Dems could have been indicted for Bush v. Gore by Georgia DA's standards: Dershowitz

ziggy

ziggy

Verified User
Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz has said that the charges in former President Donald Trump's latest indictment could have been used against Democrats who insisted that Al Gore won the 2000 presidential election.

"When I read the indictment, I said to myself, 'Oh, my God. I did some of those things during Bush vs Gore.' I did everything possible to try to get a recount. I called people and said, 'Look, it's only 600 votes. Can't we find 600 votes that were not properly counted?'"

Trump and 18 of his allies were indicted Monday night by a Georgia grand jury for engaging in a broad conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.

"This RICO indictment could have been applied to us Democrats who challenged the Bush v. Gore election in Florida," Dershowitz said. "It could have been used against Thomas Jefferson in 1800. It could have been used in the Tilden Hayes election. It could have been used against John F. Kennedy's people in Hawaii. Election challenges are a central part of America."

Some of the charges that Trump and others such as Mark Meadows and Rudy Giuliani are facing include allegedly making false statements to officials and false statements in relation to voting machines and "false electors."

Trump is also receiving backlash due to a 2021 phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger where he asked him to help him "find 11,780 votes."

Dershowitz said that that conversation was exculpatory, but not incriminating.

"You listen to that conversation from beginning to end and you read the transcript," he said. "It's clear what he was doing. He wasn't saying to manufacture or make votes. He was saying 'there are votes out there that haven't been counted. We have to find those votes.'"

"That's what I said in Florida in 2000," Dershowitz continued. "'We can find 600 votes-the butterfly ballots, the hanging chads. Come on, let's get to work. Let's find 600 votes and turn this election over to Al Gore.' I didn't do anything wrong, and certainly he didn't do anything wrong in this conversation. There may be more that we don't know about."

https://justthenews.com/government/...uld-have-been-indicted-under-trump-indictment
 
ziggy said:
Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz has said that the charges in former President Donald Trump's latest indictment could have been used against Democrats who insisted that Al Gore won the 2000 presidential election.

"When I read the indictment, I said to myself, 'Oh, my God. I did some of those things during Bush vs Gore.' I did everything possible to try to get a recount. I called people and said, 'Look, it's only 600 votes. Can't we find 600 votes that were not properly counted?'"

Trump and 18 of his allies were indicted Monday night by a Georgia grand jury for engaging in a broad conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.

"This RICO indictment could have been applied to us Democrats who challenged the Bush v. Gore election in Florida," Dershowitz said. "It could have been used against Thomas Jefferson in 1800. It could have been used in the Tilden Hayes election. It could have been used against John F. Kennedy's people in Hawaii. Election challenges are a central part of America."

Some of the charges that Trump and others such as Mark Meadows and Rudy Giuliani are facing include allegedly making false statements to officials and false statements in relation to voting machines and "false electors."

Trump is also receiving backlash due to a 2021 phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger where he asked him to help him "find 11,780 votes."

Dershowitz said that that conversation was exculpatory, but not incriminating.

"You listen to that conversation from beginning to end and you read the transcript," he said. "It's clear what he was doing. He wasn't saying to manufacture or make votes. He was saying 'there are votes out there that haven't been counted. We have to find those votes.'"

"That's what I said in Florida in 2000," Dershowitz continued. "'We can find 600 votes-the butterfly ballots, the hanging chads. Come on, let's get to work. Let's find 600 votes and turn this election over to Al Gore.' I didn't do anything wrong, and certainly he didn't do anything wrong in this conversation. There may be more that we don't know about."

https://justthenews.com/government/...uld-have-been-indicted-under-trump-indictment
Click to expand...

Yep. The Democratic Party has become insane thinking that it can just pile on specious indictments on top of specious indictments and not appear petty and partisan. NONE of these cases will end up with jail time. And shame on ANY judge taking them serious and not throwing them out based on fabricated legal theory.
 
Douchewitz is playing you Trumptards.

He gets paid good money to go on Fox News and say whatever Fox News wants him to say!

He don't mean a thing he says, he does it for the wads of money they pay him!

He voted for Biden in 2020 and intends to vote for Biden again in 2024! :laugh:
 
The radical Left doesn't give a shit. They see history as irrelevant. They want what they want and won't let historical precedent, logic, facts, or anything else stand in their way. For them, this is a show trail. It is two parts Stalin, one part Kafka. The outcome is predetermined and the trial a formality. That's how the radical Left rolls.
 
https://www.bmelaw.com/lawyers-John_Floyd.html


John authored the preeminent book on state Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statutes, RICO State By State: A Guide to Litigation Under the State Racketeering Statutes (American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law 2011 and 1998). He has also written numerous book chapters and articles on federal and state RICO.


