Supreme Court rules businesses can refuse service to LGBTQ+ customers

[Into the Night]

You know the only people who have ever said a word about my sex life on this site are repressed men who outwardly identify as straight but are not. It's tedious listening to you closet cases.

Another wacky 'conspiracy' statement.

You're fucked up, dude.

 

[Into the Night]

Hindsight is a miracle. No one thought Trump could win. Given the indescribable fuckery that Trump unleashed on the world, I would take 10 Hillary terms. But she was a product of a broken political system. She didn't give us Trump. The DNC did.

The Democrat National Committee is not authorized to certify any election of a President.

 

[Into the Night]

No, it is not "irrelevant". I still don't understand how the woman got standing. She was never harmed and the "point of fact" is that the man she claims asked for a website never did. The entire case is bullshit, but the Republican appointees on the Court are utterly corrupt.

She doesn't need to be harmed. A case can be filed strictly on constitutional grounds alone.

 

[Into the Night]

No one said anything about changing the Constitution. The legally ratified 14th Amendment is what changed the Constitution. The courts are interpreting the Amendment to apply them to actual cases of law.

The 14th amendment didn't change or repeal any other amendment.
No court has authority to interpret the Constitution or change it in any way.

 

[Into the Night]

The State of Colorado never attempted to fight her standing.

They wouldn't succeed if they tried. She lives in Colorado. The law is unconstitutional. She has standing.

 

[Into the Night]

you sound like a nutjob

Considering his perverse habits that he endorses, beliefs in wacky conspiracy theories, and his constant attempt to project his own problems on others, you are right.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, it did.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/03/us/politics/same-sex-marriage-document-supreme-court.html

False authority fallacy. Fake News.

 

[Into the Night]

Bitch, please. I have been a minority -- in more ways than one -- for my entire life.

That is correct. You are one person. The majority is everyone else.

Have you ever been to another state?

Myself? Yes. I have actually been to every single State in the Union and several territories. Why is this important to you?

Left the country?

Myself? Yes. I have been to several countries. Why is this important to you?

Lived abroad for an extended period of time?

No. Why is this important to you?

The only people who end up with fucked up opinions like yours are white, "straight" people who have the incomprehensible and annoying bad habit of telling everyone else how they're allowed to feel.

The basic purpose of sex is to have children. Sexual perversions do not result in reproduction. It CAN ruin your health!
This isn't about 'feel'. This is about your sexual perversions being passed off as 'normal'.

You're a whiny, bitchy princess who lives endlessly in the privilege you never earned.

What 'privilege'??? Void argument fallacy.

I put "straight" in quotes because I'm sure that you're not.

You don't get to speak for anyone but you. Omniscience fallacy.

Post some more about fisting, you self-hating closet case.

He is not you. Pointing out your desire for sexually perversive activity is not hate.

The only showing hate here is YOU.

 

[Into the Night]

Now you're flailing. Queer mental disease? The case is over. You're missing the bigger picture because you're not a smart person. This Court is intentionally, directly dismantling decades of civil rights progress. It is openly attacking minorities, including women, LGBTQ individuals, and racial minorities. This Court is dangerous, regressive, and is going to do as much damage as it can.

The court has attacked no one. Paranoia.
Perverse sexual behavior is not a 'Civil Right'. It is not a genetic trait either.

Conforming to the Constitution of the United States is NOT 'dangerous', or 'regressive'', or 'damage'.

 

[Into the Night]

My bad. I didn't know you're poor. And also unable to Google.

Lawrence Pacheco, a spokesman for Phil Weiser, the state’s attorney general, said Colorado’s brief had noted that the request was problematic. “We raised the fact it was not a real request,” he said.

In an interview last year, Mr. Weiser focused on what he said was the larger question in the case: a lack of a meaningful record.

Assuming what you describe to have actually happened (personally I think you are resorting to making shit up now), the State of Colorado will lose any claim of 'lack of standing' instantly.
She lives in Colorado. She is affected by this unconstitutional Colorado law. She has standing.

 

[Into the Night]

That is the dumbest fucking thing that could ever be said about discrimination. So dumb that only a white person -- or Clarence Thomas -- could say it.

He didn't say anything about discrimination. Hallucination.

 

[Into the Night]

The New York Times is more factual than the National Review.

Learn what 'fact' means. It does NOT mean 'Universal Truth'.

It is as left-leaning as the National Review is right-leaning.

Bulverism fallacy.

Your brain has been rotted by your echo chamber and your political hatred.

Inversion fallacy. You are just describing yourself again.

Projecting YOUR OWN problems on others will get you nowhere.

 

[Diesel]

Would someone please remind that autistic sociopath Into the Night that he's been on ignore for a long time? He can obsessively ankle bite about made up fallacies to someone else.

 

[Nomad]

Huh. You were doing a better job of hiding exactly how homophobic you are until that meltdown. I get it now. You don't give a shit about the phony web designer or the case or the 1st Amendment. You just hate "fags".

