Old Trapper
Verified User
That control used to be called "abstinence", a term lost in the 60's with the feminist movement.
If the government forces you to give birth to a child,
- Thread starter BidenPresident
- Start date
That control used to be called "abstinence", a term lost in the 60's with the feminist movement.
STRAWMAN CLAIM warning!!
Government isn't forcing you to give birth. Neither did it force a woman to have unprotected sex resulting in the pregnancy.
The laws in question merely state that if you cannot make up your mind past 15 to 25 weeks, then the life of the child is considered sacrosanct. This isn't rocket science. Do leftists and the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses really think Americans are as brain dead as their constituents?
Stop already.
Old Trapper
Verified User
Not strange at all. Even in the animal kingdom it is the female that controls the sex.
WRONG. But again, preventing a pregnancy has never been easier. Also, the easiest way to avoid it is not to have unsafe sex before marriage.
I know, to dipshits on the left, this is rocket science.
Negative! Within the confines of marriage we are fine with sex, it really is great. Even outside of marriage, which we would not recommend, but we can't stop you,
be responsible, and understand what the consequences may be, and don't murder children! If you want to bash Christianity start a thread!
WRONG. But again, preventing a pregnancy has never been easier. Also, the easiest way to avoid it is not to have unsafe sex before marriage.
I know, to dipshits on the left, this is rocket science.
Yeah, but then they can't bring up, and bash something they say they don't even believe in. They spend a lot of time bashing something they say doesn't exist!
BidenPresident
Verified User
Tell that to a eunuch like the Apostle Paul.
He preferred the company of men.
'Christianity' ... is what the Abortion fuss is all about. Mind your own business.
Old Trapper
Verified User
No record of him being a homosexual.
BidenPresident
Verified User
Nor heterosexual.
Old Trapper
Verified User
When assholes quit trying to destroy the basis of morality then, and only then, will real Christians "mind their own business".
Old Trapper
Verified User
Being heterosexual is natural, and needs no record. Paul did speak against homosexuality though.
Romans 1:26,27 "For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due."
Last edited:
BidenPresident
Verified User
So no evidence Paul was heterosexual.
(shaking head) Aren't you the guys that don't want Queers to Marry?
Old Trapper
Verified User
Actually that is quite a stupid comment. Why would there be evidence of one doing what is "natural"? Or even the need for such evidence?
BidenPresident
Verified User
I never read past an insult.
Old Trapper
Verified User
For it to be called a religious ceremony, yes. A civil ceremony then who cares.
But why do you oppose any form of Christianity?
Old Trapper
Verified User
Then you read very little, and most nonsense. But it is a good excuse to avoid making an even more stupid comment for which you have no response.