How many JPP patriots have ingested iodine antiseptic?

Dutch Uncle said:
Much more humane than what fucking Stalin or Mao did. Certainly better than fascist Germany, Italy and Japan.
Click to expand...

You don't happen to be talking about .270 cranial copper jacketed lead head injections for traitors, do you?

Ga 'head and hit your Feeb speed dial now, cunt fuck.

That won't change Biden fucking up your life ary a bit, dumbass.

We're going to allow that so you feel it. Better than a merciful painless death for you.

Deal with the policies and politicians you "support".
 
Last edited:
Matt Dillon said:
You don't happen to be talking about .270 cranial copper jacketed lead head injections for traitors, do you?

Ga 'head and hit your Feeb speed dial now, cunt fuck.

That won't change Biden fucking up your life ary a bit, dumbass.

We're going to allow that so you feel it. Better than a merciful painless death for you.

Deal with the policies and politicians you "support".
Click to expand...

All the sane people know traitors are hanged, soldiers are shot.

Thanks for proving you're a domestic terrorist, Matt. Certainly not a Christian. Sad, but you choose your own path.
 
dukkha said:
eyes are an entrance point. one reason I object to mask for kids is it makes kids touch their face
and masks other then tight fitting multi-layer dont work
Click to expand...

Are you saying nothing is better than masks in school? I'm good with separating the kids of dumbasses from those of sane Americans. Let them kill each other of and push our nation away from Idiocracy.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
All the sane people know traitors are hanged, soldiers are shot.

Thanks for proving you're a domestic terrorist, Matt. Certainly not a Christian. Sad, but you choose your own path.
Click to expand...

Fuck off Snitchy McSnitcherton. I'll turn that shit around on all parties involved..

Who the fuck are you to be judging my Christianity?

You chose evil oppressors, you retarded douche.

I may be free of the consequences of your actions while you will still suffer from them.

Most people generally are.

Faggot POS.
 
christiefan915 said:
The article is from 2011 and doesn't address Ivermectin and Covid.

The Reuters article doesn't mention ivermectin. PF-07321332 is not an ivermectin clone.
Click to expand...

Try to dismiss this so easily!

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

Abstract
Background:
After COVID-19 emerged on U.S shores, providers began reviewing the emerging basic science, translational, and clinical data to identify potentially effective treatment options. In addition, a multitude of both novel and repurposed therapeutic agents were used empirically and studied within clinical trials.

Areas of Uncertainty:
The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits. Given some have not passed peer review, several expert groups including Unitaid/World Health Organization have undertaken a systematic global effort to contact all active trial investigators to rapidly gather the data needed to grade and perform meta-analyses.

Data Sources:
Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts posted to preprint servers, expert meta-analyses, and numerous epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution campaigns.

Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.

Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

https://journals.lww.com/americanthe...ing_the.4.aspx
 
christiefan915 said:
The article is from 2011 and doesn't address Ivermectin and Covid.

The Reuters article doesn't mention ivermectin. PF-07321332 is not an ivermectin clone.
Click to expand...

Try to dismiss this so easily!

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19


Abstract
Background:
After COVID-19 emerged on U.S shores, providers began reviewing the emerging basic science, translational, and clinical data to identify potentially effective treatment options. In addition, a multitude of both novel and repurposed therapeutic agents were used empirically and studied within clinical trials.

Areas of Uncertainty:
The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits. Given some have not passed peer review, several expert groups including Unitaid/World Health Organization have undertaken a systematic global effort to contact all active trial investigators to rapidly gather the data needed to grade and perform meta-analyses.

Data Sources:
Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts posted to preprint servers, expert meta-analyses, and numerous epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution campaigns.

Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.

Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

https://journals.lww.com/americanth...he_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx
 
Primavera said:
Try to dismiss this so easily!

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

<snip>
Click to expand...

And you will probably dismiss this. If any of these researchers are pro-ivermectin, their input is biased. (Btw, can you find anything on Fauci saying he approves of oral ivermectin, because I've been looking all around the internet with no success.)

