Trump not guilty of rape

Yeah, just sexual assault and defamation. It's all good.

Wait. In another thread you said it was a rape trial. So... Seems like with that kind of nonsense being repeated by an honest to gawd attorney from the Great State of FloridaMan, it seems that you should be saying he was acquitted of that "charge" in this "rape trial".
 
Wait. In another thread you said it was a rape trial. So... Seems like with that kind of nonsense being repeated by an honest to gawd attorney from the Great State of FloridaMan, it seems that he was acquitted of that "charge" in this "rape trial".

If you want to defend your hero with semantics, be my guest. I hope and pray you all decide he's the perfect candidate to represent Republican values.

P.S. I am not a lawyer, and I did not refer to the trial as a rape trial. Probably Jarod, but I don't want to speak for someone else. Here is the bottom line. Trump was found by a jury of his peers to have committed sexual assault and then lied about it. If you want to defend him because the rape allegation wasn't proven with a preponderance of evidence, you go for that. It's like defending a serial killer because he was found not guilty on one of his alleged murders. Please, proceed.
 
I remember how Republicans used to be - total outrage when Clinton had a consensual affair. "Not fit for office."

Republicans in 2023? Hey, it's only sexual battery. When do we vote?
 
Trump is guilty of digital penetration, it’s just too bad that some states definition hasn’t caught up with the FBI’s

[FONT=&quot]The revised UCR definition of rape is: Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.
[/FONT]

RtsoPQAAAAASUVORK5CYII=

https://ucr.fbi.gov › violent-crime

[h=3]FBI — Rape[/h]




 
If you want to defend your hero with semantics, be my guest. I hope and pray you all decide he's the perfect candidate to represent Republican values.

P.S. I am not a lawyer, and I did not refer to the trial as a rape trial. Probably Jarod, but I don't want to speak for someone else. Here is the bottom line. Trump was found by a jury of his peers to have committed sexual assault and then lied about it. If you want to defend him because the rape allegation wasn't proven with a preponderance of evidence, you go for that. It's like defending a serial killer because he was found not guilty on one of his alleged murders. Please, proceed.
Juries like to see DNA evidence for rape. trump withheld his DNA for years, so the judge did not allow any discussion of same during trial. In the 11th hour he offered to supply his DNA, knowing it was just another stalling tactic.


This trial was about monetary gain, so it doesn't matter what the jury thought about rape. They know he's a serial sexual assaulter, so the defamation case stood. He had no grounds to make the claims he did about his victim.
 
Wait. In another thread you said it was a rape trial. So... Seems like with that kind of nonsense being repeated by an honest to gawd attorney from the Great State of FloridaMan, it seems that you should be saying he was acquitted of that "charge" in this "rape trial".

He was acquitted of nothing. Found guilty. So you dismiss sexual abuse when Trump does it.
 
Wait. In another thread you said it was a rape trial. So... Seems like with that kind of nonsense being repeated by an honest to gawd attorney from the Great State of FloridaMan, it seems that you should be saying he was acquitted of that "charge" in this "rape trial".

This was a civil trial.

There is no guilt or innocence or acquittal.

Trump was found liable to the tune of $5 million.

Ha ha.
 
:laugh:


Not rape.... innocent

Sexual abuse is sexual behavior or a sexual act forced upon a woman, man or child without their consent.
Sexual abuse is an act of violence which the attacker uses against someone they perceive as weaker than them.

Thats innocent to you?
 
Back
Top