Fact check throws cold water on global ‘boiling’ claims

Grokmaster

Well-known member
Contributor
More completely false/manipulated data from the lying-ass Climatistas/Warmists.

What a shocker...like ALL LEFTISTS, from BLM on, if the facts don't fit the preferred narrative...JUST LIE.




Fact check throws cold water on global ‘boiling’ claims


July was hot — no doubt about it. And media reporting on the heat wave was a raging wildfire of global warming hype.

But was it the worst-ever July scorcher, as the Washington Post, the Associated Press, USA Today, and others reported?

According to a group of fact-checkers who dug through the reports, the weather didn’t live up to the hype.

In fact, the July “Media Climate Fact Check” turned around a Washington Post claim about July being the hottest in 125,000 years, headlining the report, “Worst Media Coverage In 125,000 Years.”

In picking apart specific media stories about the heat, the report provided to Secrets acknowledged the unusual heat wave. But it also cited two anomalies that skewed the data: the impact of El Nino and a two-day spike in Antarctica’s temperature that helped raise the so-called “global temperature.”

What’s more, it noted that since U.S. satellite data on global temperatures have only been collected since 1979, it is impossible to compare temperatures from 100 years ago — or 125,000.

“That heat wave was only detected and factored into average global temperature because of satellite coverage of the globe. But satellite coverage didn’t begin until 1979. So similar heat waves that may have occurred before 1979 would be unknown and not factored into average global temperature calculations,” read the report.


July was hot — no doubt about it. And media reporting on the heat wave was a raging wildfire of global warming hype.

But was it the worst-ever July scorcher, as the Washington Post, the Associated Press, USA Today, and others reported?



According to a group of fact-checkers who dug through the reports, the weather didn’t live up to the hype.

In fact, the July “Media Climate Fact Check” turned around a Washington Post claim about July being the hottest in 125,000 years, headlining the report, “Worst Media Coverage In 125,000 Years.”

In picking apart specific media stories about the heat, the report provided to Secrets acknowledged the unusual heat wave. But it also cited two anomalies that skewed the data: the impact of El Nino and a two-day spike in Antarctica’s temperature that helped raise the so-called “global temperature.”

What’s more, it noted that since U.S. satellite data on global temperatures have only been collected since 1979, it is impossible to compare temperatures from 100 years ago — or 125,000.

“That heat wave was only detected and factored into average global temperature because of satellite coverage of the globe. But satellite coverage didn’t begin until 1979. So similar heat waves that may have occurred before 1979 would be unknown and not factored into average global temperature calculations,” read the report.


“So it is not possible to claim that July 2023 was the ‘hottest month in the history of civilization’ because such data does not exist,” read the analysis from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Heartland Institute, the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, the International Climate Science Coalition, and Truth in Energy and Climate.

Those organizations have long urged the media to tap the brakes on the climate change hype, but news outlets have stomped the accelerator instead in recent years.

What their report aims to do is counter the most outrageous reports with simple facts. The July report cited 10 media claims.

~ The AP reported that the ocean off Florida’s southern tip was like a “hot tub” and the “hottest seawater ever measured.” The fact-checkers, however, noted that the example wasn’t of the open ocean but a very shallow bay and not even a record high.

And USA Today reported that the extreme heat was a top killer. “Every year since 2000, an average of 20,000 people have died from extreme heat in European cities,” the outlet reported, citing a scientific paper. The fact check mocked that story, noting that cold kills far more than heat.




https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/t...p&cvid=c2ec237204a742608d51f4b8020f8160&ei=13




2jopi9.jpg
 
NOAA has updated its U.S. Contiguous USCRN Average Temperature Anomaly Data through July 2023 as shown below.

attachment.php

The measured data shows no supporting upward trends regarding U.S. 2023 average summer temperature anomalies to date. This reality flies in the face of the out-of-control media climate alarmist incompetent and idiotically hyped “tipping point” climate change temperature propaganda this summer as illustrated by these prior WUWT articles exposing this purely bogus garbage.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/08...aly-data-through-july-2023-wheres-the-crisis/
 

Attachments

  • image-47.jpg
    image-47.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 49
Climate change is fraud invented to drive the new serfs, the ignorant coward Modern Morons, to their chains.

Where they belong, because stupid should hurt, this is a part of justice.

Buckle Up.
 
NOAA has updated its U.S. Contiguous USCRN Average Temperature Anomaly Data through July 2023 as shown below.

attachment.php

The measured data shows no supporting upward trends regarding U.S. 2023 average summer temperature anomalies to date. This reality flies in the face of the out-of-control media climate alarmist incompetent and idiotically hyped “tipping point” climate change temperature propaganda this summer as illustrated by these prior WUWT articles exposing this purely bogus garbage.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/08...aly-data-through-july-2023-wheres-the-crisis/

My sympathy tank for these ignorant coward fucks is dry.

