Scandalous new proof utterly debunks the Russia hoax, let's review the Democrat lies

Have you produced the actual investigation yet?


Let’s go


Where is the goods


Not what some smuck form town hall says is there


They are partisan hacks


Give us the investigation

Over and over. :nodyes:

You need only to muster up the literacy to click on the links and comprehend what you see. :laugh:
 

-Your sources knowingly lied to misrepresent Hillary-funded fabrications and misinformation as legitimate FBI evidence to frame a sitting U.S. president as a secret Russian agent. It completely fell apart under scrutiny, the source is now under arrest, and your tabloid trash "news" sources are now being forced to go back and retract their claims and rewrite their articles.

-Your sources were caught lyingabout President Trump telling people to inject Lysol.

-Your sources deliberately lied to ruin the life of a child with smear campaigns, slander, and death threats for wearing a MAGA hat while politely smiling at a deranged left-wing hysteric who got in his face. They were forced to pay a settlement for their lies.

-Your sources outright lied about a drug that had been proven safe and effective against coronaviruses for 50 years straight (Hydroxchloroquine) suddenly somehow being "untested" and "dangerous." They destroyed the lives of experts who proved them wrong and killed thousands of people to to push a partisan agenda. They even reversed course and finally admitted what the science had shown all along once they were using it to force through mail-in voting.

-Your sources intentionally lied to misrepresent President Trump's acknowledgement that most Americans opposed the left's ignorant Neanderthal cult practice of tearing down art, history, and monuments for not being "woke" enough...as him calling white supremacists "very fine people."

-Your sources knew for a fact that Roy Moore was not a pedophile, but deliberately lied about him being one anyway to steal an election for Democrats.

-Your sources intentionally lied to ruin the life of a child for not letting Antifa terrorists murder him. Every charge the scandalously corrupt Democrat District Attorney could fabricate to criminalize self-defense was unanimously laughed out of court.

-Your sources relentlessly lied their corrupt asses off to smear Kavanaugh as a gang rapist.

-Your sources blatantly lied about President Trump having protesters gassed so he could do a photo op in front of a church. The IG report completely debunked this widely repeated Democrat falsehood.

-Your sources falsely propped up the now thoroughly debunked Jussie Smollett hoax.

-Your sources dishonestly scaremongered people into thinking that repealing Obama's illegal, innovation-stifling Internet takeover ('Net Neutrality') was "hastening the death of the Internet" and blatantly lied with sleazy, wildly inaccurate headlines such as "So long to the Internet." The repeal happened, and nothing about the Internet changed at all.

-Your sources straight-up lied to ruin the lives of a Missouri couple for holding off violent BLM terrorists once they had already broken onto their property, destroyed things, and used lynch mob tactics to intimidate them out of their rights for being white. The scandalously corrupt Democrat prosecutor had to be removed from the case and the governor had to get involved and pardon the completely innocent couple to undo this egregious abuse of power.

-Your sources lied to downplay Biden bragging on video about blackmailing the Ukraine into firing the prosecutor in his son's corruption investigation, and then lied to stage an impeachment witch hunt against President Trump for trying to investigate Biden's already proven corruption. The witch hunt naturally failed.

Not only did your sources invent gossipy fact-free nonsense to persecute imaginary Trump corruption while ignoring actual, proven Biden corruption, but they also deceptively edited video to smear people, lied by only "fact-checking" conservatives, contradicted years of their own reporting showing that Ukraine had plotted against Trump, and were caught in 75 separate lies.

-Your sources endlessly lied about the police to falsely demonize and defund them, while also lying about defunding them, and then lied to deny the direct cause-and-effect relationship between Democrats releasing criminals, mass murderers, and terrorists, legalizing theft, and lowering penalties for murdering police officers...and the 100% preventable nationwide crime epidemic that naturally, unmistakably resulted.

-Your sources lie to conceal Democrat-incited hate crimes made possible by Democrats repeatedly releasing violent career criminals.

-Your sources followed the lead of Biden and Obama's corrupt DHS in lying to smear peaceful Tea Party protesters as terrorists who were at war with America for preferring fiscal sanity, then reversed course and lied about hundreds of violent Democrat terrorist attacks being "peaceful protests," then lied about one single non-violent act of trespassing where elderly people took selfies in the Capitol (apparently staged by the FBI) as some Pearl Harbor-level terrorist insurrection.

-Your sources lied with more than 40 separate scaremongering anti-science global warming doomsday predictions that all spectacularly failed to ever materialize.

-Your sources used obscenely dishonest, discredited, and debunked SPLC propaganda to prop up absurd false narratives smearing innocent people and suppressing evidence of Democrat bigotry and extremism.

