Corrupt, partisan NSA caught spying to leak Tucker Carlson messages, to silence him

Arminius said:


The record shows what happened. I'm done citing it. Repeat your lie all you want.

giphy.gif
Click to expand...

What did I lie about? Oh, you cannot say.
 
Arminius said:


It's the official standard of journalism that you need two sources, and that they can be anonymous. Everything Democrats have been caught lying about for four years straight has been them using this standard to deliberately misinform the public. Every time you cite CNN, NY Times, etc., you are citing anonymous sources, for basically everything they claimed about President Trump the entire time, almost all of which turned out to be intentional lies.
Click to expand...

Perhaps for journalism that might be "official" but we already know that Tucker is not a journalist based on court rulings.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics...e-of-news-defamation-suit-mcdougal-trump.html

It's not "official" that you only need 2 sources in journalism but nice try on your part even if you don't quite get it right. The standard is a minimum of two credible sources. Credibility relies on many factors and that credibility is judged by the editor before the journalist's article is published or broadcast. Then the credibility can also be judged by the public based on the track record of the media source.

CNN and NY Times may or may not be using anonymous sources. It depends on the article. Please show where I cited a single article from CNN or NY Times that only used anonymous sources. Your wild claims about what I do are nothing but sputtering on your part without some actual source to back it up. Surely you must be relying on something factual for your accusation. So present your evidence or be ridiculed for the idiot you are.
 
Arminius said:


No, I used multiple NY Times articles you fucking illiterate moron. What else would you like to falsely invent out of thin air? :laugh:
Click to expand...
When people use the NY Times articles as sources usually the quote from them and post a link. Your response had neither. Am I supposed to invent the NY Times article out of thin air?
 
NSA surveillance program still raises privacy concerns

An extensive surveillance program first revealed by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden in 2013 continues to operate with no judicial and limited congressional oversight despite its potential to capture Americans’ communications, a member of a privacy watchdog agency said in a statement released Tuesday.

The National Security Agency’s XKeyscore program was the subject of a five-year investigation by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), an independent government privacy watchdog, that wrapped up in December.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...134e7a-d685-11eb-a53a-3b5450fdca7a_story.html
 
Arminius said:
Two different whistleblowers within the NSA apparently went to Tucker Carlson with irrefutable proof that the NSA is spying on his private conversations in an attempt to illegally leak anything damaging they can find to destroy his life and silence him.

“Yesterday, we heard from a whistle-blower within the U.S. Government who reached out to warn us that the NSA, The National security agency, is monitoring our electronic communication and is planning to leak them in an attempt to take this show off the air,” he said. “That’s a shocking claim and ordinarily we would be skeptical of it. It’s a crime. Not a third world country, things like that should not happen in America.”

“But unfortunately, they do and in this case, they did,” Tucker continued. “The whistle-blower, who is in a position to know, repeated back to us information about a story that we are working on that could have only come directly from my texts and emails. There’s no other possible source of that information.”

Tucker Carlson 'Confirms' Stunning Claim: Biden Intelligence Agencies Spying to Take Him 'Off the Air'​
Like everything Democrats do these days, this is straight out of the Stalin-Hitler playbook, and is an appalling betrayal of everything the Constitution was drafted to protect us against. We were already crystal clear on the fact that equal protection under the law is utterly non-existent ever since the ACORN president's crime spree of a tenure.

The psychotic persecution of every 1/6 protester within reach after four years straight of releasing Democrat domestic terrorists by the hundreds on a weekly basis nationwide should have removed all doubt about that for anyone who may have been left unconvinced. But this is straight-up KGB level corruption and abuses of power.

But this shocking and monstrous violation of the 4th Amendment is against conservatives, so it will be completely ignored, as always.

View attachment 20248
Click to expand...

You are getting wackier by the day, maybe you ought to take your meds.
 
Arminius said:
Two different whistleblowers within the NSA apparently went to Tucker Carlson with irrefutable proof that the NSA is spying on his private conversations in an attempt to illegally leak anything damaging they can find to destroy his life and silence him.

“Yesterday, we heard from a whistle-blower within the U.S. Government who reached out to warn us that the NSA, The National security agency, is monitoring our electronic communication and is planning to leak them in an attempt to take this show off the air,” he said. “That’s a shocking claim and ordinarily we would be skeptical of it. It’s a crime. Not a third world country, things like that should not happen in America.”