"A peer-reviewed meta-analysis of 15 trials, published in the July/August issue of the American Journal of Therapeutics, found that "large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin." But experts told PolitiFact, an independent fact-checking outlet, that some of the trials the study included were not high-quality, and some of its authors were affiliated with a pro-ivermectin group.

Absent more randomized, controlled clinical trials, scientists remain skeptical about the benefits of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.

"To extrapolate from how much drug is needed to work in the test tube to how much is required to work in a human being against the virus makes these trials and all the meta-reviews published less than worthless – it’s dangerous," Dr. Benhur Lee, a microbiology professor at Mount Sinai's Icahn School of Medicine, said in an email."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/08/13/fact-check-ivermectin-not-proven-covid-19-treatment/5566216001/
 
christiefan915 said:
And you will probably dismiss this. If any of these researchers are pro-ivermectin, their input is biased. (Btw, can you find anything on Fauci saying he approves of oral ivermectin, because I've been looking all around the internet with no success.)
[FONT=&]
"A peer-reviewed meta-analysis of 15 trials, published in the July/August issue of the American Journal of Therapeutics, found that "large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin." But experts told PolitiFact, an independent fact-checking outlet, that some of the trials the study included were not high-quality, and some of its authors were affiliated with a pro-ivermectin group.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Absent more randomized, controlled clinical trials, scientists remain skeptical about the benefits of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&]"To extrapolate from how much drug is needed to work in the test tube to how much is required to work in a human being against the virus makes these trials and all the meta-reviews published less than worthless – it’s dangerous," Dr. Benhur Lee, a microbiology professor at Mount Sinai's Icahn School of Medicine, said in an email."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/08/13/fact-check-ivermectin-not-proven-covid-19-treatment/5566216001/[/FONT]
Click to expand...

Oh you. *Everyone* knows that facts and fact checkers are all liberal. :rolleyes:
 
christiefan915 said:
And you will probably dismiss this. If any of these researchers are pro-ivermectin, their input is biased. (Btw, can you find anything on Fauci saying he approves of oral ivermectin, because I've been looking all around the internet with no success.)

"A peer-reviewed meta-analysis of 15 trials, published in the July/August issue of the American Journal of Therapeutics, found that "large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin." But experts told PolitiFact, an independent fact-checking outlet, that some of the trials the study included were not high-quality, and some of its authors were affiliated with a pro-ivermectin group.

Absent more randomized, controlled clinical trials, scientists remain skeptical about the benefits of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.

"To extrapolate from how much drug is needed to work in the test tube to how much is required to work in a human being against the virus makes these trials and all the meta-reviews published less than worthless – it’s dangerous," Dr. Benhur Lee, a microbiology professor at Mount Sinai's Icahn School of Medicine, said in an email."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/08/13/fact-check-ivermectin-not-proven-covid-19-treatment/5566216001/
Click to expand...

I will say this though, ivermectin is made by Merck in the US who are now touting a new, ie very expensive, drug molnupiravir. Look what happened with Astra Zeneca, even now it's not licenced in the US despite having a total of 3.5 billion units either used or on order. Aren't you in the least bit curious as to why Uttar Pradesh banished the Delta variant almost overnight despite low vaxx rollout?
 
Primavera said:
I will say this though, ivermectin is made by Merck in the US who are now touting a new, ie very expensive, drug molnupiravir. Look what happened with Astra Zeneca, even now it's not licenced in the US despite having a total of 3.5 billion units either used or on order. Aren't you in the least bit curious as to why Uttar Pradesh banished the Delta variant almost overnight despite low vaxx rollout?
Click to expand...

Astra Zeneca isn't fit for dogs
 
Primavera said:
I will say this though, ivermectin is made by Merck in the US who are now touting a new, ie very expensive, drug molnupiravir. Look what happened with Astra Zeneca, even now it's not licenced in the US despite having a total of 3.5 billion units either used or on order. Aren't you in the least bit curious as to why Uttar Pradesh banished the Delta variant almost overnight despite low vaxx rollout?
Click to expand...