No, you've got it bass-ackwards like you've got everything else.

I don't hate fags, I just don't give a shit about them or their PHONY complaints about the non-existent "discrimination" and "inequality" they supposedly suffer from.

Certainly not anywhere near as much as I do give a shit about the freedom of the web designer and all other creators to be able to decline to produce messages they are morally opposed to.

I wouldn't have even begun referring to them as "fags" if they hadn't become so demanding, obnoxious, pushy and in your face as they have over the past few years.

Honestly, I mainly I just call them that to offend you.

And though, as I said, I don't hate them, I will say I have more negative feelings towards them than I used to because of their Gay Nazi Mafia tactics.

How do you feel about niggers....

Depends.

Do you differentiate between "niggers" and "black people"?

I do.

I bet you don't though.

I respect and value black people who live within the law.

I bet you "love" (in both the emotional and physical sense) everybody of African descent with black skin, even if they are the vilest, dirtiest, violent criminal ghetto gang-banger thugs that stalk the streets of America.

I don't give a shit about what happens to violent criminals or thugs of any color at the hands of the police or whatever.

I bet you make no distinction, and in your jizz-addled brain, you think they're all innocent victims of de white man.

That is just how mentally fucked up you come across as.

you old, crazy, washed up pile of shit?

Funny you'd call me that considering the anatomical orifice you employ for your sick, pervy sexual gratification.

You washed up, sexually confused turd fucker.

 

[Diesel]

No, you've got it bass-ackwards like you've got everything else.

I don't hate fags, I just don't give a shit about them or their PHONY complaints about the non-existent "discrimination" and "inequality" they supposedly suffer from.

Certainly not anywhere near as much as I do give a shit about the freedom of the web designer and all other creators to be able to decline to produce messages they are morally opposed to.

I wouldn't have even begun referring to them as "fags" if they hadn't become so demanding, obnoxious, pushy and in your face as they have over the past few years.

Honestly, I mainly I just call them that to offend you.

And though, as I said, I don't hate them, I will say I have more negative feelings towards them than I used to because of their Gay Nazi Mafia tactics.



Depends.

Do you differentiate between "niggers" and "black people"?

I do.

I bet you don't though.

I respect and value black people who live within the law.

I bet you "love" (in both the emotional and physical sense) everybody of African descent with black skin, even if they are the vilest, dirtiest, violent criminal ghetto gang-banger thugs that stalk the streets of America.

I don't give a shit about what happens to violent criminals or thugs of any color at the hands of the police or whatever.

I bet you make no distinction, and in your jizz-addled brain, you think they're all innocent victims of de white man.

That is just how mentally fucked up you come across as.



Funny you'd call me that considering the anatomical orifice you employ for your sick, pervy sexual gratification.

You washed up, sexually confused turd fucker.

How many times in your life have you told a minority to their face that they don't experience discrimination after they just told you that they experience discrimination? Honestly. How did that go?

That's the problem with you dying crackers. You're not content to just hate us, call us names, and actively work to deny us our civil rights, but you won't even let us have our own emotions. What kind of shriveled up, privileged motherfucker tells a stranger that they perceive their own life wrong? You are literally a shit person.

And just as I expected, you're also a seething racist. Didn't you used to parade around here like you were liberal or leaned liberal? You're nothing but a cranky, racist, homophobic, wrinkly asshole who is bitter that the world left you behind. You're a conservative and a hateful bitch.

For the record, all criminals deserve to face the full consequences of the law, buy no criminals are "niggers". I don't have to make that distinction because I don't use the word unless I'm talking to someone like you. We all know why you use it.

 

[Into the Night]

This Supreme Court is a broken activist court and deliberately so, via the Federalist Society plan.

Conforming to the Constitution of the United States is not 'a broken activist court'.

This SC is put in place to reverse much of the past 100 years of progress and MAGA by returning us to times when what white men thought was all that can and should be considered. They are not hiding that and admit when they say they are now reading the Constitution with the original intent of the Framers and deciding cases based on that.

Discarding the Constitution is not 'progress'.
Racism.
Omniscience fallacy. You don't get to speak for the dead.

Understand that their position is that what a bunch of old white men, in a time when PoC were property and women had the rights of children only, input into their views of the law is now what they are saying will be the guide posts they use to judge all issues.

Apparently you are completely unfamiliar with the Constitution of the United States.

That is why you now see courts ruling that 'men guilty of spousal abuse cannot be denied guns anymore'

Are they in prison? No? Then they can have a gun. The right of self defense is inherent, dude. The 2nd amendment cannot be set aside because someone's pissed off.

and they reviersed saying 'that was not contemplated as a reason to deny a person a gun by the framers'.

No can speak for the dead. The Constitution is what it is. It speaks for itself. It is the ONLY authoritative reference of itself.

Again at a time when women had very few rights.

Women have always had rights. Go read the Constitution. Some of those rights are discussed in there.

