Supreme Court rules businesses can refuse service to LGBTQ+ customers

[Concart]

The next case the Supreme Court will be ruling on is Harry Potter, Plaintiff v. Lord Voldermort, Defendant.

 

[Into the Night]

it's a document and does not speak tardo

The Constitution of the United States speaks for itself, moron. It is it's own authoritative reference. Semantics fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

moron with his fallacies fallacy

Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

"Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884),[SUP][1][/SUP] was a landmark case[SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][3][/SUP] decided by the United States Supreme Court that allowed state governments, as distinguished from the federal government, to avoid using grand juries in criminal prosecutions."

The court probably declined to hear the Idaho case because it was already settled in Hurtado and they did not choose to revisit the issue. The court is often reluctant to issue decisions that will make major changes in state criminal law systems.

The Supreme Court has no authority to change any constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. I'm talking about the actual law as determined by Supreme Court cases and not your opinion of the Constitution.

The 2nd did not apply to the states until McDonald v. Chicago in 2010.

Since the states have not quartered troops in homes there has never been a case to make it applicable. There was almost a case when a state put troops in the barracks of prison guards in order to put down a riot, but a settlement was reached before it climbed the courts.

The Supreme Court is NOT the Constitution of the United States.
The 2nd amendment has ALWAYS applied to both the federal government AND the States.

The 2nd amendment is not about quartering troops.

 

[Into the Night]

Your opinion

The Constitution of the United States is NOT my opinion, dumbass; but I do support it.

is in direct conflict with actual law,

The Constitution of the United States IS the law.

court decisions,

No court has authority to change any constitution.

and constitutional history.

Strawman fallacy. The Constitution is what it is. History is of no consequence.

Parts of the 5th amendment were made applicable to the states.

The 5th amendment has ALWAYS applied to both the federal government and the States.

The self-incrimination clause of the 5th was made applicable to the states in (1964) and double-jeopardy in 1969 but in 1883 the court ruled grand jury indictments are not required by the states.

WRONG!!! The 5th amendment has ALWAYS applied to the States.

In 1833 in Barron v. Baltimore the court ruled the Bill of Rights did not extend to the states.

The court has NO authority to change the Constitution. This decision was unconstitutional.

This was constitutional law

No court is the Constitution.

until N.Y. v. Gitlow in 1925 which began the incorporation process.

There was no 'incorporation process'.

The Supreme Court just modified the meaning of the Constitution

The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution. They MUST conform with it in any decision they make, or the decision is unconstitutional.

last week in the cases involving affirmative action, free speech/religion......

The rulings last week conforms with the Constitution of the United States. They are the correct (and the only) constitutional decision possible.

The Supreme Court cannot change the meaning of any part of the constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

The next case the Supreme Court will be ruling on is Harry Potter, Plaintiff v. Lord Voldermort, Defendant.

 

[zymurgy]

Inversion fallacy.

moron with his fallacies fallacy

 

[zymurgy]

The Constitution of the United States speaks for itself, moron. It is it's own authoritative reference. Semantics fallacy.

a document can't speak moron

 

[Earl]

a document can't speak moron

When the Constitution is read, it speaks to the reader.

Is this the best you have?

Good grief.

 

[zymurgy]

When the Constitution is read, it speaks to the reader.

Is this the best you have?

Good grief.

troll boy doesn't get "the best I have"

he is a fucking dipshit. He gets contempt

his fallacy nonsense is horse shit, as his his shit stained mind

 

[Flash]

The Supreme Court has no authority to change any constitution.

They did not "change" it. They just clearly ruled what the Bill of Rights explicitly says and intended (in Hurtado).

They changed the meaning of the Constitution when they struck down affirmative action, laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual preference when it involves artistic expression, legislative supremacy over election laws, and the president's power to forgive student loans.

 

[Flash]

The Supreme Court is NOT the Constitution of the United States.
The 2nd amendment has ALWAYS applied to both the federal government AND the States.

And yet, the Supreme Court rather than Into the Night determines what the law is and has been interpreting the Constitution for 230+ years.

 

[Flash]

The rulings last week conforms with the Constitution of the United States. They are the correct (and the only) constitutional decision possible.

The Supreme Court cannot change the meaning of any part of the constitution.

The previous decisions on these issues were wrong?

 

[Into the Night]

a document can't speak moron

The Constitution of the United States speaks for itself, moron. It is it's own authoritative reference. Semantics fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

troll boy doesn't get "the best I have"

he is a fucking dipshit. He gets contempt

his fallacy nonsense is horse shit, as his his shit stained mind

Bulverism fallacy. Inversion fallacy. Insult fallacies. No argument presented. Grow up.

 

[Lightbringer]

The previous decisions on these issues were wrong?

Yes, because if they aren't then you have no leg to stand on.

 

[Into the Night]

They did not "change" it. They just clearly ruled what the Bill of Rights explicitly says and intended (in Hurtado).

They do not have authority to rule what the Bill of Rights says. See Article III for what authority the Supreme Court DOES have.

They changed the meaning of the Constitution when they struck down affirmative action,

They did not change the meaning at all. They simply finally conformed to what the Constitution has always said.

laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual preference when it involves artistic expression,

They did not change the meaning at all. They simply finally conformed to what the Constitution has always said.

legislative supremacy over election laws,

The did not change the meaning at all. They simply finally conformed to what the Constitution has always said.

and the president's power to forgive student loans.

The did not change the meaning at all. The simply finally conformed to what the Constitution has always said.

The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution, or 'change the meaning' of any part of the Constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

And yet, the Supreme Court rather than Into the Night determines what the law is and has been interpreting the Constitution for 230+ years.

The Supreme Court does NOT determine what the law is. Congress does that. Only Congress can do that (for the federal layer). The Supreme Court has no authority to interpret or change the Constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

The previous decisions on these issues were wrong?

ANY decision by the Supreme Court that is not in compliance with the Constitution of the United States is unconstitutional. It is wrong.

The Supreme Court operates UNDER the authority of the Constitution. They have NO power over it.