India’s Uttar Pradesh State Now COVID-Free, Recovery Rate Up 98.6% Because Of Ivermectin
BY OLIVIA CAVALLARO SEP 17, 2021 04:16 AM EDT

India's Uttar Pradesh State has declared victory against COVID after it reported a recovery rate of 98.6%. The government announced a steady improvement of the COVID situation in the area with about 67 districts reporting no new cases of the viral infection in the last 24 hours.

According to Hindustan Times, India's Uttar Pradesh State has a total of 199 active cases, with a positivity rate going as low as 0.01%. In the last 24 hours, the state reported only 11 new COVID cases and no deaths. India Today credits the success to the stringent "trace, test and treat" measure, vaccination and partial curfews that helped bring down COVID case numbers in the recent weeks.
Uttar Pradesh is also one of five states in India with the lowest cases of COVID despite having a low vaccination rate of just 5.8% of its population. The state currently has 15,236,150 fully vaccinated individuals.

"Uttar Pradesh was the first state in the country to introduce large-scale prophylactic and therapeutic use of Ivermectin," Surveillance Officer Vikssendu Agrawal said, as reported by the Indian Express. Dr. Anshul Pareek led a team in May to June 2020 to administer Ivermectin to patients on an experimental basis. Agrawal said, "It was observed that none of them developed Covid-19 despite being in daily contact with patients who had tested positive for the virus."

Agrawal added that Ivermectin has helped the state maintain low positivity rates despite its high population density. He added, "Once the second wave subsides, we would conduct our own study as there has been an emerging body of evidence to substantiate our timely use of Ivermectin from the first wave itself."

India continues to see a benefit from Ivermectin, which the mainstream media continues to vilify. However, Juan Chamie, the Cambridge-based data analyst who has provided graphical insight and published on COVID, told The Desert Review that "Despite a widespread attempt by the media and WHO to convince the world that India has dropped Ivermectin by citing the [Directorate General of Health Services] DGHS, the [Indian Council of Medical Research] ICMR and [All India Institute Of Medical Science] AIIMS have not changed their position, and Ivermectin remains in the India National Protocol."

Following the deadly wave of COVID in April and May in India, cases have seen a major decline all over the country. However, the western state of Maharashtra and the southern state of Kerala have seen yet another spike, DW reported. On Wednesday, Maharashtra reported over 3,700 new cases and over 50 deaths, while Kerala recorded over 4.4 million cases with more than 23,000 deaths.

Health experts are now warning of a potential third wave in October especially as the festival season is fast approaching. Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that efforts were being undertaken to ensure hospital bed capacity and oxygen availability in the event of another deadly wave.

https://www.christianitydaily.com/a...covery-rate-up-98-6-because-of-ivermectin.htm
 
.

Why bother when you in-house experts like Madwitch, Nutberg and Polibullshitter?


Oxford is trialling Ivermectin - the path to this point has been rocky, why?

Doherty Media August 19, 2021

By Associate Professor Justin Denholm, Principal Investigator on ASCOT

The PRINCIPLE trial recently announced that their ongoing platform will now add ivermectin to the list of drugs being evaluated. PRINCIPLE’s focus is on treatment for people in the UK community who have recently developed symptoms of COVID-19, and will give three days of ivermectin to look at whether fewer are admitted to hospital than compared with standard of care. REMAP-CAP has also just announced they will be testing ivermectin for critically ill patients.

While PRINCIPLE will likely be the largest study to consider ivermectin (there are more than 5,000 patients enrolled in the trial so far), whatever the results it may not definitively satisfy everyone. Some of the reasons for this are related to the design of the study, which is pragmatic and will enrol people who have symptoms consistent with COVID-19, even without a test to confirm the diagnosis, and is not placebo-controlled.

However, ivermectin has also had a complicated political pathway after initially being found to inhibit SARS-Co-V 2 in the lab in high doses. Ivermectin is commonly used as an anti-parasite drug around the world, and is known to be cheap, safe and widely available. It was enthusiastically adopted by some clinicians and healthcare systems before any significant human trials were conducted, and subsequent trials have been largely small and conflicted. Now, a number of retrospective reviews and meta-analyses have been released, which mostly agree that studies to date have generally been of low quality and high risk of bias, but offering different conclusions about whether ivermectin improves outcomes. As stated by the REMAP-CAP investigators: “Therefore, ivermectin needs to be tested in a larger (not single-centred) high-quality randomised trial.”

