Reality check for neocons

Damocles said:
Hmm.. I didn't know he put people on ignore. I see a pattern where he doesn't actually provide any information but says he does while tossing ad homs.



Basically the conversation goes like this.

<Conservative Poster>: Says something about his opinion, links to an article.

<TaichiLiberal>: Throws out an ad hom and adds a link that doesn't say what he says it does.

<CP>: Points out his link doesn't say what he says it does, even provides quotes.

<TCL>: Throws out a few more ad homs and then says he's proven something he has been shown not to have proved.

<CP>: Once again, providing quotes and the same link again, points out that his link doesn't say what he says it said and asks for him to quote anything that actually supports his position.

<TCL>: Links back to a post where he ad hommed a person and provided no links or evidence of his position, then throws out some more ad homs....

And so forth...
Click to expand...

You're a liar Damo....when someone doesn't debate as YOU determine, but can effectively challenge your opinion, you get all pissy. You're STILL carrying a grudge because I wouldn't let you bullshit your way around the facts, and pointed out you have to have to have FULL comprehension of ALL the facts before drawing a conclusion, and not just isolating one particular fact. We did the dance, you lost and you don't like it. TFB. If you want to devolve to the level of some of the more insipidly stubborn neocon parrots on these boards, so be it.


NOTE THAT INSTEAD OF HAVING SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE TO SAY ABOUT THE OPENING POSTS ON THIS THREAD, YOU CHIME IN ON THE PERSONAL BITCH FEST BY SOME OF THE MORE CELEBRATED NEOCON CLOWNS ON THESE BOARDS....I'd expected better of you at this point.
 
Taichiliberal said:
You're a liar Damo....when someone doesn't debate as YOU determine, but can effectively challenge your opinion, you get all pissy. You're STILL carrying a grudge because I wouldn't let you bullshit your way around the facts, and pointed out you have to have to have FULL comprehension of ALL the facts before drawing a conclusion, and not just isolating one particular fact. We did the dance, you lost and you don't like it. TFB. If you want to devolve to the level of some of the more insipidly stubborn neocon parrots on these boards, so be it.


NOTE THAT INSTEAD OF HAVING SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE TO SAY ABOUT THE OPENING POSTS ON THIS THREAD, YOU CHIME IN ON THE PERSONAL BITCH FEST BY SOME OF THE MORE CELEBRATED NEOCON CLOWNS ON THESE BOARDS....I'd expected better of you at this point.
Click to expand...
LOL. See?

Anyway, that's the pattern that I see. I point it out often, it isn't like this is the first time you have heard it, just the first time you've seen it in the form of a play.

I wonder if Thread Director may use it some day... I know that I may just link back to that post when I see the pattern developing. It will entertain me.

:D

P.S. Sometimes you take this board and yourself too seriously.
 
Taichiliberal said:
You're a liar Damo....when someone doesn't debate as YOU determine, but can effectively challenge your opinion, you get all pissy. You're STILL carrying a grudge because I wouldn't let you bullshit your way around the facts, and pointed out you have to have to have FULL comprehension of ALL the facts before drawing a conclusion, and not just isolating one particular fact. We did the dance, you lost and you don't like it. TFB. If you want to devolve to the level of some of the more insipidly stubborn neocon parrots on these boards, so be it.


NOTE THAT INSTEAD OF HAVING SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE TO SAY ABOUT THE OPENING POSTS ON THIS THREAD, YOU CHIME IN ON THE PERSONAL BITCH FEST BY SOME OF THE MORE CELEBRATED NEOCON CLOWNS ON THESE BOARDS....I'd expected better of you at this point.
Click to expand...


No, tool. Damo's assessment of your general style is spot on. you suck at thinking.
 
Taichiliberal said:
You're a liar Damo........

NOTE THAT INSTEAD OF HAVING SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE TO SAY ABOUT THE OPENING POSTS ON THIS THREAD, YOU CHIME IN ON THE PERSONAL BITCH FEST BY SOME OF THE MORE CELEBRATED NEOCON CLOWNS ON THESE BOARDS....I'd expected better of you at this point.
Click to expand...

Translation:

WWHHAAAAA! THEY'RE PICKING ON ME!

:rofl:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
You're a liar Damo....when someone doesn't debate as YOU determine, but can effectively challenge your opinion, you get all pissy. You're STILL carrying a grudge because I wouldn't let you bullshit your way around the facts, and pointed out you have to have to have FULL comprehension of ALL the facts before drawing a conclusion, and not just isolating one particular fact. We did the dance, you lost and you don't like it. TFB. If you want to devolve to the level of some of the more insipidly stubborn neocon parrots on these boards, so be it.


NOTE THAT INSTEAD OF HAVING SOMETHING CONSTRUCTIVE TO SAY ABOUT THE OPENING POSTS ON THIS THREAD, YOU CHIME IN ON THE PERSONAL BITCH FEST BY SOME OF THE MORE CELEBRATED NEOCON CLOWNS ON THESE BOARDS....I'd expected better of you at this point.
Click to expand...

Damocles said:
LOL. See?

Anyway, that's the pattern that I see. I point it out often, it isn't like this is the first time you have heard it, just the first time you've seen it in the form of a play.

I wonder if Thread Director may use it some day... I know that I may just link back to that post when I see the pattern developing. It will entertain me.

:D

P.S. Sometimes you take this board and yourself too seriously.
Click to expand...

