Dearest Dixie

LadyT

LadyT

JPP Modarater
Contributor
I noticed that you're so busy hijacking my thread about how racist you conservatives and turn into a whine fest about abortions, you,for almost a week now, have inadvertently missed my question:


Do you also think its "valid" that people kill homosexuals or nonbelievers because these views are based on their religion? Or do you just arbitrarily pick racist interpretations to support by claiming they are valid?

I'm just curious.
 
No answer? Finally realized how ridiculous that statement was? Did you have an epiphany and realize how racist it is oppose interracial marriage, no matter what you hide behind?

Too embarrassed to acknowledge you've been pwned? I understand. I won't make a scene. We all make mistakes.

And by we, I mean you conservatives.
 
LadyT said:
I noticed that you're so busy hijacking my thread about how racist you conservatives and turn into a whine fest about abortions, you,for almost a week now, have inadvertently missed my question:


Do you also think its "valid" that people kill homosexuals or nonbelievers because these views are based on their religion? Or do you just arbitrarily pick racist interpretations to support by claiming they are valid?

I'm just curious.
Click to expand...

First of all, I have not supported ANY viewpoint. I only maintained that a religious viewpoint (which I do not personally hold) regarding interracial marriage is not racist, and you've not demonstrated how it is. No, you've just gone on to insist this is not debatable and you are right and I am wrong, end of discussion. You have to show me where the religious viewpoint is rooted in sentiments of racial superiority, inferiority, or discrimination by race in any way. If you can't show me that, you haven't proven it is a "racist" viewpoint. You may disagree with the viewpoint, as do I, but claiming it is something it is not, is invalid.

As for your other absurd part to the ridiculous question, I don't believe a moral argument can be made for murdering people, regardless of why it is being done. If such a thing were happening in the name of religious beliefs, I would denounce it, as I have done with the Taliban and radical Islamic fundamentalists.

Hope that answers you idiotic question and you can now move on with your pathetic life.
 
Once dixie has said something, he's not admitting he's wrong under any circumstances. I don't see why we're wasting our time.

If he disagreed with Newton's theory of gravity, and tried to jump off a cliff to prove his point, he still wouldn't believe it when he was an inch from the ground.
 
Once dixie has said something, he's not admitting he's wrong under any circumstances. I don't see why we're wasting our time.

If he disagreed with Newton's theory of gravity, and tried to jump off a cliff to prove his point, he still wouldn't believe it when he was an inch from the ground.
 
Dixie said:
First of all, I have not supported ANY viewpoint. I only maintained that a religious viewpoint (which I do not personally hold) regarding interracial marriage is not racist, and you've not demonstrated how it is. No, you've just gone on to insist this is not debatable and you are right and I am wrong, end of discussion. You have to show me where the religious viewpoint is rooted in sentiments of racial superiority, inferiority, or discrimination by race in any way. If you can't show me that, you haven't proven it is a "racist" viewpoint. You may disagree with the viewpoint, as do I, but claiming it is something it is not, is invalid.
Click to expand...

#1) you still have failed to mention where specifically in the bible it mentions race. How a bunch of inbred southern rednecks came to the conclusion it meant that people shouldn't "mix" races (i.e. DISCRIMINATE AGAINST WHO THEY SHOULD PROCREATE WITH) is still a mystery to me. How you think that this conclusion is some how "valid" ( your words not mine) show's you support. I'm just curious how you feel so comfortable with this view point. I'm not shocked considering the fact that you think what Kilmeade said was acceptable.

As for your other absurd part to the ridiculous question, I don't believe a moral argument can be made for murdering people, regardless of why it is being done. If such a thing were happening in the name of religious beliefs, I would denounce it, as I have done with the Taliban and radical Islamic fundamentalists.

Hope that answers you idiotic question and you can now move on with your pathetic life.
Click to expand...