Clarence Thomas has made it clear too SOLICITING cases to be brought to the SC for them to reverse. No proper SC solicites cases eager to end prior precedent. They are arbiters of the cases in the system and not advocated of what needs to be brought to courts.

Irrelevant.

They have also made a mockery of 'standing' and 'Stare decisis' , which were two foundational elements of prior SC.

Irrelevant.

They granted status for the States to sue over Student loan forgiveness despite them demonstrating no justified standing.

The live in the States. They pay taxes. They have standing.

They granted status to this women who was concerned that maybe, one day, kind of sorta, she MIGHT want to sell web sites and she MIGHT end up sued and they did so with a fake person on the other end.

She lives in Colorado. The unconstitutional law affects her business. She has standing.

None of any of this matters

Yes it does. It is why you are whining, ya commie POS.

if there is a case they want to hear so they can overturn it.

Overturn a case not heard yet?????!? HUH????????!??

The good news is that if Joe Biden does stack the court,

He has no authority to.

as he should with a big win in 2024,

Considering he never won in 2020 in the first place, why do you expect a 'big win'?? Are you Democrats planning on election fraud again? (I already know. The question is rhetorical.)

then the same republicans certainly will not cry about 'standing' or 'stare decisis' if that new court goes about changing, for the better, the entire recent history of the court and even much of the past.

There is no reason to support an unconstitutional decision by the court that took place in the past.

This SC has turned into a completely political body that will just look to implement partisan positions depending on who has power at the time.

...annnnnnd this is where we are:
The Democrats (and you) look upon conforming with the Constitution as a 'partisan position', which is just another way of openly admitting that Democrats deny and discard the Constitution of the United States (and all State constitutions).
Conservatives (and most Americans) want to see the Constitution restored, and they support any effort in that direction, including a Supreme Court that conforms to the Constitution (for once!).

This nation is headed toward civil war.

 

[Into the Night]

I don't care what you think. I don't care what fake xtians who have bastardized Christ's message beyond comprehension think. There will always be stupid, hateful people; and my goal is not to help any of you deplorables evolve.

I do care about the way government makes decisions about how people interact with each other. I care when government sanctions discrimination by "religious" people against LGBTQ people. I care when government forces women to carry pregnancies they don't want. I care when government says that two consenting adults are not allowed to get married or have whatever sex they want to have with each other in private. The fact that people go to court for permission to be shitty people to fellow citizens -- and the even more unbelievable fact that there are courts that will grant it -- means that whatever advancements we've made in the past 60 years are fragile and can be reversed in a moment.

Sexual perversion is not an 'advancement' or 'progress'. It, itself, has become a religion.
Sexual perversion is not sex.

Bullshit like 'Pride Month' and parades display lewd behavior violates law. Here in Washington, for example, such a parade carries the penalty of a class C felony for both the parade participants, and for the organizers. It is AGAINST THE LAW in Washington.

Seattle has no problem with VIOLATING STATE LAW to hold such parades.

How typical of Democrats.

 

[Into the Night]

I'm not gay, but you are a flaming moron. How would you know that the Times is a "shit stained piece of trash" if you don't read it? Oh, someone told you to think that. I promise I'm surprised. As I pointed out, the National Review is just as biased and less factual. You prefer it because you agree with it. That's called confirmation bias and explains why you understand about 1% of the world.

That applies to the fact that you didn't know Colorado argued standing. Then you wouldn't look at the information when I spoon fed it to you. Then you wouldn't do your own research either. You are a lazy liar and the problem with the world. You think you're entitled to opinions, but your opinions are fact-free and printed onto your shriveled brain by monied interests that own you.

Fallacy fallacies. Repetition fallacy. The web designer has standing.

 

[Into the Night]

This is a court you would find in Nazi Germany, selected by Hitler himself. You want hate and fake Christianity , well that is simple in 2023 vote Red. None of them are good for this great country. That is unless they reject Trump ,jan6th and being hate based in all actions and decisions. There is no democracy if the right wins the presidency. They have already choice dictatorship over democracy to stay in power. The right has chosen a demographic of our country that will never lose a election. The stupid and hate driven. That is when education is controlled by the hate party anywhere in this country while they make sure their voters are as stupid as possible, by lack of education and lies. You want to erase the chance of a hate party being able to take power in this country, Nothing to it, simply educate the population to the best of our ability. Out law the book burners that have moved into school boards across the nation. There has never been a uglier group controlling the direction of the education in this country.

The hate post is YOURS. You hate the Constitution. You hate the people of America. You hate Christians. The United States was never a democracy. Conforming to the Constitution is not dictatorship.

The Nazis were socialists. That's like DEMOCRATS, dumbass.

 

[Into the Night]

The Federalist Society's plan has never been a secret. They are implementing what they were created to do. "Elections have consequences," as they say. The Democrats better win some if we don't want to be returned to a third world 17th-century shit hole.

Have you seen San Francisco or Los Angeles or Minneapolis or New York City lately? They ARE shit holes! DEMOCRATS made them that way!