See what, my chuckling friend? This is a WRITTEN forum, so unless you elaborate in print wha'ts on your mind, the reader doesn't have a clue with these cryptic one one liners. ELUCIDATE, MY CHILD, ELUCIDATE!

Hey, you can repeat your "pattern" BS until doomsday....like I use to tell the neocon peanut gallery on the old AOL board, repetition does not a truism make. But if it helps you sleep at night instead of an honest debate, go for it.

Bottom line: we've done this dance....it was nonsense then, it's nonsense now. Pity it's the only thing you have to offer other than, oh say, an honest debate on the subject of this thread. And the "you take things too seriously" is the typical cop out used by those who were proven wrong on a point and don't like, or were caught being vindictive little cusses because of it. Sad.
 
AssHatZombie said:
No, tool. Damo's assessment of your general style is spot on. you suck at thinking.
Click to expand...

Says the man with his ass in his hat who feels the need to tell me that he has no tool to work with.

Go figure. Like Damo, our intellectually challenged friend here has YET to honestly debate the points in the opening post of this thread.
 
meme said:
really,what the hell happened to this President's "white half"??
funny how you never see his WHITE family?
they keep them hidden and only use his black family so they can level the charge of RACISIM to anyone who critizied him..
Click to expand...

Duh. The white half is DEAD, mimi, or do you know something the rest of us don't?
 
meme said:
I'm not talking about Pictures, I'm talking live bodies..
what? ALL his white family died when his grandmother did?
Click to expand...

Here's the family tree: [ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_of_Barack_Obama[/ame]

Again, which "white" ones are you referring to?
 
The Dudes father Dude was most certainly not a type A.
But he stayed out of trouble, and drove that 73 Ford Torino rust bucket forever to be able to send the Dude to College.
 
Damocles said:
Hmm.. I didn't know he put people on ignore. I see a pattern where he doesn't actually provide any information but says he does while tossing ad homs.

Basically the conversation goes like this.

<Conservative Poster>: Says something about his opinion, links to an article.

<TaichiLiberal>: Throws out an ad hom and adds a link that doesn't say what he says it does.

<CP>: Points out his link doesn't say what he says it does, even provides quotes.

<TCL>: Throws out a few more ad homs and then says he's proven something he has been shown not to have proved.

<CP>: Once again, providing quotes and the same link again, points out that his link doesn't say what he says it said and asks for him to quote anything that actually supports his position.

<TCL>: Links back to a post where he ad hommed a person and provided no links or evidence of his position, then throws out some more ad homs....

And so forth...
Click to expand...

Thats just about a perfect description of EVERY thread he participates in....

I'm glad he has me on his ignore list, I was getting tired of cleaning his clock every time out.....
TC motto....If you can't beat 'em...ignore 'em....:igive:
.
.
.
.

:mun::lolup:
 
christiefan915 said:
Duh. The white half is DEAD, mimi, or do you know something the rest of us don't?
Click to expand...

oh really, so there are no aunts, uncles, cousins from the WHITE side?
and how funny, he has a Aunt living here illegally, I think we heard in Boston, yet you hear nothing from her..
 
Last edited:
Southern Man said:
Black men seem to have no problem doing that. Fist it was his father, then Barack did it to the white grandmother who raised him while his mother was slutting around.
Click to expand...

Racial stereotypes and slander seem to be your forte when it comes to Obama. And don't waste everyone's time with the usual one sided stats receital about all things negative about black folk in America...because if your moma didn't tell ya, I will....what you site is neither exclusive or overwhelmingly held by black men alone in America.

Bottom line: you just can't deal with the FACTS that the neocon rhetoric regarding Obama and anti-terrorist programs is just a lot of sour grapes ridden propaganda.
 
Originally Posted by meme
OH? what is your chickenhawk President doing right now, first with Pakistan, and now Yemen??

you call them PEACE missions..
Click to expand...

christiefan915 said:
And your point is what, that we should invade them pre-emptively?
Click to expand...

Yeah, maybe meme will volunteer for the next invasion/occupation. Only this time meme will have to wait for Hannity/Limbaugh et., al. to explain to him why Obama would be wrong in doing so.
 
meme said:
oh really, so there are no aunts, uncles, cousins from the WHITE side?
and how funny, he has a Aunt living here illegally, I think we heard in Boston, yet you hear nothing from her..
Click to expand...

And of course, because she doesn't do a public newsletter, your supposition and conjecture should be taken as gospel?

I don't recall a public review of ALL relatives of the President being required by the media or the Congress since I've been alive, and each one varies as to public exposure of the extended family.

But hey, if slander is your thing, go for it.
 
Taichiliberal said:
If you're referring to presidential nomination, I believe it was offered to Colin Powell, who declined. But does this have anything to do with the opening subject post? If you're responding to those idiots meme and Southie, then you're wasting you're time, as I'm sure they are babbling on about anything BUT the points in the opening post...which is why I have them on IA.
Click to expand...

Please show us where the nomination was ever offered to Powell. The nomination, Jeebus.
 
meme said:
oh really, so there are no aunts, uncles, cousins from the WHITE side?
and how funny, he has a Aunt living here illegally, I think we heard in Boston, yet you hear nothing from her..
Click to expand...

The Boston aunt is from his father's side. His mother was an only child. I already linked to a family tree showing that everyone on his mother's side is dead. His grandmother died just a year ago.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top