Ok. I just wanted to make sure that I understood that what you're in fact saying is that you think segregationist interpretations are valid and that you just arbitrarily brush aside the other religious interpretations in favor of logic and reason. That's all. I just wanted to make sure I understood your inconsistencies. I can get on with my life. Thanks for clarifying.
 
Watermark said:
Once dixie has said something, he's not admitting he's wrong under any circumstances. I don't see why we're wasting our time.

If he disagreed with Newton's theory of gravity, and tried to jump off a cliff to prove his point, he still wouldn't believe it when he was an inch from the ground.
Click to expand...

1/3
 
Dixie said:
First of all, I have not supported ANY viewpoint. I only maintained that a religious viewpoint (which I do not personally hold) regarding interracial marriage is not racist, and you've not demonstrated how it is. No, you've just gone on to insist this is not debatable and you are right and I am wrong, end of discussion. You have to show me where the religious viewpoint is rooted in sentiments of racial superiority, inferiority, or discrimination by race in any way. If you can't show me that, you haven't proven it is a "racist" viewpoint. You may disagree with the viewpoint, as do I, but claiming it is something it is not, is invalid.

As for your other absurd part to the ridiculous question, I don't believe a moral argument can be made for murdering people, regardless of why it is being done. If such a thing were happening in the name of religious beliefs, I would denounce it, as I have done with the Taliban and radical Islamic fundamentalists.

Hope that answers you idiotic question and you can now move on with your pathetic life.
Click to expand...


Dixie, I've come to the conclusion that if you're not a closet racist, you are a racist enabler. Which is just as fucking bad. I don't have a single doubt anymore that your adult life has been willingly surrounded by the racist mythology and the arguments and logic of neoconfederates.

if you think its merely a matter of "disagreement" that some pretzel logic interpretation of the bible is racist or not, then piss off.

I'm glad I brought up your interracial pretzel bible logic. I'd rather see the racist enablers out in the open, than hiding in the shadows. Cheers!
 
I just love posts from the morons....so entertaining....

Go Lady T.....give us another one....
 
LadyT said:
#1) you still have failed to mention where specifically in the bible it mentions race. How a bunch of inbred southern rednecks came to the conclusion it meant that people shouldn't "mix" races (i.e. DISCRIMINATE AGAINST WHO THEY SHOULD PROCREATE WITH) is still a mystery to me. How you think that this conclusion is some how "valid" ( your words not mine) show's you support. I'm just curious how you feel so comfortable with this view point. I'm not shocked considering the fact that you think what Kilmeade said was acceptable.
Click to expand...

No, I am sorry, I didn't fail to mention it at all. It's back on about page 3 of the Kilmeade thread. The interpretation comes from Genesis 11, when man tried to build a tower to heaven. God destroyed the tower and cast mankind to the four corners of the Earth and gave him different tongues (languages) so that he may never again try to do something so bold as to build a tower to heaven. Fundamental believers in the Old Testament, feel this was a mandate from God, that mankind should never mix race, because that would eventually result in "undoing" what God had done. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with racial superiority, inferiority, or equality in any way. Indeed, there ARE people who are racist, who don't believe in mixing race because they believe their chosen race should remain pure, that is an entirely different belief, and one that IS racist.

I never validated the religious viewpoint, I never supported the religious viewpoint, I never advocated for the religious viewpoint, and I haven't endorsed the religious viewpoint. Although you continue to try and argue that I have! My PERSONAL viewpoint has nothing to do with whether something is "racist" or not!

Ok. I just wanted to make sure that I understood that what you're in fact saying is that you think segregationist interpretations are valid and that you just arbitrarily brush aside the other religious interpretations in favor of logic and reason. That's all. I just wanted to make sure I understood your inconsistencies. I can get on with my life. Thanks for clarifying.
Click to expand...

I have not said one single word about "segregationist" viewpoints. Again, you attempt to tie me to things I haven't said or implied. That is because you are bigoted. I hope that others can see your bigotry, because that is one of the fundamental problems with our society in dealing with race relations. Until we can expose the bigots and the bigotry and stop calling things "racist" that don't fit the criteria, we are going to have problems.
 
