Acorn - We Have No Shame

Southern Man said:
Actually I stated my desire for Obama to fail before his inauguration; hardly a "n---- parrot".

The DC TEA Party has been shown to have had approximately 1.7 million participants.
Click to expand...

Did you wish for Bush to fail? If so, you got your wish.

political-pictures-george-bush-fail.jpg
 
Last edited:
Southern Man said:
Actually I stated my desire for Obama to fail before his inauguration; hardly a "n---- parrot".

So being an ass and hoping for the man who won the election fair & square before the inauguration ceremony makes you better than the assholes who did so afterward?

Don't think so.

And I see you're STILL trying to fly that dog about "neocon" being a racial slur. A foolish endeavor on your part....because everytime I ask you to explain how that can be when the neocon leadership and major media advocates are NOT of one racial, ethnic or religious group...you just blow smoke and dodge the question. Only a neocon clown trying to avoid the stigma of his like minded advocates actions would try to pass an abbreviation for the label of "new conservative" as a racial/ethnic slur. But then again, facts and logic were never your strong point.
The DC TEA Party has been shown to have had approximately 1.7 million participants.
Click to expand...
Tell it to the local police and fire dept. You know, the people who's profession is to assess such things in case an emergency occurs. They've got different take than your neocon sources. Of course, that would require you to actually pay attention to news sources outside your usual scope...so this could be a challenge for you. ;)
 
Taichiliberal said:
Poor Annie...like all intellectually stunted neocon parrots, when she can't logically or factually support or defend her assertions, she believes having a snarky last word is an adequate substitute. How sad. Carry on.
Click to expand...
LOL. :D

snarky and the last word there, TL... Good job!
 
Taichiliberal said:
Someone should clue her in that Obama did not TRAIN Acorn, he was a lawyer that represented them. As for the insinuation of unsavory funds "passing hands", I'd like to see her proof of illegal campaign contributions from Acorn to the Obama campaign.
Click to expand...

1) Obama did train ACORN staff, it's a matter of public knowledge, 2) yes, he did act as their lawyer, and 3) even a dollar paid as a campaign contribution to Obama would have been a violation of their 501(c)(3) classification since they accept federal funds.....

thus, we seem to have evidence of three false statements made by you...
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you are misunderstanding....Damo was mocking Touchie for "getting in the last snarky word" simultaneously with complaining that you were getting in the last snarky word......
Click to expand...

I'm a tad dense, still fail to follow. Seems to me Damo was agreeing with TL.
 
TuTu Monroe said:
Here's another one.

YouTube - Barack Obama Trained ACORN Staff In How To Intimidate Banks Into Giving Subprime Loans. Barack Obama—A Thug With A Law Degree
Click to expand...

Pressuring banks? You have got to be kidding.

As for the defaulted mortgages the money wasted on the Iraq war could have paid for all those mortgages.

Just imagine. All those people could have had free houses if the money spent on the Iraq war had been used in a different manner. And McCain was running around singing, "Bomb , bomb, bomb. Bomb, bomb Iran."

What is with the Conservative mentality? God forbid anyone should get something for nothing but its fine to throw money away on a war.
 
apple0154 said:
Pressuring banks? You have got to be kidding.

As for the defaulted mortgages the money wasted on the Iraq war could have paid for all those mortgages.

Just imagine. All those people could have had free houses if the money spent on the Iraq war had been used in a different manner. And McCain was running around singing, "Bomb , bomb, bomb. Bomb, bomb Iran."

What is with the Conservative mentality? God forbid anyone should get something for nothing but its fine to throw money away on a war.
Click to expand...

Obama is seeking to mandate more risky, low-income loans in new financial rules. I object to that. The problem with the last one was with Barney Frank and Company.

Could have, would have is just looking back and that doesn't solve anything. I see Obama is considering sending more troops to Afghanistan. After all, he did say that was a good war in his campaign speeches.




 
TuTu Monroe said:
Obama is seeking to mandate more risky, low-income loans in new financial rules. I object to that. The problem with the last one was with Barney Frank and Company.

Could have, would have is just looking back and that doesn't solve anything. I see Obama is considering sending more troops to Afghanistan. After all, he did say that was a good war in his campaign speeches.
Click to expand...

As Obama has repeatedly stated the war in Afghanistan was bungled. It's apparent Bush's plan was to stay there indefinitely by just sending enough troops to "balance" things out. No win, no lose. Just never-ending occupation.

We saw that with the news reports. Taliban driven out of area "A" and move to area "B". Troops move on the area "B". Taliban reemerge in area "A". Troops move back to area "A". On and on it goes, year after year.

Then on to Baghdad. Same old, same old.

Obama is stuck with the mess and one part of the mess is the people who sided with the US. People who the US are now protecting. In simple terms the US instigated a civil war in Iraq and Afghanistan promising to help one side. What do we do about those people?

As Obama has said it's a mess. It's complicated.

What people perceive as Obama appeasing tyrants is nothing more than the US minding it's own business. He doesn't want to start the same nonsense in Iran and Syria and North Korea that has happened in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He's trying to end wars as opposed to looking for ways to start them.
 
apple0154 said:
As Obama has repeatedly stated the war in Afghanistan was bungled. It's apparent Bush's plan was to stay there indefinitely by just sending enough troops to "balance" things out. No win, no lose. Just never-ending occupation.

We saw that with the news reports. Taliban driven out of area "A" and move to area "B". Troops move on the area "B". Taliban reemerge in area "A". Troops move back to area "A". On and on it goes, year after year.

Then on to Baghdad. Same old, same old.

Obama is stuck with the mess and one part of the mess is the people who sided with the US. People who the US are now protecting. In simple terms the US instigated a civil war in Iraq and Afghanistan promising to help one side. What do we do about those people?

As Obama has said it's a mess. It's complicated.

What people perceive as Obama appeasing tyrants is nothing more than the US minding it's own business. He doesn't want to start the same nonsense in Iran and Syria and North Korea that has happened in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He's trying to end wars as opposed to looking for ways to start them.
Click to expand...
How far can you twist yourself to justify his ineptitude? Bush was wrong. Ok, so Obama is going along with the wrong.

Bush was right, but not for the right reasons?
 
apple0154 said:
As Obama has repeatedly stated the war in Afghanistan was bungled. It's apparent Bush's plan was to stay there indefinitely by just sending enough troops to "balance" things out. No win, no lose. Just never-ending occupation.

We saw that with the news reports. Taliban driven out of area "A" and move to area "B". Troops move on the area "B". Taliban reemerge in area "A". Troops move back to area "A". On and on it goes, year after year.

Then on to Baghdad. Same old, same old.

Obama is stuck with the mess and one part of the mess is the people who sided with the US. People who the US are now protecting. In simple terms the US instigated a civil war in Iraq and Afghanistan promising to help one side. What do we do about those people?

As Obama has said it's a mess. It's complicated.

What people perceive as Obama appeasing tyrants is nothing more than the US minding it's own business. He doesn't want to start the same nonsense in Iran and Syria and North Korea that has happened in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He's trying to end wars as opposed to looking for ways to start them.
Click to expand...

Obama better do something about Iran besides just having tea with them, otherwise we will have World War III.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top