Obama to raise 10-year deficit to $9 trillion

meme

New member
Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:50pm EDT
U.S. deficit poses potential systemic risk: Taylor
6:50pm EDTBy Jeff Mason

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration will raise its 10-year budget deficit projection to approximately $9 trillion from $7.108 trillion in a report next week, a senior administration official told Reuters on Friday.

The higher deficit figure, based on updated economic data, brings the White House budget office into line with outside estimates and gives further fuel to President Barack Obama's opponents, who say his spending plans are too expensive in light of budget shortfalls.

The White House took heat for sticking with its $7.108 trillion forecast earlier this year after the Congressional Budget Office forecast that deficits between 2010 and 2019 would total $9.1 trillion.

"The new forecasts are based on new data that reflect how severe the economic downturn was in the late fall of last year and the winter of this year," said the administration official, who is familiar with the budget mid-session review that is slated to be released next week.

"Our budget projections are now in line with the spring and summer projections that the Congressional Budget Office put out."

The White House budget office will also lower its deficit forecast for this fiscal year, which ends September 30, to $1.58 trillion from $1.84 trillion next week after removing $250 billion set aside for bank bailouts.

Record-breaking deficits have raised concerns about America's ability to finance its debt and whether the United States can maintain its top-tier AAA credit rating.

Politically, the deficit has been an albatross for Obama, a Democrat who is pushing forward with plans to overhaul the U.S. healthcare industry -- an initiative that could cost up to $1 trillion over 10 years -- and other promises, including reforming education and how the country handles energy.
DEFICIT WORRIES

Republicans have pounced on Obama for planning to spend too much when deficits are so high, and the issue is likely to loom large in next year's Congressional elections.

Obama, who has promised to halve the deficit by the end of his four-year term and likes to remind constituents he inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit from former President George W. Bush, says bringing down healthcare costs is critical to long-term deficit reduction.

Treasury markets have been worried all year about the mounting deficit. The United States relies on large foreign buyers such as China and Japan to cheaply finance its debt, and they may demand higher interest rates if they begin to doubt that the government can control its deficits.

"It's one of those underlying pieces of news that is liable to haunt the bond market at some point in the future," said Kim Rupert, managing director of global fixed income analysis at Action Economics LLC in San Francisco, referring to the revised 10-year deficit projection.

Many economists think it is unlikely the government can curtail spending, which means taxes would have to go up to cover the rising costs of providing retirement and healthcare benefits to aging Americans.

Higher taxes, which could slow economic growth, are also a major concern of voters on both sides of the political divide. Obama has promised not to raise taxes on Americans making less than $250,000 a year.

(Additional reporting by Butron Frierson in New York; editing by Chris Wilson)

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE57K4XE20090821
 
Republicans have pounced on Obama for planning to spend too much when deficits are so high
//

And that 5+ trillion bush spent during good times has no bearing at all does it.
And how much of that 10 yr projected defecit is due to Bush's actions while in office? Pill Bill? Iraq? And Tax cuts?
 
YEs, Obama does seem to be continuing the trend.

But if bush had not spent all that money what Obama is doin would be fine right?
Virtually no cons complained when Bush was spending it.

cons seem to have the logic that if they spend all but the last dollar on their credit limit on stuff, it is that last dollar spent that caused it all when they run out of credit.

Over half of our current defecit was done while Republicans were president.
But somehow them dems are the spending fools.
 
Last edited:
Republicans have pounced on Obama for planning to spend too much when deficits are so high
//

And that 5+ trillion bush spent during good times has no bearing at all does it.
And how much of that 10 yr projected defecit is due to Bush's actions while in office? Pill Bill? Iraq? And Tax cuts?

When I saw you posted on this thread I had to take you off ignore to see your response and you sir did not disappoint.

Before even starting I remember a recent thread on the deficit that you jumped into and anyone who brought up Obama and the deficit you asked if they complained the same during the Bush years or else they were a hypocrite. Kind of funny you are doing exactly what you mocked.

Obama raised his deficit projection another $2 trillion dollars today. Please tell me how a pill bill signed in 2003 or 2004 is going to cause Obama to raise his deficit projections six years later? The pill costs have already been included in ongoing projections. The Iraq War? Obama is coming close to ending it. He's removing troops. That would be lowering costs not raising them. And Bush's tax cuts will expire according to Obama which supposedly will bring in more money. How will that add to the deficit?

You used to try and call Damo out and say the closet door is opening. Look in the mirror my friend. You claim you have no hero's and you don't worship Obama. Congratulations. But you defend him like the partisan hacks you attempt to mock.
 
After the recession is over he should raise taxes or cut spending. There's no excuse for continuing deficit spending until 2019.

But raising the deficit is probably the least politically unpopular out of the three.
 
But if bush had not spent all that money what Obama is doin would be fine right?
Virtually no cons complained when Bush was spending it.

I feel Obama is doing the best he can with the economy that was handed to him.

There are some areas that I am disappointed and I voice it here and also to him, well, his WH email, or a call.

There is such a huge list of reforms that he can not do them all, but I do believe that health care reform is a major must do. I wish that both parties would work in earnest with the President to accomplish this, but I know I am a dreamer.

I didn't agree with him on letting some of the Bush policy just fade into obscurity, but, he can only do so much and he has to pick his battles, not an easy chore, because as we know, when you are the President, you are damned if you do and damned if you don't!