Dixie said:
No, I am sorry, I didn't fail to mention it at all. It's back on about page 3 of the Kilmeade thread. The interpretation comes from Genesis 11, when man tried to build a tower to heaven. God destroyed the tower and cast mankind to the four corners of the Earth and gave him different tongues (languages) so that he may never again try to do something so bold as to build a tower to heaven. Fundamental believers in the Old Testament, feel this was a mandate from God, that mankind should never mix race, because that would eventually result in "undoing" what God had done. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with racial superiority, inferiority, or equality in any way. Indeed, there ARE people who are racist, who don't believe in mixing race because they believe their chosen race should remain pure, that is an entirely different belief, and one that IS racist.

I never validated the religious viewpoint, I never supported the religious viewpoint, I never advocated for the religious viewpoint, and I haven't endorsed the religious viewpoint. Although you continue to try and argue that I have! My PERSONAL viewpoint has nothing to do with whether something is "racist" or not!



I have not said one single word about "segregationist" viewpoints. Again, you attempt to tie me to things I haven't said or implied. That is because you are bigoted. I hope that others can see your bigotry, because that is one of the fundamental problems with our society in dealing with race relations. Until we can expose the bigots and the bigotry and stop calling things "racist" that don't fit the criteria, we are going to have problems.
Click to expand...

You're missing one important step. Why do you think its valid to make the leap from "tongues" to races? What if different races speak the same language?
 
Dixie said:
No, I am sorry, I didn't fail to mention it at all. It's back on about page 3 of the Kilmeade thread. The interpretation comes from Genesis 11, when man tried to build a tower to heaven. God destroyed the tower and cast mankind to the four corners of the Earth and gave him different tongues (languages) so that he may never again try to do something so bold as to build a tower to heaven. Fundamental believers in the Old Testament, feel this was a mandate from God, that mankind should never mix race, because that would eventually result in "undoing" what God had done. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with racial superiority, inferiority, or equality in any way. Indeed, there ARE people who are racist, who don't believe in mixing race because they believe their chosen race should remain pure, that is an entirely different belief, and one that IS racist.

I never validated the religious viewpoint, I never supported the religious viewpoint, I never advocated for the religious viewpoint, and I haven't endorsed the religious viewpoint. Although you continue to try and argue that I have! My PERSONAL viewpoint has nothing to do with whether something is "racist" or not!



I have not said one single word about "segregationist" viewpoints. Again, you attempt to tie me to things I haven't said or implied. That is because you are bigoted. I hope that others can see your bigotry, because that is one of the fundamental problems with our society in dealing with race relations. Until we can expose the bigots and the bigotry and stop calling things "racist" that don't fit the criteria, we are going to have problems.
Click to expand...


I didn't see anything about race or skin color in there. Why did you and your fellow bible thumpers interpret that?


Dixie, stop lying. You one of those old testament fire and brimstone racists.

You're on record saying that if it were up to you, women who get abortions should be stoned to death. Your words. You're on record with that. Your personal opinion is that women should be murdered for having an abortion.

Stop hiding behind your sheets and just come out and admit that you are an adherent to all this bullshit OT racist and sexist crap.
 
Dixie said:
God destroyed the tower and cast mankind to the four corners of the Earth and gave him different tongues (languages) [...] Fundamental believers in the Old Testament, feel this was a mandate from God, that mankind should never mix race,
Click to expand...

Separate...but... equal.
 
LadyT said:
You're missing one important step. Why do you think its valid to make the leap from "tongues" to races? What if different races speak the same language?
Click to expand...

You are asking me questions under the assumption that this is MY viewpoint, and it isn't! I've repeated that about 50 gazillion times so far! Go find someone who believes in fundamentalist religious interpretations of the Old Testament, and ask THEM the question, I have no idea!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top