Kyle Rittenhouse

anonymoose said:
I have absolutely no doubt he's gone through every thread w/ little mermaid looking for a post of mine. Probably still looking. He's obsessed w/ me.
Stalking is very much a consequence of Borderline Personality Disorder.
Click to expand...
I just put on a troll blocker and poof he was gone. :laugh:
 
ExpressLane said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
You're either a liar or ignorant of the law or both. I already posted the local law that states that an underage person (as widdle Kyle was at the time) could not possess such a weapon UNLESS PURCHASED AND SUPERVISED BY AN ADULT, TO BE USED FOR HUNTING ONLY. He was UNDERAGED to obtain a carry permit, and was not even a local citizen. And spare us all your wishful thinking and revisionist clap trap....eye witness and video has widdle Kyle declaring his guilt, AS HE STATED IN TRIAL...and guess what? THE COPS SAW HIM RUNNING AROUND WITH THAT ASSAULT RIFLE! In a situation of civil unrest/a riot, any cop worth his salt knows that you DETAIN, DISARM and arrest any civilian brandishing a weapon in a crowd.

See, you did was the usual right wing wonk shuffle. Face with facts you cannot deny that disproves your beliefs and agenda, you lie, deny and fabricate. As any high school debate teacher will tell you, that dog of yours won't fly.

Pew-pew-pew, indeed.
Click to expand...


He was supervised by his friend that was 21 and he did not have free access to the gun which was stored in a safe. in Kenosha Wi. The Prosecutor had to drop all gun charges on him. You are either a moron or a liar or most likely both. You obviously know very little about gun because assault rifles are automatic weapons. Kyle was using a semiautomatic weapon.
Click to expand...


Let me dismantled your FoxNews/NewsMax/RealAmericasVoice BS piece by piece:

1. He wasn't a resident to begin with.

2. He wasn't a family member nor living at that residence, so how the gun was stored is of no consequence or even in question.

3. He did not have a permit to open carry a weapon, much less be in possession of one.

3. Neither he or his friend were "hunting" or even target shooting in a riot situation at night, so by giving him the weapon and then going into the situation was a violation of the law.

4. Not quite. The judge did a questionable ruling which requires ignoring one rule for another EXPLAINER: Why did judge drop Rittenhouse gun charge?

https://apnews.com/article/why-did-...e-gun-charge-d923d8e255d6b1f5c9c9fc5b74e691fb

5. Spare me the time honored gun monkey BS regarding assault rifles. AR-15 STYLE weapons do exactly what they were originally designed for....to give schmucks like you a high impact semi-auto rifle that's relatively light weight with more controllable recoil TO KILL ONE OR MULTIPLE TARGETS QUICKLY AND EFFECTIVELY.


Essentially, widdle Kyle got away with manslaughter. Now he's going to face a trial similar to what OJ Simpson faced....one that has a lesser degree of proof for conviction. Ironic, isn't it? ;)
 
Doc Dutch said:
Neither did most of the Trumpers whining about it.
Click to expand...
What's that got to do with me?
Doc Dutch said:
Just because most didn't drink Bud Light didn't stop them from whining about it.
Click to expand...
What's that got to do with me?
Doc Dutch said:
Do you drink Bud Light, anymouse?
Click to expand...
I have. I couldn't care less if trannies drink it. Problem is, we've had a much chillier than normal summer this yr. I wouldn't even call it a summer. Not really beer drinking weather.
 
anonymoose said:
I have absolutely no doubt he's gone through every thread w/ little mermaid looking for a post of mine. Probably still looking. He's obsessed w/ me.
Stalking is very much a consequence of Borderline Personality Disorder.
Click to expand...

No doubt you're as adept as a psychiatrist as you are a dentist. :)
 
ExpressLane said:
Nope the law says :



So what does section 941.28 say?





The gun that Rittenhouse was carring was Smith and Wesson M&P 15 which has a barrel longer than 16 inches. That is why the gun charges were dropped by the judge.

BOOM BOOM BOOM
Click to expand...

So when all is said and done, widdle Kyle gets off because the weapon he was NOT legally allowed to possess, NOT because his friend WAS NOT legally allowed to give to him because neither of them were target shooting or hunting, but because the weapon he used to commit manslaughter had a short barrel. Yeah, I already knew that .... it's schizoid technicality. Or in other words, bad judgement that kept crucial evidence from the jury, as explained here https://apnews.com/article/why-did-...e-gun-charge-d923d8e255d6b1f5c9c9fc5b74e691fb

Yeah, that makes sense. :rolleyes: Somehow, I don't see that flying in a civil case involving wrongful death.

