Is God punishing red states with severe weather and destructive tornadoes...

Gondwanaland said:
So yet again, you provide zero evidence for your bullshit. Again, how is storms with tornadoes in an area known for tornadoes for hundreds of years, 'climate change'
Click to expand...

They're stronger and more frequent. Just as climate change predicted. Stop asking stupid fucking questions.
 
Gondwanaland said:
So yet again, you provide zero evidence for your bullshit. Again, how is storms with tornadoes in an area known for tornadoes for hundreds of years, 'climate change'
Click to expand...

vAYmV0o.png
 
Gondwanaland said:
So you claim. With again zero evidence for your claim, fucktard.
Click to expand...

You're out of your fucking mind if you think I'm going to link 1000s of studies over decades for you. If you haven't been educated yet, you refuse to learn. Waste of my time.
 
AProudLefty said:
vAYmV0o.png
Click to expand...

And this is evidence of climate change.... how?

All you did was show that technology of our radar/doppler/etc have grown in their ability to detect tornadoes that would otherwise never be detected or known about (nighttime, middle of nowhere, ones that never touch down and if not seen would never be known of, etc.) over the past 70 years. Which is certainly the case.
 
Diesel said:
You're out of your fucking mind if you think I'm going to link 1000s of studies over decades for you. If you haven't been educated yet, you refuse to learn. Waste of my time.
Click to expand...

Ah, so now there are '1000s of studies' showing climate change has caused these tornadoes that are occurring in places where tornadoes have always fucking occurred? How convenient that you won't even link to one. Almost as if you're.... wait for it..... full of shit.
 
Gondwanaland said:
And this is evidence of climate change.... how?

All you did was show that technology of our radar/doppler/etc have grown in their ability to detect tornadoes that would otherwise never be detected or known about (nighttime, middle of nowhere, ones that never touch down and if not seen would never be known of, etc.) over the past 70 years. Which is certainly the case.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure the damages are evidence. :dunno:

Anyway, it shows the frequency over the years. Besides you just defeated your own argument because the technology was already available.
 
AProudLefty said:
Pretty sure the damages are evidence. :dunno:

Anyway, it shows the frequency over the years. Besides you just defeated your own argument because the technology was already available.
Click to expand...

Not really. Damages can be put down to the massive population increase (close to tripled in the US) since the 1950s and urban flight toward suburbs that sprawl miles around cities, which means more people have homes and thus more likelihood of tornadoes hitting and damaging property owned by humans instead of what was previously a field or a forest.

Not to mention tornado damages have DECREASED: https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/us-tornado-damage-1950-to-2021

But again, it doesn't actually show frequency over years, it shows frequency of those detected. Which has changed with the much better technology we have enabling detection of many tornadoes that would never have been detected in the 1950s.
 
Gondwanaland said:
Ah, so now there are '1000s of studies' showing climate change has caused these tornadoes that are occurring in places where tornadoes have always fucking occurred? How convenient that you won't even link to one. Almost as if you're.... wait for it..... full of shit.
Click to expand...

You're a piece of shit, but I'm sure you know that. Read all of these and stop acting like a petulant brat who refuses to believe your own eyes. You deplorables can't be helped.

https://www.google.com/search?ie=UT...e+storms+to+be+more+intense+and+more+frequent
 
Diesel said:
How many Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus do you know on JPP? That's your answer.
Click to expand...

I know of at least 2 Jews and 2 Buddhists to go along with at least 1 Muslim and Im pretty sure 1 Hindu. Dont you pay attention to anything in here? The 2 Jews are both Lefties, 1 Buddhist is an Indy and the other more of a righty, The Muslim is a lefty, and the possible Hindu is more of an Indy who thinks most politicians are criiks regardless of party.
 
Gondwanaland said:
Not really. Damages can be put down to the massive population increase (close to tripled in the US) since the 1950s and urban flight toward suburbs that sprawl miles around cities, which means more people have homes and thus more likelihood of tornadoes hitting and damaging property owned by humans instead of what was previously a field or a forest.

Not to mention tornado damages have DECREASED: https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/us-tornado-damage-1950-to-2021

But again, it doesn't actually show frequency over years, it shows frequency of those detected. Which has changed with the much better technology we have enabling detection of many tornadoes that would never have been detected in the 1950s.
Click to expand...

We'll need your links for that.
 
Stone said:
I know of at least 2 Jews and 2 Buddhists to go along with at least 1 Muslim and Im pretty sure 1 Hindu.
Click to expand...

Compared to the dozens of Christians, especially the ones who refer to their religion n every other post. Again, that's your answer.
 
Gondwanaland said:
Not really. Damages can be put down to the massive population increase (close to tripled in the US) since the 1950s and urban flight toward suburbs that sprawl miles around cities, which means more people have homes and thus more likelihood of tornadoes hitting and damaging property owned by humans instead of what was previously a field or a forest.

Not to mention tornado damages have DECREASED: https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/us-tornado-damage-1950-to-2021

But again, it doesn't actually show frequency over years, it shows frequency of those detected. Which has changed with the much better technology we have enabling detection of many tornadoes that would never have been detected in the 1950s.
Click to expand...

Are you telling me that NOAA forgot to mention that? That and adjusting the graph accordingly, based on statistics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top