Corrupt, partisan NSA caught spying to leak Tucker Carlson messages, to silence him

Arminius said:


This is an "ad hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy (these two things happened at the same time, so one must have CAUSED the other). :nono:

Democrats refused to lift a finger against al Qaida through eight straight years of nonstop terrorist attacks, eventually culminating in 9/11 right after Bush took office, necessitating two wars.

Try again, dishonest demagogue. :bs:



I already posted two links from the NY Times confirming that Democrat attacks on lending standards is what destroyed the housing market, and that it had zero to do with deregulation. :nono:

You're going to have to find a different lie to hide your catastrophic policy blunders behind. :cool:
Click to expand...

The NTY links were wrong. That is not what was responsible. You only link them because they back your phony story.
 
Arminius said:


This is an "ad hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy (these two things happened at the same time, so one must have CAUSED the other). :nono:

Bush having just taken office when Democrats caused 9/11 in no way makes him responsible for THEIR eight-year grovel-appease-surrender foreign policy approach that caused it.

Democrats refused to lift a finger against al Qaida through eight straight years of nonstop terrorist attacks, eventually culminating in 9/11 right after Bush took office, necessitating two wars.

Try again, dishonest demagogue. :bs:



I already posted two links from the NY Times confirming that Democrat attacks on lending standards is what destroyed the housing market, and that it had zero to do with deregulation. :nono:

You're going to have to find a different lie to hide your catastrophic policy blunders behind. :cool:
Click to expand...

oh really, let's see that link, not searching your bs looking for it

so, why did Bush bail out Lehman before leaving office?
 
Arminius actually raises a very good issue for epistemology.

Should we believe something that cannot be verified? Not believing it does not prove it is false--but gives no reason to hold as true.
 
Nordberg said:
The NTY links were wrong. That is not what was responsible. You only link them because they back your phony story.
Click to expand...

You don't just get to say "huh-uh." :laugh:

I've provided YOUR OWN DNC propaganda mills confirming that what's being claimed is a lie. This is the part where you admit you're a brainwashed lemming and a liar or provide OTHER evidence to the contrary, you know, like you would do if you were a thinking adult.

:awesome:
 
BidenPresident said:
Arminius actually raises a very good issue for epistemology.

Should we believe something that cannot be verified? Not believing it does not prove it is false--but gives no reason to hold as true.
Click to expand...

Suddenly we are concerned about anonymous sources being reliable...but not for the last four years while Democrats were caught using them to peddle lie after lie. THIS is why we call you the Demagogue Party.

200w.webp
 
BidenPresident said:
I did not smear a source. I said a right wing blog is not enough to establish truth. I would say the same thing if it was a left wing blog.
Click to expand...

That's trying to disqualify the story based on political orientation, genius, which invites a separate discussion of whose sources are actually constantly caught lying (yours), which is why I provided the list. You'll grasp it eventually. :laugh:
 
Arminius said:


Suddenly we are concerned about anonymous sources being reliable...but not for the last four years while Democrats were caught using them to peddle lie after lie. THIS is why we call you the Demagogue Party.

200w.webp
Click to expand...

I really don't care what your belief about Democrats is.

As I stated, there is no reason to believe something is true or false without evidence.
 
BidenPresident said:
I really don't care what your belief about Democrats is.

As I stated, there is no reason to believe something is true or false without evidence.
Click to expand...

*your belief about what you just demonstrated is true about. :nono:

Yes, we are aware that you only suddenly care about the reliability of anonymous sources now that someone who HASN'T been caught using them to peddle lie after lie is using them.

We get it. You have zero integrity. :nodyes:
 
BidenPresident said:
Descriptive.
Click to expand...

Lovely random word. Is this supposed to mean YES, you were just pointing out that it was right-wing purely for academic attention to detail and in no way at all to suggest that being "right-wing" invalidates it?

Because that wouldn't be obviously phony at all.

:rofl2:
 
Arminius said:


*your belief is what you just demonstrated is true. :nono:

Yes, we are aware that you only suddenly care about the reliability of anonymous sources now that someone who HASN'T been caught using them to peddle lie after lie is using them.

We get it. You have zero integrity. :nodyes:
Click to expand...


insults
 
Arminius said:


Lovely random word. Is this supposed to mean YES, you were just pointing out that it was right-wing purely for academic attention to detail and in no way at all to suggest that being "right-wing" invalidates it?

Because that wouldn't be obviously phony at all.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...


My description was not false.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top