-Your sources rushed in and blatantly lied to misrepresent video evidence of Planned Parenthood selling murdered baby parts for profit as "deceptively edited," repeating the outright lie ad nauseum until the bombshell scandal was drowned out by a blur of smear campaign noise.

-Your sources lied to smear President Trump as putting kids in cages at the border (you also get separated from your kids when you bring them to bank robberies or other crimes), deliberately misrepresenting an Obama policy as Trump's.

-Your sources intentionally lied to smear a temporary pause in importing un-vettable terror state "refugees" as a "Muslim ban."

-Your sources deliberately lied to make President Trump look like he mocked a disabled reporter based on a mannerism that he uses to describe everyone he criticizes.

-Your sources flat-out lied about President Trump calling immigrants "animals" when he was unmistakably clearly referring to violent foreign gangs instead.

-Your sources blatantly lied about Obama's scandal-plagued administration being "scandal-free."

-Your sources willfully misinformed the public into believing that you could keep your doctor and insurance under Obamacare, despite all the evidence showing the opposite.

-Your sources lied to misinform people into thinking that Obamacare would never be used to fund abortions or health care for illegal immigrants. They even smeared conservatives as uncivilized and called for them to be punished for correctly calling that an outright lie. Both happened, exactly as your sources said they never would.

-Your sources were caught lying to smear President Trump as using a Nazi eagle symbol, lying to smear President Trump as using a Nazi triangle symbol, and lying to smear President Trump as using a Nazi anthem?

-Your sources invented a flat-out lie about President Trump calling soldiers "losers" and "suckers" based on literally zero evidence, from an anonymous source (of course), while all 21 witnesses who were in the room at the time, including never-Trumper John Bolton, unanimously agree that nothing like that ever happen.

-Your sources lied about President Trump ignoring Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers. All the evidence shows that President Trump was never briefed. Your sources literally just made the entire thing up out of thin air.

My sources were proven right, yours lied. Every. Single. Time.

This diversionary "attack the source" fallacy is designed to avoid having to discuss whether or not the claim is true by stigmatizing sources that bring up any other side of the story, because their evidence is unassailable and devastating.

Next bullshit avoidance tactic please. :cool:
 
Last edited:
a-jpeg.929577
 
OK! I still believe in the Court of Law!

I'll agree with you!

No you don't. You wanted Kavanaugh railroaded. You wanted Nick Sandmann railroaded. You wanted Kyle Rittenhouse railroaded. You wanted President Trump railroaded. You are 100% AGAINST the court of law until the moment it is a Democrat being accused of something. Then it is another total 180 and endless blather about the sacred principle of "innocent until proven guilty."

Kind of like how protest is patriotic until the moment Democrats are in power. And like how YEARS of violent anarchy, riots, looting, raiding capitals, and murder is "peaceful protesting" but a handful of elderly people taking selfies in the Capitol in one single nonviolent act of trespassing is "insurrection."

You stand for nothing. The truth isn't even a distant afterthought. You are a totally dishonest demagogue. :bs:
 
And no one can give us the report it’s self


I want the goods


You guys are all talking like there are goods


Or did you shit cakes get this bubbly because those lie rags told you so?


You didn’t even verify that the report actually says what the tags said?



Oh my

Where’s the report

You claim to have read it


Give it up

The proof has been in the OP since the beginning and repeatedly pointed out. You are literally too stupid and illiterate to comprehend what has been laid directly in your lap.

giphy.gif
 
Again, if we were six years old, this might pass for some kind of devastating counterpoint. :laugh:

You're a goddamn fuckin liar who banks on people not holding the shit you say to scrutiny.

The motion said that a tech company executive gathered lookups, which are not substantive communications such as emails and texts.

So you're lying to everyone here, either because you're a malicious actor, or a brain-dead barnyard animal.
 
1) There Was No Collusion

There was never any collusion between Trump and Russia, and even those perpetuating this treasonous coup attempt knew that from the beginning.