This is a RICO expert


Douchewitz Is not

He sold his soul long ago
 
ziggy said:
Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz has said that the charges in former President Donald Trump's latest indictment could have been used against Democrats who insisted that Al Gore won the 2000 presidential election.

"When I read the indictment, I said to myself, 'Oh, my God. I did some of those things during Bush vs Gore.' I did everything possible to try to get a recount. I called people and said, 'Look, it's only 600 votes. Can't we find 600 votes that were not properly counted?'"

Trump and 18 of his allies were indicted Monday night by a Georgia grand jury for engaging in a broad conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.

"This RICO indictment could have been applied to us Democrats who challenged the Bush v. Gore election in Florida," Dershowitz said. "It could have been used against Thomas Jefferson in 1800. It could have been used in the Tilden Hayes election. It could have been used against John F. Kennedy's people in Hawaii. Election challenges are a central part of America."

Some of the charges that Trump and others such as Mark Meadows and Rudy Giuliani are facing include allegedly making false statements to officials and false statements in relation to voting machines and "false electors."

Trump is also receiving backlash due to a 2021 phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger where he asked him to help him "find 11,780 votes."

Dershowitz said that that conversation was exculpatory, but not incriminating.

"You listen to that conversation from beginning to end and you read the transcript," he said. "It's clear what he was doing. He wasn't saying to manufacture or make votes. He was saying 'there are votes out there that haven't been counted. We have to find those votes.'"

"That's what I said in Florida in 2000," Dershowitz continued. "'We can find 600 votes-the butterfly ballots, the hanging chads. Come on, let's get to work. Let's find 600 votes and turn this election over to Al Gore.' I didn't do anything wrong, and certainly he didn't do anything wrong in this conversation. There may be more that we don't know about."

https://justthenews.com/government/...uld-have-been-indicted-under-trump-indictment
Click to expand...

Utter horse shit.

Dershowitz will say anything to get his name in the news.
 
ziggy said:
Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz has said that the charges in former President Donald Trump's latest indictment could have been used against Democrats who insisted that Al Gore won the 2000 presidential election.

"When I read the indictment, I said to myself, 'Oh, my God. I did some of those things during Bush vs Gore.' I did everything possible to try to get a recount. I called people and said, 'Look, it's only 600 votes. Can't we find 600 votes that were not properly counted?'"

Trump and 18 of his allies were indicted Monday night by a Georgia grand jury for engaging in a broad conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.

"This RICO indictment could have been applied to us Democrats who challenged the Bush v. Gore election in Florida," Dershowitz said. "It could have been used against Thomas Jefferson in 1800. It could have been used in the Tilden Hayes election. It could have been used against John F. Kennedy's people in Hawaii. Election challenges are a central part of America."

Some of the charges that Trump and others such as Mark Meadows and Rudy Giuliani are facing include allegedly making false statements to officials and false statements in relation to voting machines and "false electors."

Trump is also receiving backlash due to a 2021 phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger where he asked him to help him "find 11,780 votes."

Dershowitz said that that conversation was exculpatory, but not incriminating.

"You listen to that conversation from beginning to end and you read the transcript," he said. "It's clear what he was doing. He wasn't saying to manufacture or make votes. He was saying 'there are votes out there that haven't been counted. We have to find those votes.'"

"That's what I said in Florida in 2000," Dershowitz continued. "'We can find 600 votes-the butterfly ballots, the hanging chads. Come on, let's get to work. Let's find 600 votes and turn this election over to Al Gore.' I didn't do anything wrong, and certainly he didn't do anything wrong in this conversation. There may be more that we don't know about."

https://justthenews.com/government/...uld-have-been-indicted-under-trump-indictment
Click to expand...

The Democrats have a double standard and show they want a police state to rig elections just like communists do
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
Douchewitz is playing you Trumptards.

He gets paid good money to go on Fox News and say whatever Fox News wants him to say!

He don't mean a thing he says, he does it for the wads of money they pay him!

He voted for Biden in 2020 and intends to vote for Biden again in 2024! :laugh:
Click to expand...

The Democrats are playing those who vote for them and showing the country how much control they have over their voters that they can do this and lockstep voters support the scam
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The radical Left doesn't give a shit. They see history as irrelevant. They want what they want and won't let historical precedent, logic, facts, or anything else stand in their way. For them, this is a show trail. It is two parts Stalin, one part Kafka. The outcome is predetermined and the trial a formality. That's how the radical Left rolls.
Click to expand...

