Letter to scotus
I do not endorse to overturn roe v wade,, rather,, I challenge the scotus's jurisdiction.The public's referendum challenges the supreme court's jurisdiction. The public's jurisdiction is not even up to a republics jurisdiction, rather, the republic is subject to the American people's jurisdiction and mandate. The supreme court is a lower court to the court of the American people.
Roe v wade is not a legistlated enumerated right or core founding principle. It's granted only by consequence of stare decesis that gives limited legislative authority to the supreme court. Roe v wade is not a core founding american principle. For fact, women having any rights at all is not a core American founding principle. The fullness of the arguments which resulted in the supreme court's decision were incomplete at the time the decision was made. The full argument could not be presented because the final arguments invole the consequences of the decision the supreme court made. This took decades for anyone to conclusively recognize, prove, and grow to be the overwhelmingly obvious problem that it has become. Legal abortion vastly enables prostitution. Prostitution is not a right, it is a crime. It is a crime against all men who fought and/or died to bring a free and peaceful society. A society where women can be free of being raped pregnant and abandoned by random men of higher or lower station in the streets. When a woman sells her ass she commits theft on every man who fought and/or died to give them a society where they could be free of that, especially against whatever fool paid her for his own ass. Women were not given this society so that they could then have a market where they could charge us for our own sacrifice. It's a man's natural right to take a woman's ass and breed it, proven by 50,000 discovered years of it. Not some piddly bit of filth religion stuck under the fingernail of human history or some subjectivist nonsense scribbled on a piece of paper by people that thought they had station to argue with eons. However, humanity has decided rape should be illegal for more reasons than subjective concepts of morality. Because we had not and still don't have complete control over lower life forms such as std's. Some std's are so low it's debatable if they're life at all, much less so said "lower life forms." It could be argued we illegalized rape to prevent lower station humans who we wrongfully thought of as lower life forms at the time. To this day we still think of eachother as lower life forms and use criminality as the basis by which some human rights are voided. In either case, rape should remain illegal as both are seen as fitting reasons to this day. Americans have the final say what kind of America they want to live in, not scotus. The American people are the highest court in the land. Abortion rights were argued on the same argument that won the first amendment. You can not shut me up and you cannot make me say what you want me to say. You can hold a gun to my head but it's still irrevocably my choice to decide so you shouldn't even way to try someone otherwise. Nothing short of total restraint and deprivation could possibly force a woman to bring a child to birth. Such a restraint, while possible, has never been invented and certainly not invented in part long ago enough to be natural if combined today. Rope has existed for the better part of human history. Minimaly, fifty millennia. Rope is thusly natural to us but rope would not be enough. Rope might certainly help with the impregnation but even with a historically recognized restraint like rope, a woman could simply hold their breath enough to substantially harm or kill the fetus. She could deprive her own blood of enough oxygen long enough to kill the fetus and still survive, but not unharmed. Humanity has decided that we should all benefit from the medical technology we all helped to concieve and which inadvertently kills us daily anyway. Thusly women still naturally have the final right to decide and with the aid of technology. However, the convenience of modern technology has vastly enabled independent prostitution and prostitution is a crime. It transforms society, brings strife, and spreads unmastered diseases as bad as any rape might. It could be argued prostitution has existed for eons. Well, so too has pimping and they've gone hand in hand. If one is illegal so is the other, and they're both illegal. America, and the world, is crumbling. The ruling that the constitution grants women rights by the usage of "mankind" is being tested with each new riot. No where in the world are women as free and as radicalized as in the United States, acting one letter short of terrorists complete with radicalising our nations criminals against peace, tranquility, and threatening every other enumerated core American fundamental principle including the first amendment and not even short of the right to self defense. America and the whole world teeters on the brink of annihilation. Whatever we did, it has gone too far for too long. Substantial rollbacks*are nescisary. Everything preventing the population from naturally pairing off and having the best chance of finding reason to pair off, should be prevented. Next up, adultery. If anyone suspects covid might be lab leaked, and they do and there is evidence supporting that, then there are certainly lab leaked std's here now you've never even heard about them. How far do we have to hang over the edge before whatever come what may? It's out right cruelty to animals right now to be man. I must protest. I usually do that a lot louder, more insidiously and with much greater impact, but this time I felt like writing. so I hope you felt like reading.