They had every opportunity, they failed.

How is yours fairing?
 
NOAA has updated its U.S. Contiguous USCRN Average Temperature Anomaly Data through July 2023 as shown below.

attachment.php

The measured data shows no supporting upward trends regarding U.S. 2023 average summer temperature anomalies to date. This reality flies in the face of the out-of-control media climate alarmist incompetent and idiotically hyped “tipping point” climate change temperature propaganda this summer as illustrated by these prior WUWT articles exposing this purely bogus garbage.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/08...aly-data-through-july-2023-wheres-the-crisis/

Please note morons like Dumber69, Nutberg, Crypiss, Arsecheese and Strumpet that this is data directly from NOAA. If you don't like it then take it up with them!
 
Last edited:
More completely false/manipulated data from the lying-ass Climatistas/Warmists.

What a shocker...like ALL LEFTISTS, from BLM on, if the facts don't fit the preferred narrative...JUST LIE.




Fact check throws cold water on global ‘boiling’ claims


July was hot — no doubt about it. And media reporting on the heat wave was a raging wildfire of global warming hype.

But was it the worst-ever July scorcher, as the Washington Post, the Associated Press, USA Today, and others reported?

According to a group of fact-checkers who dug through the reports, the weather didn’t live up to the hype.

In fact, the July “Media Climate Fact Check” turned around a Washington Post claim about July being the hottest in 125,000 years, headlining the report, “Worst Media Coverage In 125,000 Years.”

In picking apart specific media stories about the heat, the report provided to Secrets acknowledged the unusual heat wave. But it also cited two anomalies that skewed the data: the impact of El Nino and a two-day spike in Antarctica’s temperature that helped raise the so-called “global temperature.”

What’s more, it noted that since U.S. satellite data on global temperatures have only been collected since 1979, it is impossible to compare temperatures from 100 years ago — or 125,000.

“That heat wave was only detected and factored into average global temperature because of satellite coverage of the globe. But satellite coverage didn’t begin until 1979. So similar heat waves that may have occurred before 1979 would be unknown and not factored into average global temperature calculations,” read the report.


July was hot — no doubt about it. And media reporting on the heat wave was a raging wildfire of global warming hype.

But was it the worst-ever July scorcher, as the Washington Post, the Associated Press, USA Today, and others reported?



According to a group of fact-checkers who dug through the reports, the weather didn’t live up to the hype.

In fact, the July “Media Climate Fact Check” turned around a Washington Post claim about July being the hottest in 125,000 years, headlining the report, “Worst Media Coverage In 125,000 Years.”

In picking apart specific media stories about the heat, the report provided to Secrets acknowledged the unusual heat wave. But it also cited two anomalies that skewed the data: the impact of El Nino and a two-day spike in Antarctica’s temperature that helped raise the so-called “global temperature.”

What’s more, it noted that since U.S. satellite data on global temperatures have only been collected since 1979, it is impossible to compare temperatures from 100 years ago — or 125,000.

“That heat wave was only detected and factored into average global temperature because of satellite coverage of the globe. But satellite coverage didn’t begin until 1979. So similar heat waves that may have occurred before 1979 would be unknown and not factored into average global temperature calculations,” read the report.


“So it is not possible to claim that July 2023 was the ‘hottest month in the history of civilization’ because such data does not exist,” read the analysis from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Heartland Institute, the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, the International Climate Science Coalition, and Truth in Energy and Climate.

Those organizations have long urged the media to tap the brakes on the climate change hype, but news outlets have stomped the accelerator instead in recent years.

What their report aims to do is counter the most outrageous reports with simple facts. The July report cited 10 media claims.

~ The AP reported that the ocean off Florida’s southern tip was like a “hot tub” and the “hottest seawater ever measured.” The fact-checkers, however, noted that the example wasn’t of the open ocean but a very shallow bay and not even a record high.

And USA Today reported that the extreme heat was a top killer. “Every year since 2000, an average of 20,000 people have died from extreme heat in European cities,” the outlet reported, citing a scientific paper. The fact check mocked that story, noting that cold kills far more than heat.




https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/t...p&cvid=c2ec237204a742608d51f4b8020f8160&ei=13




2jopi9.jpg

This article is a reprint from the Washington Examiner which is a questionable publication.
 
Last edited:
this morning on NBC a lib'rul said with a straight face that the cause of all the shark sightings is the presence of their food source......fish......and that it is a sign of a healthy eco system........
 
This article is a reprint from the Washington Examiner which is questionable publication.

