Nation of cowards

Too bad they solely pit themselves against the defenseless and too often point their weapons at their own populace. Hundreds of years ago they were a force to be reckoned with, at the top of the technology as well as dedicated. Now they are weak and pitted solely against those who have no armies. Too bad. They were once great.

No that describes the USA. They seem to pick on the weak. Thats why they haven't tried to mess with North Korea. Even though they could just fire a nuke? That wouldn't sit well with the rest of the world so that option is off the table.

If they tried to invade NK like they did Iraq or Afghanistan,the USA would be wiped out.

And that comment about Taiwan? You think Taiwan would stand a chance against the Chinese military? Not without American backing. And even then, there would be nothing left for the USA to save.
 
We are not so foolish as to allow the facts of our weapons to be known. We are content that our capabilities are progressing.

How have your military victories happened lately? Have the brigands in Iraq and Afghanistan been cowed by your well-publicized armed might? Has Bin Laden given himself up to your mercy?

I laugh long.

Still, compared to the USA you are still far behind. And America's military spending is 100X that of the Chinese.

If the USA were to use their full might? Iraq and Afghan would be a crater right about now.....Though they would look like butchers and be shunned by the international community.
 
Your display of ignorance underscores your weakness.

The very concept of victory is Chinese. Have you not heard of Sun Tzu?

The Chinese fighters have been a force to be reckoned with for thousands of years.

They have fought many would-be invaders (the Mongols, Japanese) and survived. They have won major victories against nations that were supposedly more sophisticated, better armed and at times more numerous.

Yet we perservere. Your nation has a short history and already you decline. You have not triumphed since 1945 and that victory was gained on the backs of others.

China's strength is they are great thinkers. Not fighters. The Chinese are a very wise race. And led the world in technology until they were conquered and subdued with opium and corruption(funded by foreign elites).
 
Chinese culture is very interesting.

But even from ancient times, individual thinking and personal initiative are basically foreign. Collectivists have no brain basically, and need to be told what to do. But no central planner is clever enough to defeat a society based on individualism.

They think they have us now, but they have no idea. Yeah. DUmp the dollar, I dare you.

Yellow peril, more like yellow minor annoyance with not much peril in sight.
 
Chinese culture is very interesting.

But even from ancient times, individual thinking and personal initiative are basically foreign. Collectivists have no brain basically, and need to be told what to do. But no central planner is clever enough to defeat a society based on individualism.

They think they have us now, but they have no idea. Yeah. DUmp the dollar, I dare you.

Yellow peril, more like yellow minor annoyance with not much peril in sight.

It is clear you are uneducated about the Chinese culture in ancient times.

China has only been communist in nature less than 100 years.

A central planner is key to optimal results.

A society based on individualism is divided and thus more insufficient.
 
It is clear you are uneducated about the Chinese culture in ancient times.

China has only been communist in nature less than 100 years.

A central planner is key to optimal results.

A society based on individualism is divided and thus more insufficient.

But division creates competition and brings out the best. Monopolies foster laziness, inefficiency, and corruption.


Being ruled by totalitarian emperors is not an individualist society.

Your lips on china's cock is apparent.
 
But division creates competition and brings out the best.

This myth was destroyed a long time ago. Keeping information(Tech, medical break throughs) from each other as opposed to sharing it, deters progress.

For example.I wouldn't be surprised if there already is a cure for cancer but it would be unprofitable for privatized health care systems.

Since they make WAY more money treating it....

And the quest to reach outer space would have been achieved much quicker if information was shared as opposed to competition.

Alot of times, break throughs are made from spying on your competition(and see if they discovered something you didn't)......


Monopolies foster laziness, inefficiency, and corruption.

So do unions.

Though Socialism does not necessarily mean that the hard worker is not entitled to bonus pay.

And what do you think is happening in America with all these mergers? Monopolies.....So much for capitalism....


Being ruled by totalitarian emperors is not an individualist society.

Your lips on china's cock is apparent.

I never said I supported forced socialism which is communism. I am just stating that a central planner is better than individual thinking. Why do you think governments were formed?
 
Last edited:
This myth was destroyed a long time ago. Keeping information(Tech, medical break throughs) from each other as opposed to sharing it, deters progress.

