Anyone who believes that CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS. NBC and NPR are not about disinformation is a mentally challenged halfwit. Russia collusion. The Covid HOAX. Fox is one of the few networks that even attempts to be sane or factual.
The reason you are a leftist mental case with a severely retarded IQ is that you think MSNBC is news. Moron.
there should be only 3 situations where abortion should be an available choice.
1. life of the mother at stake.
2. rape or incest
3. severe debilitation of the baby
other than that, nobody took away a choice. the man and woman made their choice in consensual sex that they KNEW could result in pregnancy
Abortion should never be used as birth control... and that's what it's become...
Abortion should never be used as birth control... and that's what it's become...
Why do you care if someone has an abortion?
despite most peoples perceptions that i'm a blood thirsty murderer waiting for an opportunity, I do have respect for life, especially lives where the life isn't given a choice or a chance.
I almost agree with you here. If only you had said there should be only 4 situations. The fourth which I would add would be:
If the person in who's body the pregnancy is happening just wants an abortion.
Then your list would make sense.
I get that 'most' people think that a majority should be able to rule over a minority, but that's not freedom, that's tyranny. Isn't tyranny what you're supposed to be against?Says who?
Most of America thinks it should be available for the 1st trimester, regardless.
and we call those calculated risks in a rational world.There are other circumstances where women are careful, and still get pregnant.
I'd say that those are extremely rare.........And there are many cases that they get pregnant against their will, but can't prove it in a court of law.
Unfortunately for disseminators of deceitful filth- such as yourself- Fox ' news ' confessed to being a fountain of lies for dumbasses. Drink up.
Haw, haw...........................................haw.
So your entire moral system is based on forcing women to give birth?
I get that 'most' people think that a majority should be able to rule over a minority, but that's not freedom, that's tyranny. Isn't tyranny what you're supposed to be against?
and we call those calculated risks in a rational world.
I'd say that those are extremely rare.........
I get that 'most' people think that a majority should be able to rule over a minority, but that's not freedom, that's tyranny. Isn't tyranny what you're supposed to be against?
my entire moral system is based on forcing everyone to be responsible. If that's being accountable for leaving your gun around where a kid can get it and cause injuries, or accepting the responsibility of birthing a child when you knew there was a risk of pregnancy, even after taking all precautions...........are you afraid of being responsible for your own actions?
how long have you been of the mindset that a woman is incapable of understanding the risks associated with consensual sex?It's actually tyranny to dial back history and take away a woman's right to choose - to FORCE a woman to carry a fetus to term, against her will.
and there's a simple solution for that......don't engage in sexual relationships if you're not capable of carrying to term. Much like don't get a fucking gun for protection if you're not ready to kill another person or animal.Birth control fails. Calculated risk or not - bringing an unwanted child into the world is not a remedy for that.
and i'm the first person to agree that that needs to be changed. If I had my way, most rapists would never make it to trial anyway, but i'm not an extreme vigilante........yet.Not extremely rare, at all. Most rape doesn't get prosecuted.
So are you suggesting that in order to avoid tyranny...a minority should be able to rule over a majority???
that is because you don't know what moral principles are. In consensual sex where pregnancy results, it's accepting the consequences for your actions, unless YOU are saying that woman don't know any better that sex can result in pregnancy. are you that much of a misogynist?I still do not see your moral principle. Is it anything more than forcing women to give birth?
that is because you don't know what moral principles are. In consensual sex where pregnancy results, it's accepting the consequences for your actions, unless YOU are saying that woman don't know any better that sex can result in pregnancy. are you that much of a misogynist?
So, you just want women to give birth. That is your only moral principle.