You guys always whine about the source when you don't like the content.

The fact is that left wing sources will never tell you the truth about stuff like this.
 
You guys always whine about the source when you don't like the content.

The fact is that left wing sources will never tell you the truth about stuff like this.

only the mindfucked lib'rul would counter evidence of the Washington Post's outright lie with the claim that the Washington Examiner is a questionable publication for posting the facts.......
 
The reason MAGAs are sweating their fat asses like never before is presicely because global warming is real, and conservatives have demanded for the last 30 years that we keep saturating the atmosphere with human emissions of heat-trapping GHGs.
 
The reason MAGAs are sweating their fat asses like never before is presicely because global warming is real, and conservatives have demanded for the last 30 years that we keep saturating the atmosphere with human emissions of heat-trapping GHGs.

Your're an ignorant fuckwit, NOAA publishes temperature anomalies and they disagree with you!
U
 
The reason MAGAs are sweating their fat asses like never before is presicely because global warming is real, and conservatives have demanded for the last 30 years that we keep saturating the atmosphere with human emissions of heat-trapping GHGs.

You're an ignorant fuckwit, NOAA publishes temperature anomalies and they disagree with you.

NOAA has updated its U.S. Contiguous USCRN Average Temperature Anomaly Data through July 2023, see post 5.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...al-%91boiling%92-claims&p=5738674#post5738674
 
The reason MAGAs are sweating their fat asses like never before is presicely because global warming is real, and conservatives have demanded for the last 30 years that we keep saturating the atmosphere with human emissions of heat-trapping GHGs.

The fossil fuel companies have been funding the GOP for years.
 
You're an ignorant fuckwit, NOAA publishes temperature anomalies and they disagree with you.

NOAA has updated its U.S. Contiguous USCRN Average Temperature Anomaly Data through July 2023, see post 5.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...al-%91boiling%92-claims&p=5738674#post5738674

Good to hear you have such respect for NOAA

NOAA:

"We must urgently reduce our emissions while also increasing our efforts to adapt to the impacts we can no longer avoid. Simply put, societies and ecosystems need to prepare now for the increasing effects of extreme heat, drought, sea level rise, and other impacts of climate change."

https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/s...IPCC report is crystal,we can no longer avoid.
 
Good to hear you have such respect for NOAA

Is that your answer? Pathetic is mine!!

The U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) is a systematic and sustained network of climate monitoring stations with sites across the contiguous U.S., Alaska, and Hawaii. These stations use high-quality instruments to measure temperature, precipitation, soil conditions, and more. USCRN provides a continuous series of climate observations to monitor national climate trends and support climate-impact research.

The USCRN is made up of over 143 stations in the United States . Its purpose is to maintain a sustainable high quality network which will detect, with high confidence, signals of climate change in the US.[1] It provides the United States with a reference network that meets the requirements of the Global Climate Observing System.

The primary goal of the USCRN is to provide future long-term high-quality observations of surface air temperature and precipitation that can be coupled to past long-term observations for the detection and attribution of present and future climate change. It records data with minimal time dependent biases affecting the interpretation of decadal to centennial climate variability and change.

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based-station/us-climate-reference-network
 
Last edited:
NOAA has updated its U.S. Contiguous USCRN Average Temperature Anomaly Data through July 2023 as shown below.

attachment.php

The measured data shows no supporting upward trends regarding U.S. 2023 average summer temperature anomalies to date. This reality flies in the face of the out-of-control media climate alarmist incompetent and idiotically hyped “tipping point” climate change temperature propaganda this summer as illustrated by these prior WUWT articles exposing this purely bogus garbage.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/08...aly-data-through-july-2023-wheres-the-crisis/


Watts Up with That


Overall, we rate Watts Up with That a strong pseudoscience and conspiracy website based on promoting consistent human-influenced climate denialism propaganda and several failed fact checks


Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/watts-up-with-that/
 

Watts Up with That


Overall, we rate Watts Up with That a strong pseudoscience and conspiracy website based on promoting consistent human-influenced climate denialism propaganda and several failed fact checks


Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/watts-up-with-that/

You're so fucking predictable, you really are a total arsehole. They post NOAA data and you choose to hide behind a dodgy website like MB/FC. How the fuck would a bunch of journos be able to judge the science? The fact is they can't, so they resort instead to that which the accused others of, namely pseudoscience.
 
You're so fucking predictable, you really are a total arsehole. They post NOAA data and you choose to hide behind a dodgy website like MB/FC. How the fuck would a bunch of journos be able to judge the science? The fact is they can't, so they resort instead to that which the accused others of, namely pseudoscience.

You might consider going to your doctor and having him prescribe something to calm you down before you have a nervous breakdown.
 
Back
Top