“But unfortunately, they do and in this case, they did,” Tucker continued. “The whistle-blower, who is in a position to know, repeated back to us information about a story that we are working on that could have only come directly from my texts and emails. There’s no other possible source of that information.”

Tucker Carlson 'Confirms' Stunning Claim: Biden Intelligence Agencies Spying to Take Him 'Off the Air'

Like everything Democrats do these days, this is straight out of the Stalin-Hitler playbook, and is an appalling betrayal of everything the Constitution was drafted to protect us against. We were already crystal clear on the fact that equal protection under the law is utterly non-existent ever since the ACORN president's crime spree of a tenure.

The psychotic persecution of every 1/6 protester within reach after four years straight of releasing Democrat domestic terrorists by the hundreds on a weekly basis nationwide should have removed all doubt about that for anyone who may have been left unconvinced. But this is straight-up KGB level corruption and abuses of power.

But this shocking and monstrous violation of the 4th Amendment is against conservatives, so it will be completely ignored, as always.
Click to expand...



 
BidenPresident said:
This has been fun, truly.
But I genuinely have no idea what these lies are you keep attributing to me. I know you have nothing.
Click to expand...

The links I have repeatedly provided to the lie you told that started all of this are only still a baffling mystery because you apparently have an IQ of 40. :nodyes:

200.gif
 
Arminius said:


The links I have repeatedly provided to the lie you told that started all of this are only still a baffling mystery because you apparently have an IQ of 40. :nodyes:

200.gif
Click to expand...


I never read links. Just post something I said that is false which you claim to have refuted. I asked you 23 times and you did not do it.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Perhaps for journalism that might be "official" but we already know that Tucker is not a journalist based on court rulings.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics...e-of-news-defamation-suit-mcdougal-trump.html
Click to expand...

You're using the utterly unhinged and discredited tabloid trash propaganda mill Slate, which was proven to be intentionally lying on all of these hoaxes...to smear the guy who turned out to be right on them all, as the non-journalist? :rofl2:

-the "Trump gassed protesters to give a speech" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax

Facts matter. Good luck with that. :cool:

200w.webp


Poor Richard Saunders said:
It's not "official" that you only need 2 sources in journalism but nice try on your part even if you don't quite get it right.
Click to expand...

"Events with a single eyewitness are reported with attribution. Events with two or more independent eyewitnesses may be reported as fact. Controversial facts are reported with attribution."

Journalism ethics and standards

Do you ever get tired of "correcting" people who turn around and prove you wrong at every turn? :awesome:

Poor Richard Saunders said:
The standard is a minimum of two credible sources. Credibility relies on many factors and that credibility is judged by the editor before the journalist's article is published or broadcast. Then the credibility can also be judged by the public based on the track record of the media source.
Click to expand...

Oh, so you already KNEW the industry standard was two sources before pretending that that wasn't the officially recognized standard. Good to know everything you said in the previous statement was dishonest hair-splitting. :cool:

Poor Richard Saunders said:
CNN and NY Times may or may not be using anonymous sources. It depends on the article. Please show where I cited a single article from CNN or NY Times that only used anonymous sources.
Click to expand...

If you pushed any of these now-debunked hoaxes, you used "anonymous" (made-up) sources that turned out to be deliberately lying. :nodyes:

-the "Trump gassed protesters to give a speech" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax

Poor Richard Saunders said:
Your wild claims about what I do are nothing but sputtering on your part without some actual source to back it up.
Click to expand...

Or the natural result of actually paying attention and remembering the hoaxes you peddle. :dunno:
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
When people use the NY Times articles as sources usually the quote from them and post a link. Your response had neither. Am I supposed to invent the NY Times article out of thin air?
Click to expand...

No, you're supposed to endure the tragic suffering through CTRL-Fing "ny times" and immediately and effortlessly finding the articles to which I refer, lazy whining crybaby. :laugh:
 
BidenPresident said:
An extensive surveillance program first revealed by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden in 2013 continues to operate with no judicial and limited congressional oversight despite its potential to capture Americans’ communications, a member of a privacy watchdog agency said in a statement released Tuesday.

The National Security Agency’s XKeyscore program was the subject of a five-year investigation by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), an independent government privacy watchdog, that wrapped up in December.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...134e7a-d685-11eb-a53a-3b5450fdca7a_story.html
Click to expand...

And? No one is disputing any of this, imbecile. :palm:

Comprehend what is relevant and what is not. :laugh:

giphy.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top