A Conservative Case for Gay Marriage - Promoting American Values

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
Southern Man said:
You queers can poke each other all you want as far as I care.
Click to expand...

Dodging the question again?

You commented about what you think the gals should do, so I simply asked what you think the guys should do. And you post another bit about queers poking each other. Talk about a serious fixation.


You want women to abstain from sex until marriage. What about the men?
 
Southern Man said:
The answer is obvious. Only a faggot or moron would think otherwise.
Click to expand...

The answer is most certainly not obvious. In the same way that you use history as a basis for your argument for preventing gay marriage, I can use history as evidence that men have been encouraged to have sex before marriage and women have been denied the same.

You have bragged about how much sex you had in college, thinking it makes you sound like a stud. But if a woman did the same thing, she is labelled a slut or whore.



And I see you are still avoiding the question.
 
WinterBorn said:
If you are going to claim to win debates, you ought to stop lying or making up facts.

"1. Present in or produced by nature: a natural pearl."

That most certainly proves that homosexuality is natural. It is present in nature. Go back and read the link I posted.
Click to expand...
Since WHEN were humans removed from the natural world? IT does occur in nature, about 10% of the human population is homosexual.
 
Southern Man said:
...I know how you think.
Click to expand...

And you have made the same claim against quite a few other posters.


So its either you have some magical ability to know how numerous other people actually think, or you are a faggot and are afraid to come out of the closet.



Which is more likely? Hmmmmm
 
Southern Man said:
The 10% figure never had any scientific basis and current science pegs it at about 1%. Even queers admit this.
Click to expand...

10% or 1%, it really doesn't matter. Your claim that homosexuality is unnatural has been proven false.
 
The 1% figure proves the "abnormal" argument. The "unnatural" argument has not been disproved, except in your mind.
 
Southern Man said:
Your logic identifies you as a complete moron or a faggot, your choice.
Click to expand...

My logic is fine. Unless you would care to explain why you claim otherwise? Of course, this would mean you have to explain how you "know" what other people think. lol
 
Southern Man said:
The 1% figure proves the "abnormal" argument. The "unnatural" argument has not been disproved, except in your mind.
Click to expand...

You still haven't read the rest of the National Geographic article? It has been observed in nature in numerous species. And none of the observations listed were about dominance.

I guess denying facts does make your argument easier to maintain. But it doesn't change the facts.
 
Abnormal behavior has been observed in nature. That doesn't make it natural; it makes it abnormal. Or you can cite peer-reviewed studies to the contrary.
 
Southern Man said:
Abnormal behavior has been observed in nature. That doesn't make it natural; it makes it abnormal. Or you can cite peer-reviewed studies to the contrary.
Click to expand...

Considering the evidence offered by Nat Geo, its not a rare occurance.

The evidence of observed behavior in numerous species by reputable scientific organizations is enough to negate your argument that it is unnatural.
 
Southern Man said:
If so, then you could cite peer-reviewed studies.
Click to expand...

If I did, it would simply be labelled part of the homosexual agenda.

The links offering peer reviewed research concerning whether homosexuality was a choice or not was ignored by you.

The links offering peer reviewed evidence that children of gay parents are healthy, happy, and normal was ignored by you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top