judge may allow the men Kyle Rittenhouse shot to be called 'rioters' or 'looters'

gfm7175 said:
Shooting as an absolute last resort after attempting to physically remove himself from the situation is not "mass shooting", moron.
Click to expand...

He didn't try to remove himself from the situation, he fired first into the crowd, then they came to disarm him, then he fired again.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
https://www.usnews.com/news/us/arti...due-in-court-for-likely-final-motions-hearing

An Illinois man who shot three people during a protest over police brutality in Wisconsin last year was justified because the men confronted him and two of them tried to wrestle his gun away, a use-of-force expert called by the defense testified at a pretrial hearing Tuesday.

The expert, John Black, spent hours outlining the moments that led to Kyle Rittenhouse's decisions to shoot Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber and Gaige Grosskreutz, offering a preview of the defense team's strategy when Rittenhouse's trial begins next month. Black testified that video shows Rosenbaum chasing Rittenhouse and reaching for the teenager's gun, Huber attacking Rittenhouse with a skateboard and trying to wrestle away his gun, and Grosskreutz running at him with a pistol in his hand.

“A citizen in that position, given those indicators, would it be reasonable for them to believe they were about to be assaulted?” Black said. “I would argue yes."
Click to expand...

both were unarmed. how could he believe he was in fear for his life from an unarmed person? the first guy had not even touched him....the second guy reacted to the punk ass bitch walking down the street with his assault rifle with others yelling he had just shot someone, stop him, so the guy on his SKATEBOARD skated over when he fell down TO TAKE AWAY HIS GUN--HE DID NOT ATTACK HIM AS MUCH AS HE TRIED TO DISARM HIM...the third guy was shot for just walking up to the scene to help.
 
gfm7175 said:
Kyle shot those people in self defens
Click to expand...

No he didn't because they were trying to disarm him.

They were the ones acting in self-defense; Kyle was an active shooter.

And for it to be self-defense, Kyle is going to have to prove his feelings that night...and that would entail taking the stand, which he shouldn't do but I hope he does.
 
gfm7175 said:
It is perfectly lawful for Kyle to openly carry a rifle in Wisconsin.
Click to expand...

NOPE.

WRONGO.

You must be at least 18 to open carry a weapon in Wisconsin:

What Is The Age Requirement To Open Carry In Wisconsin?
You must be at least eighteen years old to open carry in Wisconsin.
https://gunlawsuits.org/gun-laws/wisconsin/open-carry/

the-hunt-crystal-may-you-fucked-up-bitch-crystal-may-the-hunt.gif
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
both were unarmed. how could he believe he was in fear for his life from an unarmed person? the first guy had not even touched him....the second guy reacted to the punk ass bitch walking down the street with his assault rifle with others yelling he had just shot someone, stop him, so the guy on his SKATEBOARD skated over when he fell down TO TAKE AWAY HIS GUN--HE DID NOT ATTACK HIM AS MUCH AS HE TRIED TO DISARM HIM...the third guy was shot for just walking up to the scene to help.
Click to expand...

stop being stupid, pussyboy. let me guess, you don't know the fucking laws any better than LV, but want to act like you know everything when you don't know shit

sit down, some adults are talking here
 
LV426 said:
No he didn't because they were trying to disarm him.

They were the ones acting in self-defense; Kyle was an active shooter.

And for it to be self-defense, Kyle is going to have to prove his feelings that night...and that would entail taking the stand, which he shouldn't do but I hope he does.
Click to expand...

if grosskreutz was armed, why didn't he shoot the active shooter? he had a gun in his hand
 
AProudLefty said:
Like Uncle said, he's a teenager and his parents are responsible for his upbringing. So to give him life in the hole would be cruel.
Click to expand...

Why would it be cruel? Because his parents did a shit job raising him? Maybe all three should be thrown in the hole?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you are clearly biased
Click to expand...

I think you're the biased one here, because your entire argument hinges on Kyle's feelings, whereas my argument hinges on the facts.

The fact is that you cannot prove you feel threatened without taking the stand in your own defense.

You said, earlier in this thread, that those guys were trying to disarm him, which is way different than trying to kill him.

Then you tried to exaggerate self defense to include guns...leading you to the argument that it would be illegal to try and disarm an active shooter because the active shooter then feels threatened for their life because the gun they used was taken from them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top