Cops have no constitutional duty to protect you
- Thread starter LV426
- Start date
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
You keep dodging it very nicely. Especially the conversation about "electors" which is on the same thread as the quotes below:
the world is a strange and difficult place for morons
take you - you obviously agree that people have a right to life. but you also are shocked to find that we can't make cops risk their life.
You said you didn't vote in the last election!
So if you say you hate something, then that means you hate it.
Do words not mean what they mean anymore?
The representative government over the last near century is what you hate...so when I said you hate multiracial, pluralistic democracy, what do you think I was referring to?
First of all, it has never crossed my mind to overthrow the government by force because I don't like the results of the election.
Secondly, I was not the one bombarding the boards with accusations of fraud in the 2020 election...accusations I'm 99% sure you levied yourself either in the buildup to the election, or in the two months after it.
So you say the government is illegitimate and has been for a century, and then when the time came where you could actually do something about it, you choked.
You lack the will and courage to act on the bullshit you posture here on JPP.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
again with the assumptions. Just because I PREDICTED jan 6 does not mean I planned or participated in it..........but I think that's beyond your intellect level
Don't think I don't notice how you're trying to change the subject away from your membership in that terrorist hate group...a terror hate group you left not because of their hatred that you LOVE, you left because you didn't agree with what? Cuz those terrorists say exactly what you've been saying on this thread.
So you never really left the ideology of the group, you just left the group.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Therefore you have a Constitutional right and duty to protect yourself.
When you only have seconds, the police are just minutes away.
They'll have your carcass hauled off and half-ass try to catch who did it..kinda.
No it wasn't.
That was not their duty.
They do not have that duty; SCOTUS said so back in 2005.
The cops acted exactly the way they did because they aren't Constitutionally bound to protect and serve, and don't really give a shit about dead children.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Not a lawyer, but the SCOTUS decision was about domestic violence and restraining orders. I'm not sure how it applies to the Uvalde situation.
Also, while there may not be a Constitutional requirement for police to arrest or protect, there might be state or municipal requirements or procedures.
Again, I'm content to await completion of the investigation.
How's that boot taste?
Also, everyone was already killed...at least, that's what the cops are saying.
I personally don't believe the mass shooter killed all the kids in that school...I think the keystone Uvalde cops killed a couple, which is why we will NEVER see the autopsy report on all the victims and why we will never get a true, full, uncensored report on the failures that occurred that day.
It's been almost 5 years and we still don't have a report on the Paddock shooting that NV cops promised was coming.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
This is not a current event, faggot. It's from 17 years ago.
"June 28, 2005"
"The decision, with an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia and dissents from Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, overturned a ruling by a federal appeals court in Colorado. "
W. was president and it was pre-crash crazy house prices and mortgage times.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Correct....and now we're back to your Keyboard Kommando status. LOL
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you're lying again, or your memory is that shitty. I told everyone here I voted for jorgensen......unless you want to claim that a 3rd party vote is not voting?
If I say I hate the current president, that must mean I hate all presidents? that must mean you hate biden, right?
deflection.........that all you have? if you need to remain that vague so you can claim a 'gotcha', i'm just gonna let your lying ass rant
more bullshit projection and deflection. you like that patriot act, do you?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
ok, karen
We aren't going to get a single report from anyone on this.
Just like we never got a report on the Paddock shooting in Vegas 5 years ago.
The feds aren't going to conduct an investigation and even if they did, the TX authorities won't cooperate...they already aren't cooperating with the city council.
You sure about that? Sure seems like the cops want it to happen again so they can whine and bitch about how scared they are of an AR-15, yet won't have their police union put pressure on lawmakers to ban it.
All cops are bad.
OK, if I do prove it, what do I get? Cuz I'm not doing that work for free.
OK, but what if I do? What if your memory isn't as good as you're making it out to be? What if I find a post of yours that directly questions the integrity of the election?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you won't be able to prove it.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Your hysteria is the main obstacle to career success. OTOH, if all you want to do is stay home and eat bon-bons while hubby works, then you've certainly found your niche.
For your reading pleasure. Pages 126-127 are good: https://www.lvmpd.com/en-us/Documents/1-October-FIT-Criminal-Investigative-Report-FINAL_080318.pdf
LVMPD Criminal Investigative Report of the 1 October Mass Casualty Shooting
August 3, 2018