lasted one post in response before you proved you were no different than they are.
Click to expand...

Like I care. I always thought you were an asshole troll. Not wasting my time doing what you do best: Chattering about nothing. We are done.
 
BidenPresident said:
Like I care. I always thought you were an asshole troll. Not wasting my time doing what you do best: Chattering about nothing. We are done.
Click to expand...

QED. Like the Trumpsters, all you have are insults, lies and then you ignore those who have different views than your own.

I posted about collecting data and body cams. Your response "Fuck off" and "asshole troll". Why? Because all you want to do spread hate against others and "defund the police". Anyone who has alternative solutions is an "asshole troll" in your opinion.
 
BidenPresident said:
Experts say that while smaller departments have their benefits, including being able to adapt to their communities and hire officers with local ties, these agencies also are typically able to avoid the accountability being sought as part of the national movement to restructure and improve policing. These departments’ often limited resources and the decentralized structure of American law enforcement complicate efforts to mandate widespread training and policy changes, experts say.

“It’s unlike any other country,” Wexler said. “In places like the United Kingdom, you have a Home Office, you have standards. In Germany or Israel … they have a national police. Our policing is completely fragmented, decentralized, with no national standards.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...y-changing-policing-is-difficult-experts-say/
Click to expand...

no shit you were able to figure all that out after staying in a holiday express with dutch for one night
 
Dutch Uncle said:
And, like the Trumpsters, you dislike anyone who disagrees with you.

I was hoping you would be different but you only lasted one post in response before you proved you were no different than they are.
Click to expand...

no you just proved your a arrogant asshole , thats all dutch and we all knew that to start with
 
Dutch Uncle said:
How many people are killed every year by the police? What is the breakdown by gender, race, economics, state, etc?

I've looked for a link to the data and there is no Federal or collective group of states and their PDs compiling the data.

How can we correct problems if we don't know the extent of the problem?
Click to expand...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
looks like dutch the lying fudge packer didst look to far now did he. Took me about 6 min to find the links and post them. tells you how much research the fudge packing arrogant lying asshole dutch did . All he is capable of doing running his blow hole.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/585149/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-gender/


https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/


https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/states


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_killings_by_law_enforcement_officers_in_the_United_States
 
blackascoal said:
That’s not a solution. If not forced, nothing changes.
Click to expand...
The problem with force is backlash. Sure, you can beat people into submission, but they'll always hate you for it.

Better, IMO, is positive reinforcement through good leadership. That requires a collective desire for good leaders. Instead, what we are seeing are people electing whomever they think can force others to do whatever 50.0001% of the people want.

That is not a good model in either the short term or the long term.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
The problem with force is backlash. Sure, you can beat people into submission, but they'll always hate you for it.

Better, IMO, is positive reinforcement through good leadership. That requires a collective desire for good leaders. Instead, what we are seeing are people electing whomever they think can force others to do whatever 50.0001% of the people want.

That is not a good model in either the short term or the long term.
Click to expand...

400 years of waiting on ‘good leadership’ is a bad joke, not a solution.

How about replicating best practices of successful departments? What a novel idea.
 
BidenPresident said:
Experts say that while smaller departments have their benefits, including being able to adapt to their communities and hire officers with local ties, these agencies also are typically able to avoid the accountability being sought as part of the national movement to restructure and improve policing. These departments’ often limited resources and the decentralized structure of American law enforcement complicate efforts to mandate widespread training and policy changes, experts say.

“It’s unlike any other country,” Wexler said. “In places like the United Kingdom, you have a Home Office, you have standards. In Germany or Israel … they have a national police. Our policing is completely fragmented, decentralized, with no national standards.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...y-changing-policing-is-difficult-experts-say/
Click to expand...

Which is not a problem. Each community controls it's own police department...the way it should be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top