Woodward: No Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion, I Searched For Two Years

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...mp_an d_russia_i_searched_for_two_years.html

Dossier’s 10 Core Collusion Accusations Remain Unverified 20 Months Later

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/12/trump-dossiers-10-core-collusion-accusations-unver/

‘No Evidence’ of Collusion Between Trump and Russia

https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-pr...llusion-between-trump-and-russia-890509379597

Feinstein: We Have Zero Evidence of Russian Collusion During 2016 Campaign

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...ssian-collusion-during-2016-campaign-n2322991

FBI Says No Direct Ties Between Russia, Donald Trump’s Campaign

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-fbi-says-no-direct-ties-between-russia-donald-trumps-campaign/

0 for 12: Mueller report debunks Democrats’ entire Trump-Russia dossier

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/apr/21/robert-muellers-report-debunks-russia-dossier/

The Trump Dossier Is Fake — And Here Are The Reasons Why

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulro...ier-is-false-news-and-heres-why/#7aad10396867

Even the NY Times admitted early on that the evidence didn’t add up.

https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/08/nyt-emails-undercut-trump-russia-collusion/

Even the Washington Post eventually acknowledged that the left’s phony attempts to defend the conspiracy theory held no water.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...-what-parts-steele-dossier-were-corroborated/

Even those who aggressively promoted the narrative eventually admitted it is “likely false.”

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/30/michael-steeles-russia-dossier-donald-trump-fails-/

And the FBI’s own internal documents prove the dossier was composed entirely of outright falsehoods, unverifiable gossip, or common knowledge background information that was already publicly available when the dossier was created.

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...-a-stake-through-the-heart-of-steeles-dossier

Side Note: Compare what we now know about this now-thoroughly debunked dossier to how the media has covered it:



200.webp
 
We now have even more hard evidence that it is Democrats who are the threat to "our democracy."

Not that they hadn't already made that clear by:

-helping illegal immigrants break into our country by the millions and illegally vote,

-doxing, censoring, and canceling people who disprove their narratives, and burning down cities while protecting terrorists and persecuting anyone who fights back,

-protecting voter fraud,

-incessantly trying to overthrow elections they lose with hoaxes and coup attempts,

-staging 1/6,

-weaponizing government agencies to destroy and silence their opponents,

-shutting down four Democrat-run battleground states at the finish line of a landslide defeat and reopening hours later with a literally mathematically impossible complete reversal in the results.


But I digress...

We already had proof positive that Democrats doctored fake evidence, lied to a federal judge, and illegally spied on a sitting U.S. president to overthrow an election they lost (with the news media laundering their made-up evidence to make it look like it came from DOJ and FBI), but now that it's an irrefutable fact, let's review all the lies your "legitimate, not tabloid trash at all" news sources told you and ask ourselves...

...How many times must Democrats be humiliated by unassailable proof that their sources constantly lie to them and deliberately misinform them into committing heinous betrayals of everything this country stands for (like this un-American attack on 'our democracy') before they comprehend that perhaps they should re-evaluate their poisonous, deranged extremist worldview and the seditious traitors who manipulate them into betraying their country at every turn?

View attachment 21912

1) "There’s no real evidence," she said. "This is ’60 Minutes.’ We can’t put on things we can’t verify."

There was unmistakable proof documenting the spying as far back as FOUR YEARS AGO. Our corrupt, biased news media, who were in on the coup, simply talked right past it like it wasn't being laid directly in their laps.

Putting on "things we can't verify" is ALL the news media appear to do.

2) "Nothing happens and they just move on to the next conspiracy theory," Lemon said to Cuomo during a handover. "It is never going to end and guess what? People who want to believe that BS are going to believe it."

Projection much? Again, now we have even more proof that it is DEMOCRATS who move from one BS conspiracy theory to the next with zero accountability. Everything Democrats assert turns out to be a bold-faced, intentional, pot-calling-the-kettle-black lie.

3) In an October 2021 episode of MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show," host Rachel Maddow suggested the intention behind efforts to probe the investigation was always to re-route the investigation away from Trump himself. "It’s a boomerang," she said. "Because it’s apparently an ongoing, concerted Republican and pro-Trump project to try to turn the investigation of the Russia scandal into some kind of scandal itself."

Deflecting about deflecting. Sane people proving that the most ludicrous Democrat conspiracy theory of all time was a staged frame job from the beginning is apparently somehow THEM being the conspiracy theorists.

Got to appreciate the "next level" asinine lunatic extremism of Rachel Maddow. :laugh:

'60 Minutes,' CNN, MSNBC, downplayed, criticized Durham probe of Russia investigation

And as always, the moment some devastating bombshell evidence emerges proving that everything Democrats have spent YEARS building their entire lie-based worldview on was a known, deliberate falsehood from the beginning...our "enemy of the American people" news media, who were literally intentional co-conspirators in this gross act of treason, respond by imposing a total media blackout and silencing anyone who points it out.

View attachment 21913

And the Democrat terrorist cult burns more books and cheers.

For the record, even Democrats now want Hillary investigated for outright treason at this point, even according to their own bullshit polling pseudo-science.