It just matters which side has the highest majority at voting time! You and I have seen enough elections to know this to be a fact.
 
After the recession is over he should raise taxes or cut spending. There's no excuse for continuing deficit spending until 2019.

But raising the deficit is probably the least politically unpopular out of the three.

This is so simple and yet, brilliant. Congress should work with him! No pork, all need!
 
Wasn't it Cheney that said, Reagan showed us that deficit don't matter?

clinton added 1.7 trillion during his presidency.
reagan inherited 1 trillion in debt so that leaves 10 trillion - 2.7 = 7.3 trillion in debt attributed to Reagan, BushI and II out of 10 trillion.


Now the Republicans start worrying about the debt?
 
Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:50pm EDT
U.S. deficit poses potential systemic risk: Taylor
6:50pm EDTBy Jeff Mason

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration will raise its 10-year budget deficit projection to approximately $9 trillion from $7.108 trillion in a report next week, a senior administration official told Reuters on Friday.

The higher deficit figure, based on updated economic data, brings the White House budget office into line with outside estimates and gives further fuel to President Barack Obama's opponents, who say his spending plans are too expensive in light of budget shortfalls.

The White House took heat for sticking with its $7.108 trillion forecast earlier this year after the Congressional Budget Office forecast that deficits between 2010 and 2019 would total $9.1 trillion.

"The new forecasts are based on new data that reflect how severe the economic downturn was in the late fall of last year and the winter of this year," said the administration official, who is familiar with the budget mid-session review that is slated to be released next week.

"Our budget projections are now in line with the spring and summer projections that the Congressional Budget Office put out."

The White House budget office will also lower its deficit forecast for this fiscal year, which ends September 30, to $1.58 trillion from $1.84 trillion next week after removing $250 billion set aside for bank bailouts.

Record-breaking deficits have raised concerns about America's ability to finance its debt and whether the United States can maintain its top-tier AAA credit rating.

Politically, the deficit has been an albatross for Obama, a Democrat who is pushing forward with plans to overhaul the U.S. healthcare industry -- an initiative that could cost up to $1 trillion over 10 years -- and other promises, including reforming education and how the country handles energy.
DEFICIT WORRIES

Republicans have pounced on Obama for planning to spend too much when deficits are so high, and the issue is likely to loom large in next year's Congressional elections.

Obama, who has promised to halve the deficit by the end of his four-year term and likes to remind constituents he inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit from former President George W. Bush, says bringing down healthcare costs is critical to long-term deficit reduction.

Treasury markets have been worried all year about the mounting deficit. The United States relies on large foreign buyers such as China and Japan to cheaply finance its debt, and they may demand higher interest rates if they begin to doubt that the government can control its deficits.

"It's one of those underlying pieces of news that is liable to haunt the bond market at some point in the future," said Kim Rupert, managing director of global fixed income analysis at Action Economics LLC in San Francisco, referring to the revised 10-year deficit projection.

Many economists think it is unlikely the government can curtail spending, which means taxes would have to go up to cover the rising costs of providing retirement and healthcare benefits to aging Americans.

Higher taxes, which could slow economic growth, are also a major concern of voters on both sides of the political divide. Obama has promised not to raise taxes on Americans making less than $250,000 a year.

(Additional reporting by Butron Frierson in New York; editing by Chris Wilson)

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE57K4XE20090821

I bet the left won't read this beyond the first paragraph.
 
Most of the left (on here at least) does not like the defecit spending either. But it is more acceptable during a horrible recession than during the boom years of Bush.
 
But Obama's planning near trillion dollar deficits until 2019.

He should pass greater taxes on the wealthy, a VAT, or find some creative cuts. I think a balanced budget amendment with an exception for war AND recessions would get enough political support to finally pass the house and senate.
 
I bet the left won't read this beyond the first paragraph.

It seems like only yesterday that every time I tuned in a cable News channel or looked at a front page the Alarm read :

"We're mortgaging our childrens future ! ! !"

Heard that lately ? Me neither.

Wonder what changed...
 
It seems like only yesterday that every time I tuned in a cable News channel or looked at a front page the Alarm read :

"We're mortgaging our childrens future ! ! !"

Heard that lately ? Me neither.

Wonder what changed...

The ONE is president now, so it doesn't matter what he does.
 
I wonder if the fact Obama has upgraded his numbers doesn't mean the CBO had better update their calculations.....if Obama concedes $9t, it may be up to $11t......
 
LOL


I like the NY Times version, surprised they left the last paragraph in. Must be more of those racist media that Gov. David Paterson was talking about.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/08/21/us/politics/AP-US-Obama-Budget.html?_r=2

Such deficits have always prompted Congress and the White House to take politically painful steps to curb them, such as former President Bill Clinton’s tax-heavy 1993 deficit reduction plan. A companion effort by Obama could force him to break his promise to not raise taxes on individuals making less than $200,000 a year.
 
Republicans have pounced on Obama for planning to spend too much when deficits are so high
//

And that 5+ trillion bush spent during good times has no bearing at all does it.
And how much of that 10 yr projected defecit is due to Bush's actions while in office? Pill Bill? Iraq? And Tax cuts?
Aint that the truth. Reagan and W spend money they didn't have like drunken sailors. Pushed this nation into trillions of debt and I didn't hear one freaken peep out of people like Meme. What a fuckin hypocrit.
 
Back
Top