Should have done Lobster or Crab - "USDA Approves First Lab-Grown Chicken"

Bigdog

Bigdog

Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
"USDA Approves First Lab-Grown Chicken in the United States
Two companies have received the green light to produce and sell chicken they have cultivated from cells"

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...grown-chicken-in-the-united-states-180982417/

Why would you do this with chicken instead of Lobster? I might even try the lobster.

I doubt they could do oysters, but I'm sure the could do human meat with no lives lost.
 
Last edited:
I think it is inevitable that lab grown (cloned) meat will eventually replace farmed meat as the main source of consumed meat once they perfect it and can mass produce at scale. Star Trek replicator FTW.

And it is much more appealing, imo, to simulated meat made from veggies, as the veggies farmed still put immense pressure on the planet and the texture and taste will be more true.

Republiclowns will fight against it, but this is a good advnacement.
 
QP! said:
I think it is inevitable that lab grown (cloned) meat will eventually replace farmed meat as the main source of consumed meat once they perfect it and can mass produce at scale. Star Trek replicator FTW.

And it is much more appealing, imo, to simulated meat made from veggies, as the veggies farmed still put immense pressure on the planet and the texture and taste will be more true.

Republiclowns will fight against it, but this is a good advnacement.
Click to expand...

Why would we fight against it?
 
Tinkerpeach said:
Why would we fight against it?
Click to expand...

Because it is what Republiclowns do.

They see all technology advancement as a bad thing and instantly protest that the "dems are trying to make our gas mileage better in ICE vehicles' or other such complaints.
 
QP! said:
Because it is what Republiclowns do.

They see all technology advancement as a bad thing and instantly protest that the "dems are trying to make our gas mileage better in ICE vehicles' or other such complaints.
Click to expand...

We are not against technology at all

We are against stupid technology
 
Tinkerpeach said:
We are not against technology at all

We are against stupid technology
Click to expand...

The conservaclown movement is by its very definition about turning back the clock, to make America great again by taking everything back to the glorious time pre technology. That is why the republiclowns on the SC are pushing forth this stupid theory that all things need to be judged via what was intended at the time of the Constitutions writing. A time when only white men had any say, women and PoC had no rights and no input.

An asinine way to adjudicate anything.
 
QP! said:
The conservaclown movement is by its very definition about turning back the clock, to make America great again by taking everything back to the glorious time pre technology. That is why the republiclowns on the SC are pushing forth this stupid theory that all things need to be judged via what was intended at the time of the Constitutions writing. A time when only white men had any say, women and PoC had no rights and no input.

An asinine way to adjudicate anything.
Click to expand...

That is a bunch of crap. It is the Libs like Pol Pot and all the Dems who falsely claim they are living a Native American lifestyle in tune with nature that oppose technology.
 
QP! said:
The conservaclown movement is by its very definition about turning back the clock, to make America great again by taking everything back to the glorious time pre technology. That is why the republiclowns on the SC are pushing forth this stupid theory that all things need to be judged via what was intended at the time of the Constitutions writing. A time when only white men had any say, women and PoC had no rights and no input.

An asinine way to adjudicate anything.
Click to expand...

If Germany is any sort of indication, being a leader in the Green Revolution, it is the radical Left doing that near 100%.

After all, Germany got rid of nuclear power, and because solar and wind can't provide reliable power they reverted to coal plants to make the difference. Then they started banning natural gas so people were forced to heat their homes there with wood. Now there's a wood shortage and many forested areas of Germany are threatened as people seek wood to burn.

Why firewood is suddenly in high demand in Germany
Welcome to Europe under an energy crisis.
https://www.vox.com/world/2022/10/17/23390663/europe-energy-crisis-explained-firewood-germany

If anything, the Left is a bunch of Luddites and anti-technology haters.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
We are not against technology at all

We are against stupid technology
Click to expand...

You mean any technology that benefits the environment and humanity.

The only kinds of technology the right is in support of, is technology that makes guns able to kill more people and/or animals, technology that makes military weapons more deadly and destructive, and technology that makes cars and trucks bigger, louder, go faster and consume more petroleum based fossil fuel.

Etc, etc.
 
Bigdog said:
...
Click to expand...

T. A. Gardner said:
...
Click to expand...

Nomad said:
You mean any technology that benefits the environment and humanity.

The only kinds of technology the right is in support of, is technology that makes guns able to kill more people and/or animals, technology that makes military weapons more deadly and destructive, and technology that makes cars and trucks bigger, louder, go faster and consume more petroleum based fossil fuel.

Etc, etc.
Click to expand...

Yup.

Maga conservatards would fight against the Catalytic converter, if invented today as 'woke'.

The were up in arms AGAINST auto makers agreeing to joint efforts to increase fuel efficiency and cut pollution.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1169998906580582405


You got that right. It was 'woke' to save them money and cut pollution for their kids and the future.
 
Nomad said:
You mean any technology that benefits the environment and humanity.

The only kinds of technology the right is in support of, is technology that makes guns able to kill more people and/or animals, technology that makes military weapons more deadly and destructive, and technology that makes cars and trucks bigger, louder, go faster and consume more petroleum based fossil fuel.

Etc, etc.
Click to expand...

Then why is the Greentard, radical-Leftist movement trying to ban anhydrous ammonia as a fertilizer while at the same time trying to ban raising livestock when they are calling for increased use of manure as an inferior substitute?
 
QP! said:
Yup.

Maga conservatards would fight against the Catalytic converter, if invented today as 'woke'.

The were up in arms AGAINST auto makers agreeing to joint efforts to increase fuel efficiency and cut pollution.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1169998906580582405


You got that right. It was 'woke' to save them money and cut pollution for their kids and the future.
Click to expand...

I'm not against reasonable pollution controls at all. What I'm against, and you are apparently for is forcing society into a zero pollution scenario. That is an utterly absurd, irrational, and even insane position.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I'm not against reasonable pollution controls at all. What I'm against, and you are apparently for is forcing society into a zero pollution scenario. That is an utterly absurd, irrational, and even insane position.
Click to expand...

what you are for is ridiculous strawmen and just making shit up.

There is no talk of zero pollution here. This is simply about improvements, similar to what automakers have made the last few decades. The automakers understand that is good for business, beyond what it is for the environment or peoples pocket books.

And what did Republi'cans' do?

They cried foul that when the Trump admin said 'we want improvements A,B,C' and the car companies said 'Ok, we will don A,B, C and D,'.

COnservatards got upset that they went BEYOND what the gov't asked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top