Carry on, Chicken Little. Pew-pew-pew indeed.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Let me dismantled your FoxNews/NewsMax/RealAmericasVoice BS piece by piece:

1. He wasn't a resident to begin with.

2. He wasn't a family member nor living at that residence, so how the gun was stored is of no consequence or even in question.
Click to expand...

1&2 His legal adult male friend bought the rifle and he kept itvstored in a gun safe at his friend's home in Wisconsi where is was bought by his friend.

3. He did not have a permit to open carry a weapon, much less be in possession of one.

3. Neither he or his friend were "hunting" or even target shooting in a riot situation at night, so by giving him the weapon and then going into the situation was a violation of the law.
Click to expand...

3. It does not require a permit nor does it require "hunting" It just requires compliance with law 941.28

941.28 “Short-barreled rifle" means a rifle having one or more barrels having a length of less than 16 inches measured from closed breech or bolt face to muzzle or a rifle having an overall length of less than 26 inches.

It is not against the law for an adult to lend a rifle with a 16 inch or longer barrel to a minor in Wisconsin. The Judge threw out the gun charges because Rittenhouse was in compliance with Statute 941.28


4. Not quite. The judge did a questionable ruling which requires ignoring one rule for another EXPLAINER: Why did judge drop Rittenhouse gun charge?

https://apnews.com/article/why-did-...e-gun-charge-d923d8e255d6b1f5c9c9fc5b74e691fb

5. Spare me the time honored gun monkey BS regarding assault rifles. AR-15 STYLE weapons do exactly what they were originally designed for....to give schmucks like you a high impact semi-auto rifle that's relatively light weight with more controllable recoil TO KILL ONE OR MULTIPLE TARGETS QUICKLY AND EFFECTIVELY.


Essentially, widdle Kyle got away with manslaughter. Now he's going to face a trial similar to what OJ Simpson faced....one that has a lesser degree of proof for conviction. Ironic, isn't it? ;)
Click to expand...

From YOUR source.

Hours before closing arguments began on Monday, Judge Bruce Schroeder granted a defense motion to toss out the weapons charge. Rittenhouse attorneys Mark Richards and Corey Chirafisi pointed to an exception in the law that they said allows minors to possess shotguns and rifles as long as they’re not short-barreled.

Assistant District Attorney James Kraus argued that the exception renders the state’s prohibition on minors possessing dangerous weapons meaningless. But when he acknowledged that Rittenhouse’s rifle’s barrel was longer than 16 inches, the minimum barrel length allowed under state law, Schroeder dismissed the charge.

To Kenosha-based defense attorney Michael Cicchini, the statute clearly requires a weapon to be short-barreled to apply, and the judge made the right call.
Click to expand...

Now get lost pendejo
 
Last edited:
Gondwanaland said:
No, just a patriot who hates commie scum like you who fought to imprison a young man who defended himself from pedophilic attackers who tried to kill him whilst rioting.
Click to expand...

1. No one asked widdle Kyle to go to Kenosha. He was a right wing jackass like you, enabled by his mom (another piece of work) who traveled cross state to live out his Turner Diaries fantasy. No one knows what transpired prior to the shooting precisely (no video as to who started what), but what is known is that he committed manslaughter and got off because the judge denied the jury certain evidence due to an archaic rule about gun barrel length. Now he's facing a civil suit, where EVERYTHING is on the table, and the BS the other judge rule won't fly. Should be interesting.

2. NO ONE knew of the prior conviction of one of the persons widdle Kyle shot.

3. Cops let widdle Kyle go after he gets in their eye sight and confesses to shooting someone. Why? The civil trial may include the local cops in a suit as well for negligence.

4. Vigilante actions don't automatically equate "patriotism".

5. If this was a communist country and I was a communist, Kyle would be in jail and so would you as I would report you to the KGB (or Gestapo). Clearly that is not the case, so stop babbling like a MAGA mook and discuss the issue rationally and logically, based on facts.
 
Doc Dutch said:
No doubt you're as adept as a psychiatrist as you are a dentist. :)
Click to expand...