That's it.....

:fap:

....just keep jacking off until Trump is back in the WH again.

Better get a 50 gallon drum of lube, though.

You're gonna be jacking off a loooooonnnnnggggg long time.
 
ptif219 said:
You support Democrats using the courts to win elections just like a communist country
Click to expand...

Fuck you, liar.

The Democrats are not prosecuting Trump.

Prosecutors and the courts are because he committed crimes against the United States.

Deal with it.
 
ziggy said:
Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz has said that the charges in former President Donald Trump's latest indictment could have been used against Democrats who insisted that Al Gore won the 2000 presidential election.

"When I read the indictment, I said to myself, 'Oh, my God. I did some of those things during Bush vs Gore.' I did everything possible to try to get a recount. I called people and said, 'Look, it's only 600 votes. Can't we find 600 votes that were not properly counted?'"

Trump and 18 of his allies were indicted Monday night by a Georgia grand jury for engaging in a broad conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.

"This RICO indictment could have been applied to us Democrats who challenged the Bush v. Gore election in Florida," Dershowitz said. "It could have been used against Thomas Jefferson in 1800. It could have been used in the Tilden Hayes election. It could have been used against John F. Kennedy's people in Hawaii. Election challenges are a central part of America."

Some of the charges that Trump and others such as Mark Meadows and Rudy Giuliani are facing include allegedly making false statements to officials and false statements in relation to voting machines and "false electors."

Trump is also receiving backlash due to a 2021 phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger where he asked him to help him "find 11,780 votes."

Dershowitz said that that conversation was exculpatory, but not incriminating.

"You listen to that conversation from beginning to end and you read the transcript," he said. "It's clear what he was doing. He wasn't saying to manufacture or make votes. He was saying 'there are votes out there that haven't been counted. We have to find those votes.'"

"That's what I said in Florida in 2000," Dershowitz continued. "'We can find 600 votes-the butterfly ballots, the hanging chads. Come on, let's get to work. Let's find 600 votes and turn this election over to Al Gore.' I didn't do anything wrong, and certainly he didn't do anything wrong in this conversation. There may be more that we don't know about."

https://justthenews.com/government/...uld-have-been-indicted-under-trump-indictment
Click to expand...
You live in a world of bullshit, you people are a waste of bandwidth. So ridiculous so stupid.
 
Nomad said:
That's it.....

:fap:

....just keep jacking off until Trump is back in the WH again.

Better get a 50 gallon drum of lube, though.

You're gonna be jacking off a loooooonnnnnggggg long time.
Click to expand...

You don't get it. I don't give a flying fuck if Trump gets reelected. I do give a shit that Biden doesn't see a second term and that some other Leftist doesn't take his place. For me the number 1 priority is keeping the Left out of power. I'd rather not see or have to vote for Trump to make that happen, but if he's all there is to stop that, then sobeit.
 
Nomad said:
Fuck you, liar.

The Democrats are not prosecuting Trump.

Prosecutors and the courts are because he committed crimes against the United States.

Deal with it.
Click to expand...

Only a democrat partisan fool believes that. We all know this is aboit the election not about any crimes
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Central_Voter_File



first, Florida specified only exact matches on names, birthdates and genders to identify voters as felons. However, state records reveal a memo dated March 1999 from Emmett "Bucky" Mitchell, a lawyer for the state elections office who was supervising the felon purge, asking DBT to loosen its criteria for acceptable matches. When DBT representatives warned Mitchell that this would yield a large proportion of false positives (mismatches), Mitchell's reply was that it would be up to each county elections supervisor to deal with the problem.[4]

In a February 2001 phone conversation with the BBC's London studios, ChoicePoint vice-president James Lee said that the state "wanted there to be more names than were actually verified as being a convicted felon".[5][6]

James Lee's testimony
Edit
On 17 April 2001, James Lee testified before the McKinney panel that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[4] His testimony indicates the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match and also include name reversals (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.

"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, the state's response to the company's suggestion was "Forget about it".

"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant ... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the fail-safe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[7]
 
https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2001/jan/29/uselections2000.usa


Al Gore, not George Bush, should be sitting in the White House today as the newly elected president of the United States, two new independent probes of the disputed Florida election contest have confirmed.
The first survey, conducted on behalf of the Washington Post, shows that Mr Gore had a nearly three-to-one majority among 56,000 Florida voters whose November 7 ballot papers were discounted because they contained more than one punched hole.
The second and separate survey, conducted on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, shows that Mr Gore had a majority of 682 votes among the discounted "dimpled" ballots in Palm Beach county.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top