For example.I wouldn't be surprised if there already is a cure for cancer but it would be unprofitable for privatized health care systems.

Since they make WAY more money treating it....

And the quest to reach outer space would have been achieved much quicker if information was shared as opposed to competition.

Alot of times, break throughs are made from spying on your competition(and see if they discovered something you didn't)......




So do unions.

Though Socialism does not necessarily mean that the hard worker is not entitled to bonus pay.

And what do you think is happening in America with all these mergers? Monopolies.....So much for capitalism....




I never said I supported forced socialism which is communism. I am just stating that a central planner is better than individual thinking. Why do you think governments were formed?

The very impetus to achieve relies on individual drive.

You assume that statesmen act in a detached fashion, for the benefit of all. They don't. They use the lies, like the superiority of central planning, to buttress their personal power. And central planner burnouts like you, envision loads of power to go along with what you imagine are your superior thoughts.

elitism and central planning = parasitism.
 
The very impetus to achieve relies on individual drive.

True but you know how the saying goes? 2 heads are better than one. When ever I am doing some work? It is usually helpful to have another(at least one) person's input.


You assume that statesmen act in a detached fashion, for the benefit of all. They don't. They use the lies, like the superiority of central planning, to buttress their personal power. And central planner burnouts like you, envision loads of power to go along with what you imagine are your superior thoughts.

I assume no such thing. Obviously their main interests are their own but they have to maintain some credibility so they do, do things for the better of all(atleast their voters).

To believe they dont do anything is ridiculous. They would be thrown out of office faster than you can blink.

And a central planner does exist on the federal level.

My thoughts are sound and supported by logic.



elitism and central planning = parasitism.

So you say society without governing(a central government) or courts to enforce them is better?:rolleyes: lol
 
True but you know how the saying goes? 2 heads are better than one. When ever I am doing some work? It is usually helpful to have another(at least one) person's input.




I assume no such thing. Obviously their main interests are their own but they have to maintain some credibility so they do, do things for the better of all(atleast their voters).

To believe they dont do anything is ridiculous. They would be thrown out of office faster than you can blink.

And a central planner does exist on the federal level.

My thoughts are sound and supported by logic.





So you say society without governing(a central government) or courts to enforce them is better?:rolleyes: lol

Our elections are gamed by monied interests. This level of corruption is only possible with a highly centralized government.

Two individuals working together is a nice cooperative thing. Central planner statists like yourself don't care what others want, so it ceases being cooperation and becomes a jackboot in the face.
 
Our elections are gamed by monied interests. This level of corruption is only possible with a highly centralized government.

A centralized organization yes. Not necessarily a government......

Though to believe that even a corrupt government does nothing for the benefit of its citizens is ridiculous.

Even satan himself mixes some truth with his lies to maintain credibility.

Two individuals working together is a nice cooperative thing. Central planner statists like yourself don't care what others want, so it ceases being cooperation and becomes a jackboot in the face.

On the contrary. I have put the interests of mankind, ahead of my own. That is why I am in debt, that is why I waste my time on the internet. Its not like I cannot occupy my time with other things(like work and women). My main concern is the children and their future and future generations. Not my own. Also suffering around the world of humankind.
 
Last edited:
A centralized organization yes. Not necessarily a government......

Though to believe that even a corrupt government does nothing for the benefit of its citizens is ridiculous.

Even satan himself mixes some truth with his lies to maintain credibility.



On the contrary. I have put the interests of mankind, ahead of my own. That is why I am in debt, that is why I waste my time on the internet. Its not like I cannot occupy my time with other things(like work and women). My main concern is the children and their future and future generations. Not my own.

Maybe it's just your heroic image of yourself at stake?
 
I agree. but your defense of central planner psychosis puts you on the wrong side. Im sorry. You must be eliminated.

lol. Central planning produces the most optimal results. Like I said. Try living in a society with no government or courts and see what kind of progress you have.
 
lol. Central planning produces the most optimal results. Like I said. Try living in a society with no government or courts and see what kind of progress you have.

Depends on your definitions of optimal and progress.

Many people, yourself apparently as well, believe adding more authoritarian layers is itself the embodiment of pogress, and it's optimal for them and the personal power it gives them.
 
Back
Top