Obama whines about fox news

Status
Not open for further replies.
too funny, you claim it is just me and my wrong intrepetation, even huffington post took his words that way i said....


Obama Hits Fox News: They're "Entirely Devoted To Attacking My Administration" — Fox News Responds (VIDEO)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/16/obama-hits-fox-news-theyr_n_216574.html

ouch, they took it as a direct hit to fox news

FACT....obama never mentioned any other station, solely fox news as proof the media was critical. seriously, you guys are so biased in favor of obama that you can't be objective enough to see the truth of his statements. and now that i have seen the transcripts, there is no ambiguity, he is talking solely about fox news and using that as proof he has been getting critical media.

btw, just google this, the entire net is calling it: obama slams fox
 
oh look, another obamabot who whines about others doing nothing but pissing matches and here he comes with nothing but insults which turn into pissing matches....you're such hypocrite

why don't you explain how i am wrong and why don't you actually prove that fox is "entirely" out to attack his admin....

if all you want to do is ad hom, have it, i'm real convinced i'm wrong by being called a retard by the likes of you that uses that word for everyone you don't agree with it. you overuse it and it has not point, all it signifies is that you have no point, can't debate the issue and since you're too chicken to try, you'll throw out RETARD....once again....

yay, i'm a retard, yay, what a masterful debate IB :rolleyes:

There's no debate here. You're retarded. It's as much of a proven fact as anything else at this point. You have either a seriously retarded reading comprehension problem or you're super dishonest.
 
too funny, you claim it is just me and my wrong intrepetation, even huffington post took his words that way i said....


Obama Hits Fox News: They're "Entirely Devoted To Attacking My Administration" — Fox News Responds (VIDEO)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/16/obama-hits-fox-news-theyr_n_216574.html

ouch, they took it as a direct hit to fox news

FACT....obama never mentioned any other station, solely fox news as proof the media was critical. seriously, you guys are so biased in favor of obama that you can't be objective enough to see the truth of his statements. and now that i have seen the transcripts, there is no ambiguity, he is talking solely about fox news and using that as proof he has been getting critical media.

btw, just google this, the entire net is calling it: obama slams fox

which if logic serves is an admission that all but that one are in the tank for him.
 
There's no debate here. You're retarded. It's as much of a proven fact as anything else at this point. You have either a seriously retarded reading comprehension problem or you're super dishonest.

thanks for proving my point about you....yet again

you can't debate, so you solely ad hom, take your ball and go home, i've provided rational debate, proof as to what he said, shown you how others also see the way i do as opposed to your view....

and you have yet to offer one single debate or idea, you're a hack dude
 
thanks for proving my point about you....yet again

you can't debate, so you solely ad hom, take your ball and go home, i've provided rational debate, proof as to what he said, shown you how others also see the way i do as opposed to your view....

and you have yet to offer one single debate or idea, you're a hack dude

When you present something that is actually debatable, let me know. This issue isn't up for debate. You misread what he said, then you lied about what he said, and every single person on this thread saw it.
 
When you present something that is actually debatable, let me know. This issue isn't up for debate. You misread what he said, then you lied about what he said, and every single person on this thread saw it.

wrong....and a lie from you that "everyone" saw it

seriously, if you're not going to debate, why bother posting anything? it makes you look like a moron...especially since you keep not debating, only ad homs and conjecture and bullshit.

he singled out fox news, thats a fact. care to point out what i got wrong and where i lied? or are we to be treated with more "i can't debate" posts from you....
 
wrong....and a lie from you that "everyone" saw it

seriously, if you're not going to debate, why bother posting anything? it makes you look like a moron...especially since you keep not debating, only ad homs and conjecture and bullshit.

he singled out fox news, thats a fact. care to point out what i got wrong and where i lied? or are we to be treated with more "i can't debate" posts from you....

He's singled out Fox News more than once.
 
wrong....and a lie from you that "everyone" saw it

seriously, if you're not going to debate, why bother posting anything? it makes you look like a moron...especially since you keep not debating, only ad homs and conjecture and bullshit.

he singled out fox news, thats a fact. care to point out what i got wrong and where i lied? or are we to be treated with more "i can't debate" posts from you....

I agree with ib1.... you overreacted and misstated what the president said...

but then, you are a pathetic excuse for an attorney and all you have in your life is stupid stuff like this, while real attorneys are actually meeting with clients and doing worthwhile, lucrative legal work.

It is no wonder you won't share your law firm's website with me...no doubt they would be furious knowing they were paying you to rant on internet message boards.
 
CNN) – Brushing off suggestions Tuesday the media is not critical enough of his administration, President Obama couldn't help but take aim at one cable news channel in particular.

"It's very hard for me to swallow that one," Obama told CNBC when asked whether he thinks the media is too easy on him. "First of all, I've got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my administration."

The interviewer quickly assumed Obama was referring to Fox News, a suggestion the president didn't disagree with.

"Well, that's a pretty big megaphone," he said. "And you'd be hard-pressed, if you watched the entire day, to find a positive story about me on that front."

"We welcome people who are asking us some, you know, tough questions," he continued. "And I think that I've been probably as accessible as any president in the first six months–press conferences, taking questions from reporters, being held accountable, being transparent about what it is that we're trying to do. I think that, actually, the reason that people have been generally positive about what we've tried to do is they feel as if I'm available and willing to answer questions, and we haven't been trying to hide them all. "

lol...quite funny and a total lie.....the people aren't even allowed to see the messiah's birth certificate or college records....
Hes just a common fuckin' liar...but most of us already knew that...


Obama struck a similar tone on the matter last month in his appearance before the White House Correspondents Dinner, during which he joked to the crowd, "Most of you covered me; all of you voted for me, apologies to the Fox table."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/

what a dishonest whiner....i say we send mr. sensitive some cheese
.
 
