DId the Maine shooter have the right to bear an AR-15?

John Stewart called out a right wing Politician on this Magatard derp shit you guys are saying.

Right wingers have no issues saying the Free Speech (drag, trans issues, etc) need to be restricted because 'saving the children is so important', while the same derp right winger says 'gun rights and the 2nd amendment cannot be touched' even though kids are being slaughtered in mass numbers. So protecting kids from something they might hear = 'ok to limit constitutional rights'.... but saving those same kids lives =/= ok to limit constitutional rights.

 
Jarod said:
The Constitution requires the Fed to provide for the general welfare and protect the blessings of liberty. How are those Sandy Hook kids enjoying the blessings of liberty? How is their general welfare?
Click to expand...

It also requires that the govt not infringe on the right to own a gun but you're from the party of infringement. Didn't you say no right is absolute? Honest God Jarod you need to stop posting.
 
It appears the alt-lefties here forget about all the young adults killed in automobile accidents due to texting and driving and the 10's of thousands that die each year of drug overdoses.
 
Jarod said:
The Constitution requires the Fed to provide for the general welfare and protect the blessings of liberty. How are those Sandy Hook kids enjoying the blessings of liberty? How is their general welfare?
Click to expand...
How is allowing massive illegal immigration providing for the general welfare of Americans? How is not stopping the majority of fentanyl providing for the general welfare? We need another President.
 
Yakuda said:
It also requires that the govt not infringe on the right to own a gun but you're from the party of infringement. Didn't you say no right is absolute? Honest God Jarod you need to stop posting.
Click to expand...

What rights do you believe are absolute?
 
QP! said:
Why not if they have not committed any crime YET!

I see you and others absoluters here seem to not care about other Constitutional rights other than gun ownership.

What about that mentally ill persons right to not have any punishment or restriction put upon them until AFTER they commit some crime? You know, that whole 'innocent UNTIL PROVEN guilty' thing that is usually required before enacting punishment or restrictions.
Click to expand...

We can involuntarily commit mentally ill people who are dangerous to others or themselves. . They have not committed a crime either. I committed a patient who was threatening his other in a schizophrenic episode when I worked in an ER.
 
QP! said:
John Stewart called out a right wing Politician on this Magatard derp shit you guys are saying.

Right wingers have no issues saying the Free Speech (drag, trans issues, etc) need to be restricted because 'saving the children is so important', while the same derp right winger says 'gun rights and the 2nd amendment cannot be touched' even though kids are being slaughtered in mass numbers. So protecting kids from something they might hear = 'ok to limit constitutional rights'.... but saving those same kids lives =/= ok to limit constitutional rights.

Click to expand...

I thought you Derps hated John Stewart :dunno:
 
Jarod said:
I do not think there was an epidemic of people firing those morters into a large crowd of people at innocent gatherings or schools full of children.
Click to expand...

We have an epidemic of hyperbole and demagoguery by activists fighting to end civil rights.

Acts of firing AR-15's into "large crowd of people at innocent gatherings or schools full of children" are extremely rare.

If you are going to be killed by a gun, it's almost certain to be 9mm. After that a .22, then .38. then .45. You know what they all have in common? They're handguns.

But facts don't matter to you, you want civil rights ended, and ended now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top