Unfortunately, in recent weeks, the ivermectin story has been further marred by at least one of the largest studies to date suggesting benefit being withdrawn due to apparent fraud, with independent reviewers finding that the study was likely fabricated entirely. While research misconduct like this doesn’t provide evidence one way or the other about the usefulness of ivermectin, it certainly sours enthusiasm for further research.

Perhaps the biggest problem in this story has been the aggressive promotion of ivermectin as an effective treatment without appropriate clinical trial evidence. In Australia, Federal MP Craig Kelly has been criticised for repeatedly making erroneous statements about the effectiveness of ivermectin. This has created an environment where generating good data about ivermectin has been more difficult than needed, with some arguing that ivermectin should already be given as part of routine care while others state that it’s proven not to work and so shouldn’t be considered further, even in research. Although a few large and well-conducted clinical trials early in the pandemic could have provided much better information about ivermectin, the highly political and rapidly changing conditions have contributed to making funding, recruitment and implementation of such trials difficult.

The ASCOT team is very aware of the challenges of developing and conducting randomised trials in pandemic conditions, but we’re committed to it because clinical trials are the best way to offer patients new therapies and generate the evidence needed to use them ethically. Hopefully the PRINCIPLE trial will provide some clear data on the real-world impact of ivermectin for this patient group, as we continue to need a range of new and well-studied treatments for better control of the COVID-19 pandemic.

https://www.ascot-trial.edu.au/blog...tin-the-path-to-this-point-has-been-rocky-why
 
Primavera said:
India’s Uttar Pradesh State Now COVID-Free, Recovery Rate Up 98.6% Because Of Ivermectin
BY OLIVIA CAVALLARO SEP 17, 2021 04:16 AM EDT

India's Uttar Pradesh State has declared victory against COVID after it reported a recovery rate of 98.6%. The government announced a steady improvement of the COVID situation in the area with about 67 districts reporting no new cases of the viral infection in the last 24 hours.
Click to expand...
if we had used hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as prescribing doses (protocol) by front line doctors
we could have gotten rid of delta like India

TO THIS DAY all the CDC and public health talk is about vaxxing - prophylaxis are ignored
 
Primavera said:
India’s Uttar Pradesh State Now COVID-Free, Recovery Rate Up 98.6% Because Of Ivermectin
BY OLIVIA CAVALLARO SEP 17, 2021 04:16 AM EDT

India's Uttar Pradesh State has declared victory against COVID after it reported a recovery rate of 98.6%. The government announced a steady improvement of the COVID situation in the area with about 67 districts reporting no new cases of the viral infection in the last 24 hours.

According to Hindustan Times, India's Uttar Pradesh State has a total of 199 active cases, with a positivity rate going as low as 0.01%. In the last 24 hours, the state reported only 11 new COVID cases and no deaths. India Today credits the success to the stringent "trace, test and treat" measure, vaccination and partial curfews that helped bring down COVID case numbers in the recent weeks.
Uttar Pradesh is also one of five states in India with the lowest cases of COVID despite having a low vaccination rate of just 5.8% of its population. The state currently has 15,236,150 fully vaccinated individuals.

"Uttar Pradesh was the first state in the country to introduce large-scale prophylactic and therapeutic use of Ivermectin," Surveillance Officer Vikssendu Agrawal said, as reported by the Indian Express. Dr. Anshul Pareek led a team in May to June 2020 to administer Ivermectin to patients on an experimental basis. Agrawal said, "It was observed that none of them developed Covid-19 despite being in daily contact with patients who had tested positive for the virus."

Agrawal added that Ivermectin has helped the state maintain low positivity rates despite its high population density. He added, "Once the second wave subsides, we would conduct our own study as there has been an emerging body of evidence to substantiate our timely use of Ivermectin from the first wave itself."