Classic projection.

"i can't debate yurt"...."i can't prove a mere two simple things requested"....."so i will give my followers ad homs because i know it will impress them without me having to look foolish to them and prove what an idiot i am by trying to back up my claims"

pathetic :rolleyes:
 
I agree with ib1.... you overreacted and misstated what the president said...

but then, you are a pathetic excuse for an attorney and all you have in your life is stupid stuff like this, while real attorneys are actually meeting with clients and doing worthwhile, lucrative legal work.

It is no wonder you won't share your law firm's website with me...no doubt they would be furious knowing they were paying you to rant on internet message boards.

look, another one who doesn't actually debate, but gives an conclusory opinoin and ad homs....do you and IB stroke each often? or just on weds?
 
I agree with ib1.... you overreacted and misstated what the president said...

but then, you are a pathetic excuse for an attorney and all you have in your life is stupid stuff like this, while real attorneys are actually meeting with clients and doing worthwhile, lucrative legal work.

It is no wonder you won't share your law firm's website with me...no doubt they would be furious knowing they were paying you to rant on internet message boards.

at first i ignored this, but upon second look, you are threatening exactly that which you accuse SM and myself and others of doing, taking something from the internet into the real world. you and solitary or crimson tide go off on SM, even damocles goes off on him in YOUR defense because he has threatened to or has contacted your employer. but what do you do.....the exact same thing.

you reap what you sow
 
anyways, sans the obsessive creep MM....

please post up where i lied or what i am wrong about. you guys know that when i have been shown the error of my ways, i immediately admit my error or mistake. i've done it repeatedly. so let's see it, can you guys actually do something other than insults?
 
Here you go Yurt:

""what he said is, fox is the ONLY critical media"

That's a lie. He didn't say that, or even imply it.

Now, I'm sure you will "immediately" admit your error.
 
anyways, sans the obsessive creep MM....

please post up where i lied or what i am wrong about. you guys know that when i have been shown the error of my ways, i immediately admit my error or mistake. i've done it repeatedly. so let's see it, can you guys actually do something other than insults?

June 17, 2009
Obama takes aim at Fox News
Posted: 12:34 PM ET

From CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney
art.obamafox.gi.jpg
Obama says Fox News is 'entirely devoted' to attacking his administration.

corner_wire_BL.gif


(CNN) – Brushing off suggestions Tuesday the media is not critical enough of his administration, President Obama couldn't help but take aim at one cable news channel in particular.


"It's very hard for me to swallow that one," Obama told CNBC when asked whether he thinks the media is too easy on him. "First of all, I've got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my administration."


The interviewer quickly assumed Obama was referring to Fox News, a suggestion the president didn't disagree with.
"Well, that's a pretty big megaphone," he said. "And you'd be hard-pressed, if you watched the entire day, to find a positive story about me on that front."


"We welcome people who are asking us some, you know, tough questions," he continued. "And I think that I've been probably as accessible as any president in the first six months–press conferences, taking questions from reporters, being held accountable, being transparent about what it is that we're trying to do. I think that, actually, the reason that people have been generally positive about what we've tried to do is they feel as if I'm available and willing to answer questions, and we haven't been trying to hide them all. "
Obama struck a similar tone on the matter last month in his appearance before the White House Correspondents Dinner, during which he joked to the crowd, "Most of you covered me; all of you voted for me, apologies to the Fox table."
 
Here you go Yurt:

""what he said is, fox is the ONLY critical media"

That's a lie. He didn't say that, or even imply it.

Now, I'm sure you will "immediately" admit your error.

thanks onceler....

do you know what an ommision is? have you ever heard of a statement of ommission....in that, your failure to state something can be considered an actual statement?

further, did obama mention any other news media, or did he only mention fox?

edit: when my post is read in context, you failed to provide any....it is clear i am talking about ommission
 
I agree with ib1.... you overreacted and misstated what the president said...

but then, you are a pathetic excuse for an attorney and all you have in your life is stupid stuff like this, while real attorneys are actually meeting with clients and doing worthwhile, lucrative legal work.

It is no wonder you won't share your law firm's website with me...no doubt they would be furious knowing they were paying you to rant on internet message boards.
Revenge can only escalate this, MM. I thought you were going to stop answering the dude.

One of you, please. Just end it by stopping. There is nothing good that can come of this.
 
at first i ignored this, but upon second look, you are threatening exactly that which you accuse SM and myself and others of doing, taking something from the internet into the real world. you and solitary or crimson tide go off on SM, even damocles goes off on him in YOUR defense because he has threatened to or has contacted your employer. but what do you do.....the exact same thing.

you reap what you sow

I only suggested that I can understand why you would be hesitant to share your employment information with anyone... I am not so sure that, if I were you, and I were, as you have implied, an attorney with a law firm with ANY prestige, I would not want my "partners" knowing what I said on the internet while they were busy working for the good of the firm.

But hey.... you can frame it any way you want, counselor... we both know that your "partners" will never know about it because you will do whatever is necessary to keep them from knowing.

how upstanding of you.:pke:
 
Revenge can only escalate this, MM. I thought you were going to stop answering the dude.

One of you, please. Just end it by stopping. There is nothing good that can come of this.


I am not the one who has searched out and found the other's workplace website and email address.

He wants to play tough with me, let him...and then we'll see what "good" can come of this and who gets to define what "good" eventually is.

He's a little worm...a disgusting excuse for an attorney who spends all his day posting on internet chat sites instead of earning his keep... he makes promises of confidentiality and then, immediately, begins to threaten people with disclosure of those confidential discussions.

No wonder he will not disclose HIS real identity and his law firm name...if he did, he'd be at risk of being fired, or disbarred.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top