Thank you. I've never been sued or disciplined by a state board and had a great practice before selling it. Any problem pts. I had I'd dismiss in a heartbeat. I doubt you'd make it past the front desk on your first appointment.
Observing and recognizing personality disorders is just a hobby of mine after I took an 8 hr. CE course on it.
You're a fascinating subject without a doubt.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
1. No one asked widdle Kyle to go to Kenosha. He was a right wing jackass like you, enabled by his mom (another piece of work) who traveled cross state to live out his Turner Diaries fantasy. No one knows what transpired prior to the shooting precisely (no video as to who started what), but what is known is that he committed manslaughter and got off because the judge denied the jury certain evidence due to an archaic rule about gun barrel length. Now he's facing a civil suit, where EVERYTHING is on the table, and the BS the other judge rule won't fly. Should be interesting.

2. NO ONE knew of the prior conviction of one of the persons widdle Kyle shot.

3. Cops let widdle Kyle go after he gets in their eye sight and confesses to shooting someone. Why? The civil trial may include the local cops in a suit as well for negligence.

4. Vigilante actions don't automatically equate "patriotism".

5. If this was a communist country and I was a communist, Kyle would be in jail and so would you as I would report you to the KGB (or Gestapo). Clearly that is not the case, so stop babbling like a MAGA mook and discuss the issue rationally and logically, based on facts.
Click to expand...
:sadbaby:
 
ExpressLane said:
1&@ His legal adult male friend bought the rifle and he kept itvstored in a gun safe at his friend's home in Wisconsi where is was bought by his friend.



3. It does not require a permit nor does it require "hunting" I just require compliance with law 941.28

941.28 “Short-barreled rifle" means a rifle having one or more barrels having a length of less than 16 inches measured from closed breech or bolt face to muzzle or a rifle having an overall length of less than 26 inches.

It is not against the law for an adult to lend a rifle with a 16 inch or longer barrel to a minor in Wisconsin. The Judge threw out the gun charges because Rittenhouse was in compliance with Statute 941.28


4. Not quite. The judge did a questionable ruling which requires ignoring one rule for another EXPLAINER: Why did judge drop Rittenhouse gun charge?

https://apnews.com/article/why-did-...e-gun-charge-d923d8e255d6b1f5c9c9fc5b74e691fb

5. Spare me the time honored gun monkey BS regarding assault rifles. AR-15 STYLE weapons do exactly what they were originally designed for....to give schmucks like you a high impact semi-auto rifle that's relatively light weight with more controllable recoil TO KILL ONE OR MULTIPLE TARGETS QUICKLY AND EFFECTIVELY.


Essentially, widdle Kyle got away with manslaughter. Now he's going to face a trial similar to what OJ Simpson faced....one that has a lesser degree of proof for conviction. Ironic, isn't it? ;)
Click to expand...
[/QUOTE]

1. No shit Sherlock!?! That has been established and STILL puts widdle Kyle and his dopey friend in violation of the laws (no target practice, hunting intended, no legal right to carry in public streets).

2. Either you can't read or you're just a bad liar. The law plainly states that under aged persons cannot possess or carry a weapon unless under the supervision of an adult for the express purpose of target practice or hunting. Having widdle Kyle sitting in a house with the gun as a gift doesn't justify the subsequent actions (no hunting or target practice, roaming the streets at night with a loaded weapon).

3. Yeah, I told YOU about the barrel length BS. Because of that archaic law, the judge kept vital information from the jury. Here's how that "logic" works: an out-of-towner arrives in a city that is having civil unrest/riots. He is driven there by his mother, as he is not of age to have a full driver's license. He goes to friends house, where they both dress up in para-military type clothes and carry some first aid kits. The friend gives the out-of-towner an AR-15 style weapon, of which by law he (under age) is NOT allowed to have or carry in public. He can only use in hunting or target practice SUPERVISED BY THE ADULT THAT GAVE HIM THE WEAPON. They go to the area of civil unrest/riot, enter pass the police line. The out-of-towner goes to areas where there are small businesses (UNINVITED) BRANDISHING THEIR WEAPONS, and becomes embroiled in a confrontation with some of the rioters. Scuffles and a chase ensues, with the out-of-towner shooting his chasers, killing two, wounding one. He goes to present cops and states he just shot some people, but is not detained, disarmed or arrested. He leaves the area, later to turn himself in.


