How Long Will Waterhead Believe in Global Warming?

Waterhead will believe in Global Warming...

  • Until Al Gore admits he was misled.

    Votes: 2 14.3%

  • Until Obama drops it from his political agenda completely.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Until the day he dies!

    Votes: 4 28.6%

  • Until it is socially uncool and un-Grind-like to believe it!

    Votes: 8 57.1%
  • Total voters
    14
My guess is as long as you believe that Iraq was a stunning spectacular success.
 
30ae1af.jpg
 
Mott the Hoople said:
I think that it's pretty pathetic that an emo trollish retard like Watermark has vastly more credibility on any scientific topic then you do Dixie.
Click to expand...

I wish I could give you rep for this.

That said, I answered until it wasn't 'cool'. Stupid puns aside (don't say any), Watermark is actually pretty smart and I figure that once he no longer has people trying to dick slap him over global warming, he'll wake up and understand the failure of many of his positions.

And Watermark, I know you'll read this. Everything about you right now, is trendy. The 'socialism', the 'anti religion', everything that you present of yourself on here 99% of the time is trendy. Just so ya know.
 
There is more evidence that GW is real than evidence that it is not.

That is how science works guys.
 
There is still more evidence that it exsists then there is evidence that it doesnt.

When the balence of the evidence points in one direction then you can understand why the majority of scientists believe it exsists.

When there are monied interests who are hell bent on suppressing the evidence you will find certain scientists who will try anything (say stealing personal emails and writing bags of shit and submitting them as scientific papers) to get some money from them.

It kinda makes real scientists mad and they would like to see them lose their finacial backing.

Follow the money
 
evince said:
There is more evidence that GW is real than evidence that it is not.

That is how science works guys.
Click to expand...

That's so fucking stupid.

Of course the planet warms.
Now as for proof that human contributions to CO2 concentration caused the warming? LOL if there was proof, there would be no debate!!
 
evince said:
There is still more evidence that it exsists then there is evidence that it doesnt.

When the balence of the evidence points in one direction then you can understand why the majority of scientists believe it exsists.

When there are monied interests who are hell bent on suppressing the evidence you will find certain scientists who will try anything (say stealing personal emails and writing bags of shit and submitting them as scientific papers) to get some money from them.

It kinda makes real scientists mad and they would like to see them lose their finacial backing.

Follow the money
Click to expand...

they cooked to books so the "science" would make their case.
But the science is failing
 
Do you mean AGW?

And wow, do I love Beefy's response. The greatest military achievement of our generation!

Really Dix, you're not one to point fingers about willfully blind partisan beliefs...
 
CaptBillyTheKid said:
I wish I could give you rep for this.

That said, I answered until it wasn't 'cool'. Stupid puns aside (don't say any), Watermark is actually pretty smart and I figure that once he no longer has people trying to dick slap him over global warming, he'll wake up and understand the failure of many of his positions.

And Watermark, I know you'll read this. Everything about you right now, is trendy. The 'socialism', the 'anti religion', everything that you present of yourself on here 99% of the time is trendy. Just so ya know.
Click to expand...

It's not trendy. My beliefs are practically the opposite of every trend of the day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top