Nothing new here, pretty much exactly what one could hear turning on AM radio or Fox any time of the day
 
"Last night, I congratulated Donald Trump and offered to work with him on behalf of our country ... Donald Trump is going to be our president. We owe him an open mind and the chance to lead."
Hillary Clinton, November 9, 2016.

Clinton didn't file 60+ lawsuits over losing the election, despite winning 3 million more votes...

1) Because President Trump didn't rush in and close down four Republican-controlled battleground states at the finish line of a landslide defeat and then reopen them hours later with a literally mathematically impossible total reversal in the outcome.

Comprehend the difference yet? :awesome:

2) And what she DID do was spend the next five years blaming everyone other than herself and lying about the election being stolen. If you're going to lie, at least make it something that we can't instantly and effortlessly disprove with literally dozens of Hillary quotes showing her doing the exact opposite of what you're claiming.

:laugh:

3) And what relevance does any of this have to what's being discussed? :thinking:

She didn't have her supporters overrun Congress the following January.

No one else did either. :dunno:

Simply repeating a falsehood that is proven false by Trump directly instructing his supporters to resist the theft of the presidency peacefully doesn't magically make it become true.

Grow up and try having an iota or two of integrity. :bs:

200.webp


She didn't divide the country by claiming to be the rightful President a year later.

She absolutely DID CONSTANTLY claim to have had the election stolen from her. And that is IN ADDITION TO framing a sitting U.S. President as a traitor and directly telling her supporters not to be civil with their opponents. She is literally the MOST DIVISIVE FIGURE IN ALL OF WASHINGTON.

Do you EVER tell the truth? :rofl2:

As to Kremlin interference in the election:

1) The FBI started investigating it in July 2016.
2) Clinton campaign lawyer Sussmann is accused of lying to the FBI in September 2016.

Trumpsters would like you to think that 2) caused 1).

Of course. Because the Hillary-funded propaganda (the dossier) was spoon-fed to the FBI to make it look like it came from them, to legitimize a known, outright lie. This is very old news and common knowledge. Your tabloid trash partisan propaganda mills humiliate and discredit you by rendering you so ignorant and misinformed.

:palm:
 
Another Trump failure; didn't lock up Hillary. Sad. Fat boys don't score.

comey mueller obstruction.jpg

What a winning strategy. Taunt people by flaunting your utterly one-sided Democrat privilege as some kind of failure of your opponents. Just in case there was anyone left who still mistook the left for something other than vile, enthusiastically unjust psychopaths.

:laugh:
 
Personally I think Durham has the goods on them. I doubt he would have brought a case this controversial if he didn't have strong evidence. What will you do if this turns out to be true?

There is no "if." We've had the evidence for four years now, and pointed it out at every turn. The hoax has always been debunked.
 
We now have even more hard evidence that it is Democrats who are the threat to "our democracy."

Not that they hadn't already made that clear by:

-helping illegal immigrants break into our country by the millions and illegally vote,

-doxing, censoring, and canceling people who disprove their narratives, and burning down cities while protecting terrorists and persecuting anyone who fights back,

-protecting voter fraud,

-incessantly trying to overthrow elections they lose with hoaxes and coup attempts,

-staging 1/6,

-weaponizing government agencies to destroy and silence their opponents,

-shutting down four Democrat-run battleground states at the finish line of a landslide defeat and reopening hours later with a literally mathematically impossible complete reversal in the results.


But I digress...

We already had proof positive that Democrats doctored fake evidence, lied to a federal judge, and illegally spied on a sitting U.S. president to overthrow an election they lost (with the news media laundering their made-up evidence to make it look like it came from DOJ and FBI), but now that it's an irrefutable fact, let's review all the lies your "legitimate, not tabloid trash at all" news sources told you and ask ourselves...

...How many times must Democrats be humiliated by unassailable proof that their sources constantly lie to them and deliberately misinform them into committing heinous betrayals of everything this country stands for (like this un-American attack on 'our democracy') before they comprehend that perhaps they should re-evaluate their poisonous, deranged extremist worldview and the seditious traitors who manipulate them into betraying their country at every turn?

View attachment 21912

1) "There’s no real evidence," she said. "This is ’60 Minutes.’ We can’t put on things we can’t verify."

There was unmistakable proof documenting the spying as far back as FOUR YEARS AGO. Our corrupt, biased news media, who were in on the coup, simply talked right past it like it wasn't being laid directly in their laps.

Putting on "things we can't verify" is ALL the news media appear to do.

2) "Nothing happens and they just move on to the next conspiracy theory," Lemon said to Cuomo during a handover. "It is never going to end and guess what? People who want to believe that BS are going to believe it."