We can rehash this until the cows come home, but YOU CANNOT ELIMINATE ALL THE FACTS TO WHICH THE JUDGES RULING WAS DUBIOUS AT BEST.

The civil trial is going to be REAL interesting.
 
ExpressLane;5786380 [QUOTE said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
1. No one asked widdle Kyle to go to Kenosha. He was a right wing jackass like you, enabled by his mom (another piece of work) who traveled cross state to live out his Turner Diaries fantasy. No one knows what transpired prior to the shooting precisely (no video as to who started what), but what is known is that he committed manslaughter and got off because the judge denied the jury certain evidence due to an archaic rule about gun barrel length. Now he's facing a civil suit, where EVERYTHING is on the table, and the BS the other judge rule won't fly. Should be interesting.

2. NO ONE knew of the prior conviction of one of the persons widdle Kyle shot.

3. Cops let widdle Kyle go after he gets in their eye sight and confesses to shooting someone. Why? The civil trial may include the local cops in a suit as well for negligence.

4. Vigilante actions don't automatically equate "patriotism".

5. If this was a communist country and I was a communist, Kyle would be in jail and so would you as I would report you to the KGB (or Gestapo). Clearly that is not the case, so stop babbling like a MAGA mook and discuss the issue rationally and logically, based on facts.
Click to expand...



]:sadbaby:[/QUOTE]

One idiot MAGA minion rushing to the defense of another. Childish memes are the best they can do. Sad.

Pew-pew-pew, Chicken Little.
 
anonymoose said:
Thank you. I've never been sued or disciplined by a state board and had a great practice before selling it. Any problem pts. I had I'd dismiss in a heartbeat. I doubt you'd make it past the front desk on your first appointment.
Observing and recognizing personality disorders is just a hobby of mine after I took an 8 hr. CE course on it.
You're a fascinating subject without a doubt.
Click to expand...
I got sued once. It was a sued every doctor on the chart thing.. They even sue the radiologist that read the CT correctly. I eventually was dismissed from the suit and did not have a a judgement against me but it hung over my head for 5 years. I saw this woman in the ER of a small hospital. I correctly diagnosed her then arranged for transfer to a much larger Fort Worth hospital that could care for her. The only helicopter ambulance was 45 minutes away in Dallas. She was transferred and left my hospital 75 minutes after she checked in. She arrived with the same vitals as she had when she was transferred. She died of sepsis 3 hours after she arrived in Fort Worth. I hate ambulance chasing lawyers. This was legal extortion. None of the docs did anything wrong . Her husband just kept her at home poking Vicodin down her until she was too sick for anyone to save.
 
ExpressLane said:
I got sued once. It was a sued every doctor on the chart thing.. They even sue the radiologist that read the CT correctly. I eventually was dismissed from the suit and did not have a a judgement against me but it hung over my head for 5 years. I saw this woman in the ER of a small hospital. I correctly diagnosed her then arranged for transfer to a much larger Fort Worth hospital that could care for her. The only helicopter ambulance was 45 minutes away in Dallas. She was transferred and left my hospital 75 minutes after she checked in. She arrived with the same vitals as she had when she was transferred. She died of sepsis 3 hours after she arrived in Fort Worth. I hate ambulance chasing lawyers. This was legal extortion. None of the docs did anything wrong . Her husband just kept her at home poking Vicodin down her until she was too sick for anyone to save.
Click to expand...

I have a friend that's an ER doc in Douglas, GA, same thing. Sue every doc on the chart and hope something lands. He LOVES getting sued. Not only does he win every time but he gets a real kick out of making the ambulance chasers look stupid.
I was an expert witness once when I was the dental director at a community health center when an employee/dentist was sued.
Long story short I made the ambulance chaser look like a total fool at the deposition complete with text book documentation and scientific publications that totally quashed his arguments.
 
Last edited:
anonymoose said:
I have a friend that's an ER doc in Douglas, GA, same thing. Sue every doc on the chart and hope something lands. He LOVES getting sued. Not only does he win every time but he gets a real kick out of making the ambulance chasers look stupid.
I was an expert witness once when I was the dental director at a community health center when an employee/dentist was sued.
Long story short I made the ambulance chaser look like a total fool at the deposition complete with text book documentation and scientific publications that completely quashed his arguments.
Click to expand...

...Jarod wets panties.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top