India continues to see a benefit from Ivermectin, which the mainstream media continues to vilify. However, Juan Chamie, the Cambridge-based data analyst who has provided graphical insight and published on COVID, told The Desert Review that "Despite a widespread attempt by the media and WHO to convince the world that India has dropped Ivermectin by citing the [Directorate General of Health Services] DGHS, the [Indian Council of Medical Research] ICMR and [All India Institute Of Medical Science] AIIMS have not changed their position, and Ivermectin remains in the India National Protocol."

Following the deadly wave of COVID in April and May in India, cases have seen a major decline all over the country. However, the western state of Maharashtra and the southern state of Kerala have seen yet another spike, DW reported. On Wednesday, Maharashtra reported over 3,700 new cases and over 50 deaths, while Kerala recorded over 4.4 million cases with more than 23,000 deaths.

Health experts are now warning of a potential third wave in October especially as the festival season is fast approaching. Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that efforts were being undertaken to ensure hospital bed capacity and oxygen availability in the event of another deadly wave.

https://www.christianitydaily.com/a...covery-rate-up-98-6-because-of-ivermectin.htm
Click to expand...

How do they know the people taking it wouldn't have recovered anyway? This is all anecdotal, it needs rigorous controlled testing. Also,

Only 34 districts have been declared COVID-19 free so far. Several health bodies have warned against using Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

"Active cases in Uttar Pradesh have declined, but the state is not entirely free of COVID-19. Furthermore, it is incorrect to infer that Ivermectin use played a role in reducing the number of COVID-19 cases in the state, as its use has not been fully approved by public health bodies."

https://www.logically.ai/factchecks/library/0347bd71
 
christiefan915 said:
How do they know the people taking it wouldn't have recovered anyway? This is all anecdotal, it needs rigorous controlled testing. Also,

Only 34 districts have been declared COVID-19 free so far. Several health bodies have warned against using Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

"Active cases in Uttar Pradesh have declined, but the state is not entirely free of COVID-19. Furthermore, it is incorrect to infer that Ivermectin use played a role in reducing the number of COVID-19 cases in the state, as its use has not been fully approved by public health bodies."

https://www.logically.ai/factchecks/library/0347bd71
Click to expand...

We can all cherry pick.

On September 15, 2021, the Uttar Pradesh government announced that 60 districts reported no new COVID-19 cases in the last 24 hours. They also said that due to extensive sample testing and a successful vaccination drive, 34 districts had no current cases. According to the state's health department, more than 2.17 lakh samples were tested for COVID-19 out of which 14 new cases were found in 10 districts.

As of September 21, there were 194 active cases in Uttar Pradesh, with a recovery rate of 98.7 percent.

The Indian Express reported the state officials credited the "prophylactic and therapeutic" use of Ivermectin in helping to lower the rate of cases across the state. State Surveillance Officer Vikasendu Agrawal said that Ivermectin was administered to all the members of the Rapid Response Team from Agra, and that none of them developed COVID-19.

The state's health department acknowledged that they would conduct a controlled study to assess the effectiveness of using Ivermectin to reduce the rate of infections and fatality. "Once the second wave subsides, we would conduct our own study as there has been an emerging body of evidence to substantiate our timely use of Ivermectin from the first wave itself," Vikasendu affirmed.

In August 2020, the Uttar Pradesh government gave the go-ahead to include Ivermectin as prophylaxis for close contacts of COVID-19 patients, health care workers, and the treatment of the patients.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
LV426 said:
Instead of just getting vaccinated, anti-vaxxers are drinking iodine antiseptic
First there was hydroxychloroquine, then ivermectin; now, according to multiple reports, some Americans are gargling and/or ingesting the iodine-based liquid Betadine to prevent COVID-19 — instead of getting vaccinated.
Betadine is the brand name for povidone-iodine, an amber-colored liquid typically sold as a 10% solution as an antiseptic for cleaning wounds and skin. A 0.5% solution is sold as a gargle for sore throats, but the manufacturer cautions people not to swallow it. Recently, the manufacturer warned consumers not to consume Betadine to treat COVID-19, or rely on it as a form of treatment.
https://www.rawstory.com/anti-vaxxers-iodine/

I bet at least one JPP Conservative has done this.
Click to expand...

I'll bet you ingest gonads every night you cock swallowing bitch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top