The top ten POOREST states are all RED states: MS, WV, AL, LA, KY, AR, SC, OK, TN, TX

T. A. Gardner said:
522fa20669bedd4343d8584c


284cf86bfc698beffa2819eedd72af5f.jpg
Click to expand...

I’m talking about a link for the graph that claimed New Hampshire was the wealthiest state. I’d like to know the data they used to come to that conclusion because I’ve never heard that stated before
 
cawacko said:
I’m talking about a link for the graph that claimed New Hampshire was the wealthiest state. I’d like to know the data they used to come to that conclusion because I’ve never heard that stated before
Click to expand...

I never said anything about New Hampshire.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I never said anything about New Hampshire.
Click to expand...

You posted a graph from Home Snacks listing states from poorest to richest and it claims New Hampshire is the richest. If you have a link to that I’d love to see the data they used to come to that conclusion
 
cawacko said:
You posted a graph from Home Snacks listing states from poorest to richest and it claims New Hampshire is the richest. If you have a link to that I’d love to see the data they used to come to that conclusion
Click to expand...

Most lists put New Hampshire around 6th to 8th as most richest. I don't have the information on how that particular group came to their conclusion. Maryland is frequently listed as richest when Washington DC is included as part of that state (like that's a surprise...).
 
ExpressLane said:
And have some of the largest black populations in the United States.
Click to expand...

And many are very small in population. A state with 20 million gets billions more in SNAP funds than a state with 900,000 although we are comparing one state with another.

The blue states also have tend to have more income inequality than the red states.

The blue states tend to have higher property taxes than red states allowing the residents to deduct more from their federal income taxes than a person with the same income from a lower property tax state.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
By acknowledging that the reason people are leaving high cost areas like the NE and California is for states offering lower cost of living and opportunity.
Click to expand...

More have left the rural areas, and those who leave for red states aren't going to podunk towns...they're going to the urban centers LIKE ATLANTA or AUSTIN or HOUSTON or CHARLOTTE.

They're not going to Carrollton.

Urban areas have gained population over the last decade while rural areas lost it.
 
LV426 said:
More have left the rural areas, and those who leave for red states aren't going to podunk towns...they're going to the urban centers LIKE ATLANTA or AUSTIN or HOUSTON or CHARLOTTE.

They're not going to Carrollton.

Urban areas have gained population over the last decade while rural areas lost it.
Click to expand...

Their choice. God bless America. Why do you hate the rural areas so much that you attack those who won't leave for the cities, Ms. LV?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
True most jobs are in the cities.
Click to expand...

And also true that most people in the US live in or adjacent to the cities.

And also true that rural areas are bleeding population while urban centers are growing.

Take Los Angeles, for instance...you hear all the time about how a handful of people left California between 2012-2022, but you don't hear about how Los Angeles gained 200,000 people over that same amount of time.

You also hear idiots like Flash and Cawacko say that CA is losing population, but you don't hear them say that San Francisco gained 100,000 people between 2011 and 2020.

So who left California, then? The people who live in the shitty, red, rural areas because the urban centers have all grown consistently since 2011, according to the data.
 
LV426 said:
There's that condescension again, which is your defense mechanism for when you put your foot in your mouth.
Click to expand...
Sweetie, the condescension is the person constantly attacking those who live in rural areas as unwashed, dumbass hillbillies.
 
LV426 said:
And also true that most people in the US live in or adjacent to the cities.

And also true that rural areas are bleeding population while urban centers are growing.

Take Los Angeles, for instance...you hear all the time about how a handful of people left California between 2012-2022, but you don't hear about how Los Angeles gained 200,000 people over that same amount of time.

You also don't hear idiots like Flash and Cawacko say that CA is losing population, but you don't hear them say that San Francisco gained 100,000 people between 2011 and 2020.

So who left California, then? The people who live in the shitty, red, rural areas because the urban centers have all grown consistently since 2011, according to the data.
Click to expand...

You must be very pleased, Ms. LV. :thup:

When you go to McDonald's for your Big Mac and Fries, do you believe the food is made in the McDonald's factory in town?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Sure, young people want adventure and the sights and sounds of the Big City. Do you recall what happened to all the Yuppies and Guppies after 9/11?
Click to expand...

They stayed in NYC.

In 2000, there were 8,008,278 people living in NYC.

In 2020, there were 8,804,190 people living in NYC.

Is 8,008,278 > or < 8,804,190?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top