Piers Morgan: Meghan and Harry are repulsive narcissistic hypocrites

Primavera said:
People welcomed her with open arms, but it soon became apparent that she wanted the trappings of wealth and the adulation without actually doing anything. Harry is too weak to say no to her sadly, still William is a good 'un who will make an excellent king as will Catherine an excellent queen. People in the UK just wish that Ginger and Whinger would shut the fuck up and just disappear.
Click to expand...

Because they dared to express themselves in a way that offended your precious, magical, pointless institution.
 
Primavera said:
There you go, I knew it wouldn't be long before the real you appeared. I doubt that many even knew she had a black mother until the wedding, but of course she's only black when it suits you.
Click to expand...

Why are you so triggered by the word "Black"? You know what that typically indicates, don't you? She's not only Black when it suits "me" (what a numbingly stupid thing to say). She's also never not Black. See how identity works?
 
Primavera said:
People welcomed her with open arms, but it soon became apparent that she wanted the trappings of wealth and the adulation without actually doing anything. Harry is too weak to say no to her sadly, still William is a good 'un who will make an excellent king as will Catherine an excellent queen. People in the UK just wish that Ginger and Whinger would shut the fuck up and just disappear.
Click to expand...

William is kinda a non entity though? He is just there. Or is that what is looked for in a king?
 
Hawkeye10 said:
To those who give Charles shit I say just look at Diana....he had no idea what a headcase she was when he married her....which ya is partly his fault.....but....

How much does one have a right to expect out of a man?
Click to expand...

Partly his fault? Like 90%, I would say. He didn't have the balls to marry Camilla when both were available. He let himself be swayed by the monarchy's ridiculous belief that his bride had to be a virgin.
 
christiefan915 said:
FCOL she was a single woman! She could date whomever she wanted. Her death came from the endless hounding by the paps.
Click to expand...

Her death was caused by her not wearing a seatbelt and being in a car driven by a drunk driver. Aided and abetted by Dodi Fayed's insistence that Henri Paul speed up to lose the paparazzi on motorbikes. A French investigation determined that the driver Henri Paul, approached the entrance to the road tunnel doing 70 mph, 40mph over the speed limit.
 
Last edited:
christiefan915 said:
Partly his fault? Like 90%, I would say. He didn't have the balls to marry Camilla when both were available. He let himself be swayed by the monarchy's ridiculous belief that his bride had to be a virgin.
Click to expand...

He was not free to do what he wanted, what he thought best.....it was a different time.
 
I have seen enough.....Harry and Meghan are promoting the American birthed WOKE agenda for personal gain, and the rest of the world hates it. This is not good for Americas already massively declining reputation.
 
christiefan915 said:
They didn't want him. One of them considered him to be a stuffy prig.
Click to expand...

Yet Diana had a different view of her sister's relationship with her older sister Sarah.

In 1991, Diana recorded some thoughts for Andrew Morton, who wrote "Diana: Her True Story." The long-lost recordings were then transcribed by the Daily Mail and they definitely paint a different picture about Sarah and Charles' relationship than Sarah let on. "My sister Sarah was all over him like a bad rash, and I thought, 'God, he must really hate that,'" Diana said in the recording. Lady Di then went on to recall one of her earlier memories with Charles, in which he asked her to show him the art gallery after dinner. "And I was just about to show him the gallery and Sarah comes up and tells me to push off," the late princess explained.

In the recordings, Diana also recalled Charles' 30th birthday, and more specifically, some tension with Sarah over the fact that Diana was also invited to the party: "'Why is Diana coming as well?' my sister asked. I said: 'Well, I don't know, but I'd like to come.'"

Regardless of what went down between herself and Charles, Sarah was ultimately the person who introduced Charles and Diana (via The Sun) — and the rest, of course, was history.

Read More: https://www.nickiswift.com/475387/w...and-princess-dianas-sister/?utm_campaign=clip
 
Primavera said:
People welcomed her with open arms, but it soon became apparent that she wanted the trappings of wealth and the adulation without actually doing anything. Harry is too weak to say no to her sadly, still William is a good 'un who will make an excellent king as will Catherine an excellent queen. People in the UK just wish that Ginger and Whinger would shut the fuck up and just disappear.
Click to expand...

WTF do you care, ya former National Front windbag? Your flabby ass has been enjoying the exchange rate in Thailand for some time now (according to you). Hell, you spend a LOT of time giving lip service to the bigots and racists on an American discussion board, so it's no surprise that you'd bleat similar BS about Harry and Meaghan. Like I said before, you POS didn't say jack doodle when Prince Charles cheated on his wife, then married his HO and made her England's Lady in Waiting. But Harry calls out the Royals for their bigoted BS and said, '"Not with my wife you don't", and told them (and jokers like you) to kindly fuck off.

So you just keep parroting BS from a clown like Piers Morgan. It's about all you're good for.
 
Primavera said:
Here is just one, there are many more!!

New bombshell Netflix trailer wrongly suggests Meghan and Harry's 'security was pulled' BEFORE they left the Royal Family and claims 'everyone in the world knew where they were'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...sts-Meghan-Harrys-security-pulled-Megxit.html
Click to expand...

Tom Bower knows far more about them that just about anyone.

Royal expert slams Harry after latest Netflix claims that lies were told 'to protect William' saying Princess Diana would be 'appalled at his disloyalty' - as insiders dismiss jibe the Sussexes were victims of 'institutional gaslighting'

The Duke of Sussex's latest bitter broadside against the Royal Family came in a new trailer of his and his wife, Meghan's, incendiary Netflix tell-all.

And it sparked a vicious response on Monday evening, with one royal expert, Tom Bower saying Harry's 'treacherous collaboration' with the streaming giant had 'destroyed his relationship with William', as insiders dismiss jibes from the Sussexes that they were victims of 'institutional gaslighting'.

Mr Bower, who has authored multiple books about the royals, also rubbished suggestions the Duke and Duchess had their security withdrawn before Megxit, calling it 'shockingly untrue'.

And another royal author, Richard Fitzwilliams, has questioned whether the couple's claims about security had been 'sensationalised' by Netflix to draw in viewers.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ix-claims-says-Diana-appalled-disloyalty.html
 
Last edited:
Diesel said:
If neither of us has sources readily available, then I suppose it's rather a matter of subjective opinion, isn't it?
Click to expand...

Not really. There is material to read, official reports ( I linked one from the UN the other day). Also, I had the privilege of knowing for a few years Brits of various caste, class and ethnicity when I was in college and during my early job career in NYC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top