Projection much? Again, now we have even more proof that it is DEMOCRATS who move from one BS conspiracy theory to the next with zero accountability. Everything Democrats assert turns out to be a bold-faced, intentional, pot-calling-the-kettle-black lie.

3) In an October 2021 episode of MSNBC's "The Rachel Maddow Show," host Rachel Maddow suggested the intention behind efforts to probe the investigation was always to re-route the investigation away from Trump himself. "It’s a boomerang," she said. "Because it’s apparently an ongoing, concerted Republican and pro-Trump project to try to turn the investigation of the Russia scandal into some kind of scandal itself."

Deflecting about deflecting. Sane people proving that the most ludicrous Democrat conspiracy theory of all time was a staged frame job from the beginning is apparently somehow THEM being the conspiracy theorists.

Got to appreciate the "next level" asinine lunatic extremism of Rachel Maddow. :laugh:

'60 Minutes,' CNN, MSNBC, downplayed, criticized Durham probe of Russia investigation

And as always, the moment some devastating bombshell evidence emerges proving that everything Democrats have spent YEARS building their entire lie-based worldview on was a known, deliberate falsehood from the beginning...our "enemy of the American people" news media, who were literally intentional co-conspirators in this gross act of treason, respond by imposing a total media blackout and silencing anyone who points it out.

View attachment 21913

And the Democrat terrorist cult burns more books and cheers.

For the record, even Democrats now want Hillary investigated for outright treason at this point, even according to their own bullshit polling pseudo-science.

Not according to the... (what was it someone called it?... was it patsies?...) patsies of the left who will still tell you that the former President "colluded with Russia" in order to get a hotel. Yeah, I literally just read it...
 
Michael Steele is under arrest?

The arrest of the man behind the phony dossier underscores the many lies of the Russia hoax

What claims from the media will be retracted?

WaPo walkback: Paper yanks chunks of stories based on discredited Steele dossier

The Mueller report lists multiple contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians.

Which is a really long way of saying "found nothing." Incoming administrations can be found on the record talking to EVERY foreign government. There is nothing even remotely unusual or controversial about this. This is literally just Democrats pretending that something ordinary is something scandalous without a single shred of evidence.

:bs:

What Mueller couldn't find evidence of was conspiracy to defraud.

A really long way of saying "couldn't find evidence of guilt." :nono:

Mueller states that Trump was willing to accept the help of the Russians but there was no evidence of coordination.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download

Mueller literally tortured people and threatened to destroy the lives of their families if they didn't make false confessions. Mueller saying something in no way indicates that it is true. He repeatedly proved himself to be an obscenely corrupt and biased establishment hack. All that matters is what he can prove, which is literally nothing, because it was a staged hoax, which we have irrefutable proof of.

How about we just deal with your first five responses and then move onto your other 50 once those are addressed, since you are apparently one of these people who tries to compensate for having no real counterpoints by injecting quantity-over-quality mountains of blather to outtalk your opponents instead of refuting them?

:bs:
 
The only thing smoking are the people that think Durham's filing is evidence of any criminal activity by Clinton or her campaign.

We don't NEED him to present any new evidence. We've already had it all for more than three years, and been pointing it out at every turn while Democrats just pretend it away and talk right past it. But yes, he has already added new facts and evidence to the pile.

:nodyes:

Also, Democrats pronounced people guilty throughout this entire hoax based on literally nothing. But suddenly, even with the source of the hoax being under arrest and indictments being handed down, that's all just "nothing to see here."

Fake and dishonest, much? :awesome:

Durham makes no such claim and he doesn't make that claim for a very real reason. It would be a violation of his prosecutorial duties to claim a crime when he has no evidence.

And Comey cited more than a hundred separate felonies Hillary committed in the speech where he admitted that nothing would be done about any of it. Please stop lying about there being no evidence of Hillary committing massive, unprecedented crimes against the Constitution and the republic.

She makes Benedict Arnold look loyal.
 
ROFLMAO. 12 jurors are going to decide what? If you are insane and a threat to yourself?

12 jurors will never see a case claiming Hillary spied on Trump because there is no evidence of that happening let alone of a crime that could be charged and brought to a jury.
First reason is any crimes committed in 2016 are now past the statute of limitations so they can't be brought. Second reason is no court will allow a trial to occur without evidence of a crime.

Talking past all the evidence that's been posted over and over doesn't just magically make it all go away. The proof is absolutely overwhelming, no matter how relentlessly you avoid addressing or refuting one single piece of it.

:bs:
 
Back
Top